Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2010, 11:54 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
Check this very site for such a list...

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-25-2010, 12:54 AM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 111
Thanks: 10
Thanked 20 Times in 13 Posts
"...ah come on now, just come out and "say it" -- bigger butts need bigger cars!"

Thus the reason I argue for a two seat tandem. Make the care 2/3 as wide but only one seat. Thus the driver has more "elbow" room (or butt room, if needed).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 10:05 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: london, on
Posts: 355

Buggie - '01 Vw Beetle TDI Gls
Thanks: 4
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
now why is this car not availible here?

Audi A2 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I just read through this, am I reading something wrong or are all sportscars less aerodynamic? seems a camry is more aerodynamic then a corvette
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automob...ag_coefficient

Last edited by bandit86; 04-25-2010 at 10:20 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 10:27 AM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: green bay WI
Posts: 52
Thanks: 7
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
I dont know why Government motors or Suzuki pull the old Metro off the shelf and update it to the new crash specs. I know I would buy a new one for 10-12K. Hell they could even bring back the XFI. I think that model would be spot on for the market now. But then again they may have to sell more Metro's than Suburbans to make money. God knows GM doesnt want to loose its image as a full size car company.
__________________
94 Geo Metro 52-56 MPG
06 Jetta TDI 46-48 MPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 11:42 AM   #15 (permalink)
Basjoos Wannabe
 
ShadeTreeMech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 870

The Van - '97 Mercury Villager gs
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

Lyle the Kindly Viking - '99 Volvo V70
90 day: 25.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 49 Times in 32 Posts
I think your answer to the question of sportscars being less aerodynamic can be found in the article quoted above.

"For best cornering and racing performance, as required in Formula One cars, downforce and stability are crucial and these cars must attempt to maximize downforce and maintain stability while attempting to minimize the overall Cd value"

quoted from wikipedia

A camry isn't designed to corner at high speeds as well as a Corvette. For example, my Maxima corrners very well, but will understeer if pushed too hard. If I were to add a front spoiler, air pressure would press the tires into the pavement allowing me to go a bit faster without understeering. BUT it would make the maxima less aerodynamic.

I was reading a good and very well detailed article on here mentioning the mods that had been made to a 1st gen Prius in Aussie. They talked about how adding a partial belly pan under the front bumper added a bit of instability; ie the steering got light at speed. the reason is the angle the air hit their pan caused lift and taking weight off the front tires. They added some of those aerodynamic wedges found on the back of an Evo to the underside and that stabilized it, possibly from disrupting the air flow.

reading that article helped me to realize simply adding a pan would be a bad idea without first adding an airdam under the front bumper to either induce a bit of downforce or make it aerodynamically neutral. I do too much steering in the Ozark mountains to afford to ignore the need to go around a corner at speed.
__________________
RIP Maxima 1997-2012


Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I think you missed the point I was trying to make, which is that it's not rational to do either speed or fuel economy mods for economic reasons. You do it as a form of recreation, for the fun and for the challenge.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 01:26 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShadeTreeMech View Post
"For best cornering and racing performance, as required in Formula One cars, downforce and stability are crucial..."
But we're not talking about Formula 1 cars here, but about sports cars. And not in the "stuff a humongous engine in it so it'll go fast in a straight line" sense, either. Real sports cars get driven on twisty roads, where you seldom if ever reach speeds where aerodynamic downforces would be significant.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (04-25-2010)
Old 04-25-2010, 02:36 PM   #17 (permalink)
ECO-Evolution
 
Lazarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482

Iron Horse (retired) - '97 Iron horse Intrepid

Ninja - '08 Kawasaki 250R
90 day: 76.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 45 Times in 34 Posts
It's not a government conspiracy it what the vast majority of people want to buy in the US. Do you see any sub compacs in here?

Top 10 sellers in the US in 2009.
Quote:
Top 10 sellers
1. Ford F-Series: 179,632 6. Honda Civic: 118,459
2. Toyota Camry: 150,242 7. Nissan Altima: 96,428
3. Chevrolet Silverado: 149,949 8. Dodge Ram: 94,516
4. Honda Accord: 131,043 9. Ford Fusion: 85,146
5. Toyota Corolla: 121,643 10. Honda CR-V: 78,917
53% of the vehicles sold were pickups. That's in a very depressed economy.
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."

  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 04:06 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: london, on
Posts: 355

Buggie - '01 Vw Beetle TDI Gls
Thanks: 4
Thanked 37 Times in 27 Posts
there was a 6 month waiting list for the smart cars whenI went to the dealer. subcompact can be cool, even if it's a little $$ er
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 10:51 PM   #19 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
If it's the government's fault that consumers prefer gas hogs whenever their budgets allow it, then yes it's a government conspiracy.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2010, 11:11 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
blownb310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 476

Saab EV - '19 Chevy Bolt EV LT

Pierre - '07 ZENN MC2 Base
Thanks: 178
Thanked 89 Times in 45 Posts
It could also be that alot of us hypermilers are tight wads too. I have to admit that even if a new 70 mpg diesel economy hatchback came out next year, I wouldn't buy one. I usually wait until a car is 10 years old before I buy it for pennies on the dollar.

Mike

__________________
2007 ZENN and 2019 Chevy Bolt EV 145,000 oil free miles to date.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Government 4500 cash for clunkers.. what to get ebacherville General Efficiency Discussion 56 06-28-2009 06:57 PM
The government isn't just sitting on its butt! wwkayaker Fossil Fuel Free 0 07-10-2008 09:52 AM
what happened to the geo metro?/big car & big oil conspiracy? joesgot4 EcoModding Central 21 07-07-2008 03:33 PM
Canadian government caves in to automakers and kills auto efficiency rebate program MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 12 04-01-2008 07:19 PM
Federal Government Considering Fuel Tax Increase RH77 The Lounge 31 01-22-2008 06:44 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com