10-25-2020, 12:02 PM
|
#3611 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,727
Thanks: 36
Thanked 2,466 Times in 1,721 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd
I just saw this on Instagram.
Probably an aerodynamic disaster in front, but the back looks pretty good.
Right off, I could see a mixture of '68 Barracuda back glass and 67 Camaro hood trim pieces. It also appears to have Ford side lights.
It looks as though it was well built. I don't see any Bondo or even fiberglass.
|
That deserves to be brought back to life and properly sheltered - what ever it is.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2020, 01:19 PM
|
#3612 (permalink)
|
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,453
Thanks: 62
Thanked 573 Times in 363 Posts
|
Quote:
|
I just saw this on Instagram.
|
I tried google lens, but it didn't help:
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
|
|
10-25-2020, 02:09 PM
|
#3613 (permalink)
|
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,216
Thanks: 2,467
Thanked 853 Times in 506 Posts
|
Someone there commented. It's a Fiberfab GT-12
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cd For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
10-25-2020, 02:54 PM
|
#3614 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 18,368
Thanks: 5,040
Thanked 6,075 Times in 4,864 Posts
|
__________________
.
The difference between science and screwin' around, is writing it down.
Adam Savage _________________
|
|
|
|
|
10-26-2020, 01:54 PM
|
#3615 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,727
Thanks: 36
Thanked 2,466 Times in 1,721 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd
Someone there commented. It's a Fiberfab GT-12
|
Probably right, but I saw something similar on Amazon Prime last night, computer animation.
Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons
( Gerry Anderson)
https://mikepigottsdiecasttoysandmod...rlet-by-corgi/
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
11-02-2020, 08:03 AM
|
#3617 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,419
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,142 Times in 561 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i
|
I would like to see these cars in a wind tunnel with smoke wands.
Does anyone else envision counter rotating vortices spiraling out from the rear like a jet fighter ?
Lol... 
>
.
__________________
Disclaimer...
I’m not a climatologist, aerodynamicist, virologist, physicist, astrodynamicist or marine biologist..
But...
I play one on the internet.
Last edited by redneck; 11-02-2020 at 08:24 AM..
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2020, 08:28 AM
|
#3618 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 3,727
Thanks: 36
Thanked 2,466 Times in 1,721 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redneck
I would like to see these cars in a wind tunnel with smoke wands.
Does anyone else envision counter rotating vortices spiraling out from the rear like a jet fighter ?
Lol... |
Actually a closer comparison would be drag reducing winglets on turbojet airliners and the Alfa Romeo BAT cars.
https://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/k-12/ai.../winglets.html
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2020, 08:57 AM
|
#3619 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,419
Thanks: 185
Thanked 1,142 Times in 561 Posts
|
.
Yes, wingtip vortices. The fighter in the picture posted show it clearly. The second picture I posted is from wake turbulence.
Sadly, there are no wind tunnel pics of the BAT cars. 
Such a pity...
 wreck it ralph wallpaper 1920x1080
>
.
__________________
Disclaimer...
I’m not a climatologist, aerodynamicist, virologist, physicist, astrodynamicist or marine biologist..
But...
I play one on the internet.
|
|
|
|
|
11-02-2020, 09:22 AM
|
#3620 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Pro
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Abilene, Texas
Posts: 68
Thanks: 6
Thanked 39 Times in 26 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead
By 1934-1/2, Carl Breer and his team had cut its drag from Cd 0.51, to Cd 0.244.
They didn't publish the results until a couple of weeks after Pearl Harbor. Folks had that to think about as we entered the Second Global Petroleum War, as we failed to learn from the first one. |
WWII was a fight for POWER, which required the need for petroleum. Japan had none and Germany had very little. Petrol was a secondary fight that became necessary after both did not manage to get enough during their first fight to steal it. Had Germany been able to make enough man-made-fuel/synthetic fuel, they would have probably won a lot of land before stopping or being stopped.
The Japanese Bushido code, Germany being embarrassed by the loss of WWI, and Italy's Mussolini all wanted POWER, and they understood oil was necessary to win. I agree it became a war for oil, but the desire for POWER will still be with us after an alternative is found.
|
|
|
|
|
