Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-22-2009, 10:44 PM   #61 (permalink)
In Lean Burn Mode
 
pgfpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,535

MisFit Talon - '91 Eagle Talon TSi
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 59.09 mpg (US)

Warlock - '71 Chevy Camaro

Fe Eclipse - '97 Mitsubishi Eclipse GS
Thanks: 1,291
Thanked 590 Times in 380 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...no ABA tests.

...looked more like five each "flying-mile" runs through a 1-mile distance at 65 mph, with speed run-ups prior to the measured mile.

...in fact, it wasn't clear whether they reversed the run directions to cancel wind / terrain incline, etc. or not, because it seemed to appear they were making "backyard" loops over paved closed roadway (flying through road crossings is why).
WOW!!!!

That surprises me. They're usually much better then that!!!

It looks like its on tonight on Discovery at 9:00pm so I going to have to watch it.

__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-22-2009, 11:18 PM   #62 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadisonMPG View Post
I think we should write in.
Yes, they have a forum for that sort of discussion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:45 AM   #63 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: us
Posts: 21

LegacyGT - '01 Subaru Legacy GT
90 day: 33.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 3 Posts
they really screwed the test by picking a tauras with a rear spoiler.

the clay models spoiler is shaped (regardless of surface) a million times better than stock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 12:56 AM   #64 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomber991 View Post
They clayed the whole car smooth, which added some weight, but then they did 5 runs and averaged them. Then they made the dimples and even put the little caps they carved out into the car so that the weight was the same as before, and then did 5 more runs and averaged them. The way they measured the fuel is probably more accurate than using a scangauge.

"26 and change" mpg for the smooth car
29.65mpg for the dimpled car

Now where's the 11% improvement? 29.65/26=1.14 That would mean it was 26.7mpg when smooth wouldn't it?
The problem is that it wasn't really accurate at all. At 65 MPH, Adam had like .1 seconds to react and flip that switch, both times. Human error is accountable here, as well. Also, there are far too many potential variations to count a 1 mile stretch as valid.

There is no way their "test" was more accurate than using a tuned scan gauge. Unfortunately, it's what I've come to expect from them.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 01:16 AM   #65 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 92

Taurus - '99 Ford Taurus SE
90 day: 17.89 mpg (US)

Windstar1 - '97 Ford Windstar Cargo
90 day: 16.99 mpg (US)

Vulcan - '97 Kawasaki Vulcan 750
90 day: 45.96 mpg (US)

Suzuki - '09 Suzuki SX4 Technology AWD
90 day: 24.62 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
if anyone wants to watch it its at
zSHARE - mythbusters.s07e14.hdtv.xvid-lmao.flv



edit: anyone wanna fabricate some dimpled body parts and test it out?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 02:14 AM   #66 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,745

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,324
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
The problem is that it wasn't really accurate at all. At 65 MPH, Adam had like .1 seconds to react and flip that switch, both times. Human error is accountable here, as well.
All the more reason for using a longer test track.
I wonder how long it took them to spray that clay on, etc. What I'm getting at is that in normal testing, the time interval between runs should be as short as possible, and the whole test should take the least amount of time. If the 'A' run was in the morning, then a coffee break, then they put the clay on, fooled around, waited for it to dry, lunch break, finally 'B' in the late afternoon... Well, that's not the kind of testing I would do. If there was another 'A' run later, then it'd be easier to see time-of-day effects. But getting that clay off would be at least another 1-2 hours. A-B-A-B would be ideal, but not possible in this set up.

As for dimples, they should have saved that for another episode and tested different sizes and spacing.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 07:52 AM   #67 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JasonG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728

05 DMax - '05 Chevrolet 2500HD
90 day: 18.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
Its amazing how some poo-poo anything new, regardless of the outcome.
yes I agree they needed to do longer runs to be conclusive, but they did due diligence in the time they had.
Note the clay was on the car for both runs, no weight changes.

This forum is about doing something, taping something on and testing it. Lets stop armchair-quarterbacking "FAIL" when we don't like the call.
__________________



I can't understand why my MPG's are so low..........
21,000lb, 41' Toy Haulers are rough on FE!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 08:25 AM   #68 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
If you want to know if it's working, stick it in a wind tunnel with a scale. Else there's just too many variable to conclude anything.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 09:22 AM   #69 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Winfield1990, you mad brah?

Test has too many things wrong with it to be accurate, end of discussion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 11:36 AM   #70 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Well, I watched the second run of it the same night that I posted. Other than by admission, I'm not sure how you could tell someone hadn't watched it anyway, so I'm going to dismiss your post as conjecture.

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com