02-15-2018, 12:12 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Thalmaturge
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,167
Thanks: 769
Thanked 646 Times in 431 Posts
|
Kia Niro shows the importance of wheels on FE
MPG in Highway/City/Combined
Code:
Package FE LX EX Touring
16” wheels 52/49/50 51/46/49 51/46/49 -
18” wheels - - 46/40/43 46/40/43
Curb weight 3106 3199 3199 3287
Roof rails No Yes Yes Yes
Look at that FE drop from the 16->18" wheels!
The difference between the FE and LX seems to be about 100 lbs in weight, and roof rails.
Last edited by samwichse; 02-15-2018 at 12:18 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to samwichse For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2018, 01:01 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,857
Thanks: 8,189
Thanked 8,963 Times in 7,403 Posts
|
Wow, tables. 
I'd be curious about the tire selection. Would a tall, narrow tire fit?
__________________
.
.Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2018, 01:16 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by samwichse
... The difference between the FE and LX seems to be about 100 lbs in weight, and roof rails.
|
Neat! But ofcourse, it is probable that there are other differences too, such as fuel map and an aero package beyond just removing roof rails.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2018, 02:15 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Thalmaturge
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,167
Thanks: 769
Thanked 646 Times in 431 Posts
|
Still, within the identical model, the fuel efficiency drops 13% for the big, non-aero wheels.
Side note, the FE/LX/EX wheels are, indeed, better aero than the Touring/18" EX wheels:
 |
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to samwichse For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-15-2018, 02:29 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: ireland
Posts: 102
Thanks: 8
Thanked 52 Times in 34 Posts
|
Do you have the claimed top speeds for those models?
The more aerodynamic versions should have a higher top speed.
In Europe Dacia sells a hatchback car called the Sandero.
They also have a version called the Sandero Stepway which has bigger wheels and appears to be jacked up in the air slightly to give it a slight SUV look.
Interestingly, Dacia provides CDA data for these 2 versions, with the conventional hatchback coming in at 0.76 and the Stepway at 0.91.
Thats works out to be 19.7% extra aero drag for the Stepway.
Dacia charges an extra 1500 euro for the Stepway.
https://www.dacia.co.uk/vehicles/our...ml#grade-52B-1
https://www.dacia.co.uk/vehicles/our...52B-0|overview |
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cr45 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-15-2018, 05:38 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,935
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cr45
The more aerodynamic versions should have a higher top speed.
|
It may be easier to reach the top speed and sustain it, but if it retains the same gearing of the less aerodynamic versions it may not have a so noticeably higher top speed. |
|
|
|
|
02-15-2018, 05:47 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Thalmaturge
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,167
Thanks: 769
Thanked 646 Times in 431 Posts
|
As it's a hybrid, the top speed is probably electronically limited.
|
|
|
|
|
02-15-2018, 05:49 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: VA
Posts: 1,372
Thanks: 324
Thanked 483 Times in 368 Posts
|
Are there any other cars with such MPG discrepancies based on wheels alone? And do you know if this is just the company's estimate or if it was actually verified by the EPA? As far as I knew wheels only affected 1 mpg, at most 2, and that was regular wheels converted to solid caps (i.e. pizza pans).
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to mpg_numbers_guy For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-15-2018, 06:00 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Thalmaturge
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: The edge of nowhere
Posts: 1,167
Thanks: 769
Thanked 646 Times in 431 Posts
|
|
|
|
|
|
