Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-19-2016, 05:38 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 2,668

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touraeg
Thanks: 305
Thanked 1,187 Times in 813 Posts
The way I do it is to atomize my fuel with an injector in each intake runner. Then the valve opens and the piston sucks it in to a very hot cylinder where as its compressed 11 times normal becomes a vapor. Then the spark plug lights it off.
The other way I used to do it on my pickup was by running propane which easily flashes to a vapor without heating.
Why you would want to do it outside of the saftey of the combustion chamber with regular gasoline is a mystery.

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
ChazInMT (12-20-2016)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-19-2016, 07:03 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 799
Thanks: 4
Thanked 66 Times in 58 Posts
done

Last edited by racprops; 02-17-2017 at 03:08 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to racprops For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (12-19-2016)
Old 12-19-2016, 07:12 PM   #13 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,571 Times in 2,835 Posts
Then why don't propane engines get a huge MPG boost over gasoline engines?
After all propane is a vapor.
Propane is a super heated vapor at atmospheric pressure at room temperature. You are trying to turn gasoline into a super heated vapor.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
Fingie (12-20-2016), Xist (12-21-2016)
Old 12-19-2016, 08:47 PM   #14 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by racprops View Post
For the past couple of decades I have found reports of super high mileage cars running on 100% gasoline vapor.

Numbers in the 80 to 120 MPG out of old V8s are most common.

Most of these old vapor systems have many faults, the biggest one being heating gasoline in a can to get vapor…which can work fine but any leakage of the vapor and boom.

A common mistake is to use the exhaust heat to vaporize the gasoline, this fails because ones the ICE IS on vapor it cools down cutting the exhaust heat and the car stalls.

The numbers do not lie, an ICE only uses about 30% of the incoming fuel to move the car, the rest is burned after the power stroke and during exhaust and is where all the heat the cooling system must handle comes from.

A correctly controlled vapor system COULD burn only what is needed to produce the power stroke and have no left over burning fuel after the power stroke.

Thus it is possible to save/not use some 60 to 70% or the fuel currently need to power the car.

That is you would only use about 30 to 40% of what you now use.
Old V8s were lucky to ever crack 20 mpg. But let's be charitable and use 20.

Let's also be charitable ('tis the season) and say we'll save 60%, or use 40% of the 20:

20 / .4 = 50 mpg

That's a long way from 80-120 mpg. In fact it's an exponentially long way.

There must be an error in my analysis.

A little help please!
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 12-19-2016 at 09:16 PM.. Reason: because numbers don't lie
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Xist (12-21-2016)
Old 12-19-2016, 09:45 PM   #15 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,571 Times in 2,835 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Old V8s were lucky to ever crack 20 mpg. But let's be charitable and use 20.

Let's also be charitable ('tis the season) and say we'll save 60%, or use 40% of the 20:

20 / .4 = 50 mpg

That's a long way from 80-120 mpg. In fact it's an exponentially long way.

There must be an error in my analysis.

A little help please!
Extraordinary claims need extraordinary evidence.
Those 100mpg V8 carburetor engine guys were always big on claims, short on proof.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
100MPGUS (01-13-2017), Xist (12-21-2016)
Old 12-19-2016, 09:57 PM   #16 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
Maybe you'd be better off with a heated intake manifold, like some older dedicated-ethanol cars in Brazil used to have. In gassers, this setup had been used in the Fiat 124-series engines.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 09:58 PM   #17 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
The big old American V8s all had that.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 10:11 PM   #18 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
So, since a heated intake manifold couldn't do any "miracle", what else could be attempted? Though I'm not so sure if a vaporizer like the ones used in some LPG conversions would be so safe at all, it seems to be the last option I would eventually consider for an attempt to run on gasoline vapors.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2016, 10:16 PM   #19 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
They not only had exhaust crossover passages that routed hot exhaust under the carb, they had thermostatically controlled hot air intakes on the air cleaner snorkel.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
Xist (12-21-2016)
Old 12-19-2016, 10:21 PM   #20 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
They not only had exhaust crossover passages that routed hot exhaust under the carb, they had thermostatically controlled hot air intakes on the air cleaner snorkel.
The Fiat 124-series engine and dedicated-ethanol variants of other small engines resorted to the engine coolant to heat the intake manifold instead of exhaust crossover passages.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
lies, scam





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com