Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-18-2012, 10:39 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491

OurInsight - '06 Honda Insight
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
Add one more to the list:

G/GT record holder at Bonneville.
Interesting, but Moonies are a knee jerk at Bonneville. Where's the wind tunnel data

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-18-2012, 11:10 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
So, if you already have the moon caps, test the buggers! Try something like 80-40mph and see if they show up. Remember, the higher the speed, the more difference aeromods will make and the easier it will be to see them in test data. Maybe try an ABABA?
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 08:47 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Smooth and flat is better than smooth and domed. The convex dome sticks out and has more drag than flat covers. As long as you're trying to improve things, go flat and smooth.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 10:12 AM   #14 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
I'm pretty sure Phil has posted before that a convex wheel cover/shape is better. I'll search around to see what I can find. Can you point to a source for flat being better?

EDIT: found the post - it's not conclusive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
I dug into my mess.I'd read an explicit argument somewhere about the merits of the convex vs flat covers,however did not,or could not copy the article,so I don't have it.
So all I can do is default to Shinella's R&D of the Trans Am at Lockheed,Marrietta.They got numbers for an open steel wheel,a vented flat wheel cover,the same cover taped closed,and Shinella's
secret weapon discs which shaved another 0.003 off the Cd.
The production covers are convex and also vented and no data are presented for them,nor are the secret covers shown.
Since Ultralite sports a shallow convex,minimally perforated cover,and at 100-mpg,being fully optimized for low Cd,I would be comfortable with the notion that the crown of the convex cover has a distinct advantage over the flat.
We're splitting hairs though I think.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 12:19 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 115
Thanks: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 25 Posts
Not that it would be an ideal wheel from a weight perspective, but for those running stock steel wheels that accept a stainless beauty ring -- would it not be a very simple mod to first fasten (screw/rivet) the Moon (or similar) disk to the beauty ring, and allow the spring tension of the beauty ring to hold the disk/ring to the wheel (it was designed to do so)? This would seem to minimize some of the downside/difficulty in using/mounting/servicing wheels with disks. No?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 12:23 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491

OurInsight - '06 Honda Insight
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beau View Post
Not that it would be an ideal wheel from a weight perspective, but for those running stock steel wheels that accept a stainless beauty ring -- would it not be a very simple mod to first fasten (screw/rivet) the Moon (or similar) disk to the beauty ring, and allow the spring tension of the beauty ring to hold the disk/ring to the wheel (it was designed to do so)? This would seem to minimize some of the downside/difficulty in using/mounting/servicing wheels with disks. No?
I think that would work, but why not just buy the clip on Moons. They have little steel fingers and mount like a regular hubcap. I knew one guy who had trouble keeping them on, but others experience is that they work fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 12:29 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 115
Thanks: 4
Thanked 45 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jime57 View Post
I think that would work, but why not just buy the clip on Moons. They have little steel fingers and mount like a regular hubcap. I knew one guy who had trouble keeping them on, but others experience is that they work fine.
Only because I have been told the failure rate with the clip-ons actually staying clipped on has not been good. No other reason.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 12:33 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491

OurInsight - '06 Honda Insight
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
In the case of the Insight, I'm a Honda believer. I deeply suspect that they did the best that they could in the wind tunnel. It is true that the current wheel has some minor styling touches, and some small spoke slits, but it works very well with the current fender design, which incidently is far different than your "normal" car. If I had to venture a guess, and we are all guessing at this point, I'd guess that a FLAT cover would make a small, very small, improvement. If I test I'll do that first The Moons stick out way too far.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 02:28 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beau View Post
Not that it would be an ideal wheel from a weight perspective, but for those running stock steel wheels that accept a stainless beauty ring -- would it not be a very simple mod to first fasten (screw/rivet) the Moon (or similar) disk to the beauty ring, and allow the spring tension of the beauty ring to hold the disk/ring to the wheel (it was designed to do so)? This would seem to minimize some of the downside/difficulty in using/mounting/servicing wheels with disks. No?
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post332964

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 06:06 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491

OurInsight - '06 Honda Insight
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
OK, I'm warming to the idea of testing the Moons. I did a measurement with crushed aluminum foil behid the Moons and found that they are only .6" more into the airstream. I'm trying to find a way to mount them temporarily without drilling my wheels - for the time being.

I went out looking for a test course. Richmond is terrible with hills, but I think I found an essentially flat section I can use. I did a few experimental 70-50mph coastdown runs and I think the course will work ok. Perfectly flat would be better, but that just isn't available anywhere around here.

I do have one technical problem. How in blue blazes do I mark the end of the coastdown at 50 MPH? Remember, I'm going 50 so I can't just step out and put a chalk mark on the road

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com