Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Motorcycles / Scooters
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-07-2014, 10:59 AM   #121 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterS View Post
A question ..

What if the ^ section / flow detacher/ turburlator was at the point of maximum lift along the side of the body ?
Then it would be always making drag.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-07-2014, 11:01 AM   #122 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Another side benefit to having a pair of nose foilers would be to get them out of the middle of the headlight beam.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 02:59 PM   #123 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 142
Thanks: 6
Thanked 53 Times in 31 Posts
Teri, most every section of a sport, technology, field of study, what have you, will have a specialized vocabulary. When you became an engineer you had to learn that a moment was not just a short period of time. From what you said at the beginning of this thread you are a newcomer to motorcycles, so you shouldn't get upset when you have to learn the new terminology.

It is my impression that bicycle and motorcycle terminology does not always match up so you can't always apply something about bicycles to motorcycles without adjusting the terms being used.

"Offset" is the amount a parallel line to the steering axis through the axle differs from the steering axis when viewed from the side. Zero offset means the steering axis goes through the axle. With common ranges of rake angle most bikes will have some amount of offset.

I think you'll also find that most motorcyclists (for at least the last half century) are going to view a "steep" rake angle as one that is closer to vertical, not one closer to horizontal. The "flop" you mention is a problem with shallow (not much rise) angles, not steep angles (closer to vertical). Road racers have steep rake angles, choppers have shallow rake angles. Choppers will have problems with "flop".

I'll agree that there are a lot of motorcyclists (and probably bicyclists but I'm not a bicyclist so I don't keep up with what is going on in that field) who don't understand the difference between rake and trail.

cheers,
Michael

Quote:
Originally Posted by Teri_TX View Post
Hi Michael,

Please don't think I'm picking on you.

Is the "offset" you referred to an imaginary line (as viewed from the side, otherwise known as elevation view) from the rotation axis of the steering axis (about the bearings in the head tube) and the wheel bearings?

<rant on>

Maybe it's me but I get awfully confused whenever bicycle and motorcycle people speak of front fork geometry. To me, it is SIMPLE GEOMETRY and nothing more, confounded by terminology concocted by the respective groups (bicycle or motorcycle).

From simple geometry, a steep rake will inherently put the center of rotation of the steering axis far ahead of the contact point of the tire unless there is a huge offset of the fork clamps or a non-parallel clamping of the forks. Most of the fork clamps I've seen appear to be interchangable (maybe not). That difference is the trail.

As an aside, a steep rake will cause what (to my knowledge) is known as "flop" which causes the front of the bike to raise and lower as the forks are rotated about the steering axis. This is a separate effect on the handling.

Bicycle people argue a lot about forks that have bent lower ends toward the front and straight bladed forks as to whether which has less or more trail. A straight bladed fork can have exactly the same trail as the bent ones if the attachment angle at the head tube is adjusted accordingly. To this engineer, it's just elementary geometry and no magical fairy dust. It's my opinion that most bicycle people are simply "geometry challenged".

<rant off>

-- Teri
__________________
http://www.eurospares.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 05:07 PM   #124 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East coast of Australia
Posts: 393

Yella Peril - '80 Mercedes 240D sedan
Thanks: 15
Thanked 41 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler View Post
Then it would be always making drag.

but spoiling lift and allowing closed sides. The question is ...would that result in less overall drag ?

Everything in this game is a compromise.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 05:13 PM   #125 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Why not just spoil the lift and not create drag by placing the foilers at the front?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 05:35 PM   #126 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: East coast of Australia
Posts: 393

Yella Peril - '80 Mercedes 240D sedan
Thanks: 15
Thanked 41 Times in 17 Posts
It could be worth a little bit of experimenting. For me the ''side lift'' is the biggest problem, especially in traffic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 06:19 PM   #127 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
the point of all this is to increase efficiency, if you destroy the flow around the airfoil then you defeat the purpose of such streamlining. The nose foiler (especially a large one) makes it look streamlined from the front but not when the wind is at an angle. Have you experimented with that approach? I'm sure it doesn't care what causes the change in wind direction (traffic, trees).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 06:33 PM   #128 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
Though, if you are looking for an experiment, perhaps active lift dumpers might be worth a shot, to see how they compare to a static nose foiler. Basically you have a sensor for relative wind direction, and a controller (very quickly) responds by moving a vertical spoiler out the "downwind" side.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 06:43 PM   #129 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
and for extra credit, when the spoiler(lift dumper) opens on one side, have the other open also to allow crossflow, might be good to have it open out as well, so it negates the one sided drag (in the wrong direction) maybe. If it could open as a "scoop" on the upwind side then even better. I have them linked here, but testing would determine the best arrangement (i.e. windspeed vs AOA map) and pivot point, plus channeling to reduce crossflow delay.

Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Untitled.jpg
Views:	239
Size:	19.0 KB
ID:	14843  

Last edited by P-hack; 04-07-2014 at 07:16 PM.. Reason: diagrams are good
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 07:08 PM   #130 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
I have actually thought about a similar concept before where you have flaps that are just barely held flush to the sir stream by magnets that are not quite touching so that the slightest pressure differential would sneak them open.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
aerodynamics, allert, vetter fuel challenge, wind tunnel testing





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com