Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2018, 05:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mpg_numbers_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,367

Toby - '13 Toyota Prius C
90 day: 61.95 mpg (US)

Daz - '15 Mazda 3 iTouring w/ Tech Package
90 day: 38.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 323
Thanked 481 Times in 366 Posts
Hm, yes, just looked it up myself on Fuelly...the LX model all with 16" wheels for 2017 averaged 45.11 MPG and the Touring all with the 18" averaged 42.87 MPG. Weird though; you would expect the EX to get between that since some have 16" and others have 18", but the EX averages 47.63. Can definitely see the difference though. Makes me want to buy pizza pans for my car...except that my car has alloys not steelies so not exactly sure how I'd mount them.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-15-2018, 06:38 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,653
Thanks: 7,764
Thanked 8,575 Times in 7,061 Posts
Heli-coil inserts and button-head cap screws.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2018, 06:44 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mpg_numbers_guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,367

Toby - '13 Toyota Prius C
90 day: 61.95 mpg (US)

Daz - '15 Mazda 3 iTouring w/ Tech Package
90 day: 38.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 323
Thanked 481 Times in 366 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Heli-coil inserts and button-head cap screws.
Yes but what would I screw them in to? Alloy wheels don't have all the holes in them like the steelies do. I thought about punching holes in the pizza pans and using zip ties, but that adds drag and kinda defeats the purpose, plus it probably wouldn't be as securely tied to go at any decent speed.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mpg_numbers_guy For This Useful Post:
freebeard (02-16-2018)
Old 02-16-2018, 01:50 PM   #14 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
All 2018 trims appear to have a 6 speed with FD 3.23, but I could not find individual gear ratios. The OEM could be varying other gears, I suppose. Or the trans could be programmed to shift at different rpm ranges.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2018, 02:36 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,653
Thanks: 7,764
Thanked 8,575 Times in 7,061 Posts
Quote:
Yes but what would I screw them in to?
More verbose: Put three to five [steel] Helicoils around the periphery of the alloy rim, evenly spaced so the cap won't go on only one way. They will allow purchase in the softer metal. If they are 1/4" or less they will be invisible from five feet if the cap it missing.

The buttonhead cap crews require an Allen wrench, but would be preferable to bright metal self-tapping screws. (use an Allen insert in an electric screwdriver, there will be 20 of them)

With steel wheels you weld on receivers for Dzeus fasteners. Then you can remove them with a coin.
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
"We're deeply sorry." -- Pfizer
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2018, 01:11 PM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
royanddoreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: glovertown nl canada
Posts: 91

z - '03 nissan 350z touring
90 day: 36.21 mpg (US)

Diniro - '18 Kia Niro Ex
90 day: 47.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
The 18” tires have a 1.1% larger o.d. also.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2018, 11:31 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
There is a poster in the Pelican parts forum named Bill Verburg that often brings up the weight issues of larger wheels expressed as a loss of torque, and the issues of larger diameter wheel/tire combinations lowering acceleration times.

This is one of many examples:
https://forums.pelicanparts.com/pors...l#post10155087

A second example - more charts on page-2
https://forums.pelicanparts.com/pors...l-choices.html

The example shown on the first page of this thread as I read it has wider wheels, this would account for higher rolling resistance and higher drag.

All this is counter intuitive, as marketing directs us to the larger heavier wider wheels as being better performance, when in fact it is often not. At least not from an engineer's viewpoint of maximizing efficiency.

A search on Bill's name and the phrase "torque"
https://forums.pelicanparts.com/sear...rchid=17996103
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html

Last edited by kach22i; 08-27-2018 at 11:40 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kach22i For This Useful Post:
ThermionicScott (08-27-2018)
Old 08-27-2018, 11:58 AM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
royanddoreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: glovertown nl canada
Posts: 91

z - '03 nissan 350z touring
90 day: 36.21 mpg (US)

Diniro - '18 Kia Niro Ex
90 day: 47.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks kach22,interesting info. I’m in the process of looking for wheels for my Kia Niro and wheel weights are hard to get. Easier than it once was but when I order online I hate to return stuff. I went to lite wheels on my car and I find it the best upgrade depending on amount of weight reduction.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2018, 02:25 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,158
Thanks: 120
Thanked 2,790 Times in 1,959 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by royanddoreen View Post
Thanks kach22,interesting info. I’m in the process of looking for wheels for my Kia Niro and wheel weights are hard to get. Easier than it once was but when I order online I hate to return stuff. I went to lite wheels on my car and I find it the best upgrade depending on amount of weight reduction.
Yea, I used to be a huge fan of electric hub motors for cars, that is until I read up on "sprung mass".

Tires do not all weigh the same given the same size, even when they have comparable speed and wear ratings.

Hard to find tire weight information for sure, easier to find for the wheels/rims.

I think one of the problems with the run flat tires is people don't like the extra sprung mass.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

Chin Spoiler:
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...effective.html

Rear Spoiler Pick Up Truck
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-t...xperiment.html

Roof Wing
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...1-a-19525.html
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2018, 02:41 PM   #20 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,440

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,207
Thanked 4,387 Times in 3,361 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
I think one of the problems with the run flat tires is people don't like the extra sprung mass.
That and weight; and the speed limitations; and the distance limitations; and that it's not a permanent fix.

There's basically no good use case for run flats unless you're driving a military vehicle, or otherwise are at risk of being shot by people pursuing you.

A plug kit, inflator, and pliers for $20 can permanently repair most tire issues in just a few minutes of time, without having to change a tire. If people are really paranoid, they can carry a spare.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com