Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-14-2014, 12:28 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Dave,

Lowering it that much reduces the frontal area a lot, but doesn't cause the air to compress under the vehicle. But lowering 1/2"-1" on a car is not going to affect the frontal area much, and the air under the car can cause higher drag because of compression of the turbulence.

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-14-2014, 03:08 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,695
Thanks: 7,775
Thanked 8,584 Times in 7,068 Posts
A reasonable test case might be an air-bagged vehicle (with some instantaneous mileage read-out). In a single pass down a straight, level road with constant wind conditions, one could vary ride height and angle of attack, repeatedly. The readout wouldn't even have to be precise so long as it be consistent.

Instead of an A-B test it would be a-b-a-b-a-b-a-b-..... But it might require laser range finders or something to measure the ride height on the fly.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com