Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-28-2013, 06:07 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
If our engines were external combustion instead of internal combustion, they wouldn't care what fuel they burn and they wouldn't need a transmission at all.

__________________
Work From Home mod has saved more fuel than everything else put together.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-28-2013, 06:48 PM   #12 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Battery-powered vehicles made a comeback, why not steam (tell that to Bill Lear)???
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 08:17 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
In their 2006 research paper the EPA predicted an 80% increase in fuel mileage through powertrain improvements alone. Combining all other predicted improvements the total gain in mileage was 120%, with the powertrain still responsible for 80 of that 120%.

regards
Mech
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	013.JPG
Views:	29
Size:	88.1 KB
ID:	13096  
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 09:51 PM   #14 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
When I swapped a manual transmission into my 300D, a 30mpg car became a 40mpg car. One more gear and no torque converter loss makes quite a difference.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 09:53 PM   #15 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
EPA pedicted improvements: Theory routinely achieves 100% efficiency, reality never achieves 100% efficiency.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-28-2013, 11:30 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Kind of like the predictions of battery technology improvements from 7 years ago.

regards
Mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 05:08 AM   #17 (permalink)
Lots of Questions
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: San Jose
Posts: 665

Motor-Rolla - '01 Toyota Corolla LE
Team Toyota
90 day: 28.3 mpg (US)

Gaia - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 19.78 mpg (US)

Gaia - Round 2 - '99 Toyota 4runner SR5 Highlander
90 day: 17.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 343
Thanked 101 Times in 79 Posts
So as a recap and to make sure I have this right:

1. The big hog isn't the transmission as much as it is the torque converter. After you guys mentioned the TC, I've been watching some videos about torque converters (thank heaven for Youtube!). Basically, the less "slippage" the TC has the more efficient (albeit w/ minor driver discomfort).

2. Highly generic and oversimplified order of efficiency: manual (good driver)> dual clutch auto (driver can manually switch gears if need be)> centrifugal clutch CVT> torque converter CVT (if that's a thing)> locking torque converter auto > old automatics (with lots of slip)
[and somewhere in there would be the inefficiencies of lower amount of gears vs. higher amount of gears (i.e. 2, 3, 4 gears vs. 5, 6, 7, 8 & 9 gears)]

Q's:
  • Can a manual swap really produce an increase of 10MPG?!
  • Many of the videos I watched mentioned the TC will increase the torque put out by the engine. Can someone explain how that works exactly and is there a way to increase the amount it increases it by (i.e. an electric motor which forces more fluid through faster, or something)?
  • Does the ATF in the TC ever leave the TC and back into the trans. pan or is it just revolving back and forth between the pump and turbine?
  • In an automatic, is there a such thing as too many gears? I guess if you were planning on having a lot, then a CVT would be better?
  • According to Wikipedia, the dual clutch is an automatic, but the driver has the ability to manually shift (with automatic shifting, no clutch) I've seen these before, with the gear shifter having extra gear options, but did not know what gave it that ability. So a DCT is sorta like a manumatic?

Thanks as always for the help!
__________________
Don't forget to like our Facebook page!




Best EM Quotes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
It has been said, that if you peel the duct tape back on Earth's equator, you'll find that the two hemispheres are held together with J B Weld.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan9 View Post
subscribed with a soda.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
If you're burning,and someone throws gasoline on you,there will be a localized cooling effect, but you're still on fire.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 05:26 AM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
A DCT is a clutch-type transmission. It's more properly termed as a robotic clutch transmission (like BMW's SMG), only there's two clutches and two separate sets of gears... so while one gearset is coming out of gear, the other one is already in gear, and all you need to do is to release one clutch and activate another for a near-instantaneous shift.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 08:26 AM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
justme1969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: ff
Posts: 459
Thanks: 59
Thanked 38 Times in 30 Posts
I disagree fully

If we all drove pencil shaped cars and were not spoiled by sitting inside Giant caverns then engine displacement overall would / will drop.
Smaller compartments = less storage so economy would/ will rise and cars could get solar chaser type economy... some day...
And then Ill be living on the moon.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-29-2013, 09:39 AM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
RobertISaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: camden, MI
Posts: 324

MC SBX - '95 Chevrolet Monte Carlo LS
Last 3: 29.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 55 Times in 46 Posts
i know GM made at least one CVT with a torque converter(think it was a joint venture with toyota?).... i want to say it was continuously locked above ~10MPH.

a torque converter can multiply torque... it's kind of strange to think about though. in any case, when it's multiplying torque, it's also slipping to the point of stall, which is not what anybody interested in efficiency would be interested in. see: Torque converter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ATF in the torque converter moves around quite a bit. if it didn't, whenever the torque converter clutch locked, small amounts of clutch material would shed off every time. if it never got pushed out and filtered, it would build up and cause issues.

too many gears? depends on who you ask. if you like constant shifting to keep at BSFC peak, you can never have enough gears. anything above 6 feels excessive to me, even then, calibration dependant. there are both good and bad 6 speed autos.

dual clutch = a more complicated manual transmission that has the PCM/TCM controlling the clutch and shifter. so, to the driver, it's an automatic. ability to command shifts is not DCT specific, nor a requirement.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RobertISaar For This Useful Post:
jeff88 (05-29-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com