03-04-2009, 07:23 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
MPG losses from car stereo ?
I searched previous threads, but did a quick, sloppy job, so I may have missed it ........ so, here is the question :
If I replace my car stereo with a NORMAL stereo and speakers ( no huge mega subwoofers )
What kind of mileage drop should I expect while using the stereo ?
O.K. Just for comparison, WHAT IF I did go all out and install a fancy subwoofer and all ?
What kind of mileage drop should I expect then ?
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 07:28 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
Normal stereos don't pull much juice thankfully. I can't speak for a mega setup.
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 07:32 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Legend in my own mind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Homestead, Fl.
Posts: 927
Thanks: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
Even in a mega stereo configuration, your mpg loses will likely be drawn from the weight of the equipment. That then would depend on the weight of the components, like box, amps, speakers, sound deadening.
__________________
Thx NoCO2; "The biggest FE mod you can make is to adjust the nut behind the wheel"
I am a precisional instrument of speed and aeromatics
If your knees bent in the opposite direction......what would a chair look like???
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 07:36 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 593
Thanks: 106
Thanked 114 Times in 72 Posts
|
A "normal" stereo, as in an aftermarket head unit pushing aftermarket speakers in factory locations will draw between 2 and 6 amps of current at normal listening volumes, peaking as high as 12 or so amps under the heaviest of loads, momentarily.
This isn't much at all, nor is the weight significant - I would consider its impact on fuel consumption trivial at best.
Throw a modest subwoofer and modest amplifier in the mix (not the kind of thing you hear 6 blocks away... just adequate augmentation to a normal stereo) and you're still under 10 amps typical current consumption at less than full volume listening.
The guys who are really serious about car audio might have systems drawing over 250 amps of current and subwoofer enclosures weighing over 400 lbs.... but that's probably not what you were asking about
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 07:39 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 92
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
if youre crazy like me, you can rip out all your speakers but the one by the driver door. minimize that power draw
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 09:26 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
I have only one speaker too. All mine were blown, so I removed all but the least blown ones.
It really sucks when listening to songs recorded in stereo.
Still looking for someone who's replaced their factory 6.5 inch round speakers to replace my fronts.
|
|
|
03-05-2009, 10:22 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
|
I find the losses from the radio are not from the power draw, but from the distraction. I can't focus as well and so I don't hypermile as well.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-05-2009, 10:43 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Harebrained Idea Skeptic
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 211
Thanks: 19
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
If both of the stereos are outputting the same volume, the difference is probably nil -- not worth worrying about.
If you're concerned about weight, have you looked at your own bodily weight? Reducing that will bring benefits to any vehicle you ride in, and consuming less will mean fewer trips to the grocery and overall less impact to the environment.
__________________
|
|
|
03-05-2009, 11:54 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
1 HP = 746 watts. I see typical stereos advertising 200 watts/channel, so if you crank the volume to the max (goodbye, eardrums!) you could theoretically lose about half a horsepower.
Of course in the real world, you'll be using less than that even at full volume, because the sound level will vary...
|
|
|
03-05-2009, 01:18 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
Hi James,
There is probably very little connection between what an amplifier is rated at, and what it actually is able put out into a dynamic load (the loudspeaker and it's crossover). Also, there will be losses since no amp Class A/B amp can be very efficient, by definition.
|
|
|
|