Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-05-2013, 12:06 AM   #81 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
nathan01xl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: pdx
Posts: 153

The Long Ranger - '01 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

EcoSI - '08 Honda Civic SI
90 day: 28.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 26 Posts
MAF cleaned today, hoping to see an improvement on this tank

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-05-2013, 09:40 AM   #82 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501

XJ Cherokee - '00 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 12.96 mpg (US)

FoFO - '11 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 36.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
If the MAF was never cleaned before, you will definitely have an improvement.

I've never bought the security bit though. I just spray directly onto the MAF then let it sit and dry. Then start the car up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2013, 09:45 PM   #83 (permalink)
radioranger
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Canton CT
Posts: 442
Thanks: 140
Thanked 44 Times in 33 Posts
what did you clean the mass air flow sensor with and how did it work out so far,
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2013, 01:24 AM   #84 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
nathan01xl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: pdx
Posts: 153

The Long Ranger - '01 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

EcoSI - '08 Honda Civic SI
90 day: 28.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by radioranger View Post
what did you clean the mass air flow sensor with and how did it work out so far,
MAF cleaner... comes in an aerosol can, available at any auto parts store. haven't put enough miles on to notice a significant different yet. but since the oil change, cleaning the throttle body, IAC, and MAF i do notice the engine running smoother, especially at startup.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 12:11 AM   #85 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
nathan01xl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: pdx
Posts: 153

The Long Ranger - '01 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

EcoSI - '08 Honda Civic SI
90 day: 28.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 26 Posts
fresh tank of gas yesterday and 45.5 mpg on the way home from work. my air dam and skirts are off at the moment after lowering the truck. i filled up with gas from a different station this tank and am wondering if that may have something to do with it...
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 12:01 PM   #86 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by nathan01xl View Post
fresh tank of gas yesterday and 45.5 mpg on the way home from work. my air dam and skirts are off at the moment after lowering the truck. i filled up with gas from a different station this tank and am wondering if that may have something to do with it...
Did you lower the truck more? If I remember correctly, didn't you already have it lowered 3in front, 5in rear?
__________________
OIF Vet
'03 Ford Ranger 4X4 lifted, 4.0L, 33in tires, plywood tonneau = 18MPG Best Tank
'92 Ford Ranger 2wd stock 3.0L with at least 189,000 miles! = 23MPG Best Tank
'99 Ford Ranger 4x4, stock 3.0L SOLD............................. = 25MPG Best Tank
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2013, 08:07 PM   #87 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
nathan01xl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: pdx
Posts: 153

The Long Ranger - '01 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

EcoSI - '08 Honda Civic SI
90 day: 28.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 26 Posts
it was lowered 2" front and 3" rear, now lowered about 4" front and 4.5" rear, rides about 2"" high in the rear stock so about 1.5" high in the rear now. which is appropriate since it is a truck
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2013, 12:49 PM   #88 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
nathan01xl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: pdx
Posts: 153

The Long Ranger - '01 Ford Ranger XL
Pickups
90 day: 28.68 mpg (US)

EcoSI - '08 Honda Civic SI
90 day: 28.83 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 37 Times in 26 Posts


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2013, 02:45 PM   #89 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Chico CA
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have a 2004 Ram with 5.7 which is loaded down as a service truck. MPG mixed but mostly city driving 10.3 mpg. Front of the truck at hwy speed seemed to surg and lift. About 4 years ago as an old racer I found that the fog light delete vents were packing air up under the fender. Grabbed a sawzall an cut vents into the wheel well. MPG went to 11.0 with the surg and lift solved.
Have added directional vents at the wheel well to create an air curtain across the front wheel. Cut air intakes into the front bumper to relieve the high pressure which is vented into lower wheel well, 2 inch tube aimed down and out in front of the wheel.
installed a Extang Encore Tonneau Cover. fresh air intake, and an under belly pan back to the front sway bar. mpg ranges between 13.5 an 13.8, as a busness man all mods must be very subtle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2013, 09:33 PM   #90 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
MPGsteward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: kansas
Posts: 42

Project Ranger - '07 Ford Ranger XLT
90 day: 33.69 mpg (US)

Lead Sled - '94 Mazda B2200
Thanks: 4
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Looks really good lowered more. Wish I could lower my ranger, but Have to be able to put some heavy weight into it. keep us updated on mpg improvements from lowering.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com