Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2013, 12:18 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 14
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lean Burn -vs- Cylinder Drop

Just brainstorming here. I'm about to move my '89 BMW 325i into the modern era with a Megasquirt 3/Expanded, which, amongst many other things, will allow me to run sequential fuel injection and wasted-spark (or COP) ignition. I also noticed while I was setting up the initial tuning, that there are options to drop random cylinders per event (i.e. remove fuel pulse from 2 cylinders per revolution), as well as dual-mapping (i.e. one "normal" fuel map, hot-switchable with another map tuned to whatever AFR I choose).

Assuming no cost difference between the two, and ignoring the detrimental effects of a lean-burning engine on a catalytic converter (because this is a "theoretical car" that I drive 40 miles a day in with no catalytic converters), What's the general consensus on Lean Burn vs Dropping random cylinders?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-21-2013, 12:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 14
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
and... I just noticed that I've never posted here before (????)

Hey guys! I'm Jeremy. I fix (and build) BMW's for a living. I should say, for the sake of "full disclosure" that I drive fast and hard. I'm not a hypermiler by any means, but if I can make 500 horsepower and still get 25-30 MPG, I'm a happy guy. If I can get it to 50 mpg, I'll be a rich guy.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013, 01:37 AM   #3 (permalink)
Aero Deshi
 
ChazInMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Vero Beach, FL
Posts: 1,065

MagMetalCivic - '04 Honda Civic Sedan EX
Last 3: 34.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 430
Thanked 669 Times in 358 Posts
Welcome. My understanding is that the cylinder cut out thing gains milage by reducing pumping losses. It makes the displacement of the engine smaller, therefore the throttle has to open more, thus your pumping loss goes down. Since pumping losses are not a huge loss to begin with, you are not likely to realize a very dramatic gain.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013, 03:42 AM   #4 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 829
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
If you can physically deactivate the intake and exhaust valves on the cylinders to be cut out, then cutting out cylinders is viable. Otherwise, stick to just doing lean burn.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013, 10:15 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 14
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChazInMT View Post
Welcome. My understanding is that the cylinder cut out thing gains milage by reducing pumping losses. It makes the displacement of the engine smaller, therefore the throttle has to open more, thus your pumping loss goes down. Since pumping losses are not a huge loss to begin with, you are not likely to realize a very dramatic gain.
we cut cylinder activation by removing fuel pulse, so if we're removing 2 cylinders out of 6, we gain 33% economy (excluding the pumping loss of compressing the cut cylinders) right off the bat, plus the lower pumping loss of the "more open" throttle body.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013, 10:23 AM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
2000neon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 596

VX - '94 Honda Civic VX
Team Honda
90 day: 47.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 133
Thanked 89 Times in 66 Posts
In theory yes, but in practice no, you wouldn't see a 33% improvement but cutting only fuel to 2 cylinders (and not closing keeping both valves shut). The amount of energy required to pump air into the "dead" cylinders, compress the air, and then pump it back out through the exhaust negates a lot of the gain. You may still see a small improvement, but the biggest bang-for-your-buck would be lean burn.

When factory engines de-activate cylinders, not only do they cut fuel, the also close both the intake and exhaust valves creating an 'air spring' inside the cylinder. It takes energy to compress the air during the upstroke of the piston, but some of that is regained on the down stroke. This is the most efficient way to do it, and even in these applications, cutting 2 cylinders from a V8 does not result in 25% more fuel economy, because there are energy losses in the system.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013, 10:30 AM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienBlood View Post
we cut cylinder activation by removing fuel pulse, so if we're removing 2 cylinders out of 6, we gain 33% economy (excluding the pumping loss of compressing the cut cylinders) right off the bat, plus the lower pumping loss of the "more open" throttle body.
I KNEW THIS WAS COMING!!!

...but I'm gonna be super nice and refrain from posting what I really think.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013, 01:35 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ellington, ct
Posts: 830
Thanks: 44
Thanked 104 Times in 80 Posts
Nice?

How the hell is that nice?

Stop teasing us Frank and tell us what you think!
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013, 01:53 PM   #9 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 829
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I KNEW THIS WAS COMING!!!

...but I'm gonna be super nice and refrain from posting what I really think.
Okay... Who are you? And what have you done with Frank?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2013, 02:32 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
3-Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 829

AlienMobile - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 80.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 101
Thanked 563 Times in 191 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000neon View Post
...This is the most efficient way to do it, and even in these applications, cutting 2 cylinders from a V8 does not result in 25% more fuel economy, because there are energy losses in the system.
Yes, like piston and ring friction losses and so on.

If you check out engines that have used cylinder cutout, the economy gain probably less than 10%. And this is for a V-8 switching to four cylinders on the highway.

I don't typically follow this closely, because the gains are not as large as lean burn, which I have in the Insight.

The lean burn gain is more like 20% or so.

Jim.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 3-Wheeler For This Useful Post:
2000neon (02-21-2013), t vago (02-21-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com