Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-20-2010, 10:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
my plans, going for a 30+mpg ranger XLT v6

so here is the start (gotta start somewhere)
this isnt going to be a short duration project as Im both limited on time and funds. but over the course of my project Im hoping to share with others.

here is the platform Im going to be working with, as it stands now:


and here is where Id like to go as a start.


the above image is just a mockup and the actual aerolid will not look exactly like that, it doesnt show the larger front air dam nor the full length bellypan. I am also planning on adding side skirts and tire blocks. possibly even wheel covers, just not sure about that as yet.


Last edited by d0sitmatr; 10-21-2010 at 10:17 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-21-2010, 12:23 AM   #2 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
Like the way it looks.

When ready for tires, stock size (rim width as well) and tire tread that essentially matches rim (published numbers) in an LT or XL tire would be my choice.

New shock absorbers as well as polyurethane anti-roll bar bushings. Transient response will be a bit tighter with ideal tire pressures (not overinflated).

I'd also check steering for dead center. A loaded -- wandering -- work truck really hurts itself due to worn componentry and load-induced alignment changes.

TIMBRENS might be good if wheelwell height measurements show up under a load. (What does that stuff weigh on a decent job? Or is it mainly the bulk involved?)

Last edited by slowmover; 10-21-2010 at 12:34 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 03:03 AM   #3 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098

The Clunker (retired) - '90 Honda Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)

Zippy - '10 Kymco Agility 125
90 day: 65.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
What are you getting now? Stick or automatic? 2wd or 4wd?
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 10:16 AM   #4 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
slowmover
I most likely wont change the tires/rims
at the moment, the rims are stock radius@ 15", but they are a tad wider, and the ties are very much oversized.
I will keep them for 2 main reasons.
1. the truck handles 100 times better
2. they close up the gap quite well between tire/fender. (just an inch of opening on the front and about 2.5-3 inches rear)
I redid the entire suspension about 4 yrs ago, so all those things have been done
but I will be taking the truck in soon for dead center as Im pretty sure it isnt at the moment.
as far as weight goes, they can weigh a lot, think 2,000 lbs give or take. but I hardly ever carry that much weight, maybe 400-500 lbs is the avg.

clev
2wd automatic (4 spd w/ OD)
at this time, Im averaging between 24-25mpg hwy, and maybe 18-19 city with very conservative driving.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2010, 12:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
I updated the mockup of where Id like to take my aeromods
barring the front end which I still have to make a few considerations, this is very close to what the truck will look like once Im finished.
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2010, 12:20 PM   #6 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
something I noticed this morning on my hood and the tonneu I currently have
the condensation on the hood, after a few minutes of driving, did a pretty good split as it ran along the hood, the split occurred a good 18" from the windshield itself, I'll try and grab a pic of it tomorrow, depending on how much condensation we have overnight.

on the tonneu cover, there seems to be only a small portion which retains any airflow that isnt towards the rear of the truck, encompassing about maybe a 25-30" radius 2 feet off the cab. the water directly behind the cab itself seemed completely untouched, as well as the water that dropped off the back edge of the tonneu.
again, I will try for some pics tomorrow.

this was after a 5 minute drive (2.5 there n back) at 45-50mph while taking my son to school.
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2010, 12:34 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foothills near Denver
Posts: 279

RSX2fast4mpg - '02 Acura RSX Type S
90 day: 38.22 mpg (US)

bubbatrucker - '98 Chevrolet K1500
90 day: 18.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts
Depending on how and where you drive, are the mudflaps even necessary? They're definitely a disadvantage aerodymically. That was my very first ecomod, delete the mudflaps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2010, 02:55 PM   #8 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
#2 would be to smooth the underside. Most trucks are chock full of rough airflow underneath.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2010, 03:18 PM   #9 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
the mudlfaps are already off, this was just the only picture to date that is a direct side view
the pic in the first post shows exactly how the truck looks now.

Im def putting a full bellypan under the truck, I took a while today to get under the truck and search for locations to pin it up and have found some good areas, just a few that I may need some fabrication.
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2010, 10:32 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 20

White Lightning - '98 Ford Ranger XLT Off Road
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I assume you must have the 3.0 Vulcan for that mileage?
If so you might want to look into a set of under-drive pulleys.
Be cautious of any electric fan controllers for the Ranger, they tend to burst into flames.
I believe you might have an aluminum good so that is a plus, certain year rangers also have an aluminum drive-shaft.
Those "over-sized" tires are probably helping your highway mileage with taller gearing.

What is your rear end gearing, 3.73?

__________________
1998 Ford Ranger 4.0L 4x4
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Finally broke 30 MPG in the truck! bennelson EcoModding Central 11 01-13-2015 01:44 AM
Project: Rebuilding an '01 Honda Insight as a nonhybrid Fabio Hybrids 158 01-12-2013 12:59 PM
How to get instant fuel consumption from Megasquirt TELVM Instrumentation 11 08-29-2011 03:47 PM
Shattered 30 mpg... In the Buick!!! Will Success Stories 14 03-23-2009 10:54 PM
Flying car: 30 mpg (US) on the highway, or 23 mpg (US) flying @ 100 knots MetroMPG The Lounge 5 03-20-2009 12:48 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com