Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Motorcycles / Scooters
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-01-2012, 12:07 PM   #21 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 189
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
I wonder if anyone will see any significant power gains with the kit. If so, I'd consider getting a newer Ninja and putting the older (more powerful) engine in it. I always thought that bike was like 10hp shy of being fantastic.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-01-2012, 12:11 PM   #22 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
narrow band is just fine if you are looking for mileage.

narrow band, and a feedback loop of some kind allows the engine to find its happy spot.

At WOT, or even heavy loads, you can tune by just adding fuel from stoich until it runs with the most power. again, not really hard to do.

I would not buy fuel injection in hopes of more power - my experience is carbs usually make as much power as most bolt on fuel injection systems.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 12:23 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: WI
Posts: 473
Thanks: 157
Thanked 77 Times in 55 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDarwin View Post
I wonder if anyone will see any significant power gains with the kit. If so, I'd consider getting a newer Ninja and putting the older (more powerful) engine in it. I always thought that bike was like 10hp shy of being fantastic.
I don't think you'd see any gains that large. The Euro-spec EX250 is FI, not sure if it makes any more power than the carb version but it would be interesting to see.

As far as the newer engines being down on power, it would be a lot easier to do a cam swap + pipe to get whatever is available. Pretty sure it's the cam that changed the output, as I believe they were trying to bump the midrange up from the previous version. Carb size stayed the same pretty sure.

One advantage I can see from these FI conversions (for the person interested in mileage) would be dropping down in venturi size. You'd be giving-up some power of course, but I would think you could pick up some MPGs if you were tuned for your cruising RPMs and not top-end power. The Ninja engine makes peak torque and HP way up there, and everything (cams, carbs, etc) supports that end of the spectrum. Anything you could do to drop the torque peak down closer to cruising RPM would help. Seeing as how biased the engine is toward power at high RPMs I'm really amazed they get the mileage they do when cruising, especially if they are geared up.


Jay
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 12:35 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDarwin View Post
I wonder if anyone will see any significant power gains with the kit. If so, I'd consider getting a newer Ninja and putting the older (more powerful) engine in it. I always thought that bike was like 10hp shy of being fantastic.
Off the shelf pipe/ jet kits can get the Ninja 250 to 30hp. 26hp of the stock engine can already take it to 7 seconds 0-60mph and 14s for the quarter mile. Plenty fast unless you just want to do wheelies. The peak power of the new gen and old gen are almost the same. The new gen cams are supposed to offer a better midrange but the power is still very much toward the top compared to my CBR250R. The nice thing about FI would be to get consistent performance regardless of weather and altitude when traveling and improve the fuel economy while doing it. A jet kit on that bike takes the FE right to the low 40s mpg range.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 12:50 PM   #25 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 189
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Interesting. I had an older one... it was fun, but a few more HP and it would've been great. I averaged high 60s with it, and had fun doing so. Having the power up top doesn't bother me in the least... right now my fun car is an S2000.

I recall reading tests that the newer ones only did 15s in the 1/4 and dyno up to 5hp less. I much prefer the newer look, chassis, and geometry.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 01:02 PM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
sendler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935

Honda CBR250R FI Single - '11 Honda CBR250R
90 day: 105.14 mpg (US)

2001 Honda Insight stick - '01 Honda Insight manual
90 day: 60.68 mpg (US)

2009 Honda Fit auto - '09 Honda Fit Auto
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

PCX153 - '13 Honda PCX150
90 day: 104.48 mpg (US)

2015 Yamaha R3 - '15 Yamaha R3
90 day: 80.94 mpg (US)

Ninja650 - '19 Kawasaki Ninja 650
90 day: 72.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDarwin View Post
Interesting. I had an older one... it was fun, but a few more HP and it would've been great. I averaged high 60s with it, and had fun doing so. Having the power up top doesn't bother me in the least... right now my fun car is an S2000.

I recall reading tests that the newer ones only did 15s in the 1/4 and dyno up to 5hp less. I much prefer the newer look, chassis, and geometry.
Maybe .5 hp less
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2012, 01:54 PM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: WI
Posts: 473
Thanks: 157
Thanked 77 Times in 55 Posts
For anyone following that's curious, here's what I came up with for comparisons of new ('08 and above) and old ('07 and below) Ninja 250 engines ( Iron Ninjas!! Battle of the 250s! - Page 3 - ninjette.org) -



and comparisons between Euro FI and U.S. carbed engines, via the Service Manuals (Iron Ninjas!! Battle of the 250s! - Page 2 - ninjette.org) -

Euro:

Alésage x course 62,0 x 41,2 mm
Taux de compression 11,6:1
Distribution DOHC, 8 soupapes
Puissance maxi 33 ch (24 kW) à 11 000 tr/min
Couple maxi 2,24 kgf m (22 Nm) à 8 200 tr/min
Type d'alimentation Injection : 2 x ø 28 mm (Keihin) Double papillo


U.S

Bore And Stroke: 62.0× 41.2 mm (2.5 × 1.6 in.)
Displacement: 249 cm³ (15.2 cu in.)
Compression Ratio: 11.6
Maximum Horsepower: 23.4 kW (31.8 PS) @11 000 r/min (rpm),
Maximum Torque: 22.0 N·m (2.24 kg·m, 16.2 ft·lb) @9 500
Carburetion System: Carburetor, Keihin CVK 30× 2


So based on that info the older engine makes 1.36 more HP than the newer one and the Euro version with F. I. makes .6 more kW (.82 HP) of power than the carbed version. That's assuming many other factors are identical.


Jay
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jkv357 For This Useful Post:
ProDarwin (02-01-2012), sendler (02-01-2012)
Old 02-01-2012, 03:02 PM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 189
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
Huh, guess the peak isn't that different, however the area under the curve up top appears to be significantly different - older engine makes around 5hp more @ 13,000 rpm. Thanks for the info.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2012, 04:16 PM   #29 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Austin tx
Posts: 115

vandle - '93 Ford E-350 Xlt
Thanks: 1
Thanked 22 Times in 14 Posts
These have been out for a while now, anyone else playing with them? I am thinking of throwing one on a 1979 honda xl250s. factory they get 70-80mpg, what kind of increase do you guys think i would get by going efi?
I would have to sort out the increased load on the electrical system. Don't know if they would work with my bikes 6v system.
__________________
2007 Silverado 3500 classic duramax diesel, Allison 6 speed auto, extracab long bed. Doing head gaskets, will probably do econo tune and aero mods next.

Mad max would have driven a metro
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 04:26 PM   #30 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: France - Paris
Posts: 762

la_voiture_de_courses - '03 Renault Megane Estate
OldContinents
90 day: 44.34 mpg (US)

xiao lan - '01 Audi A2
90 day: 38.88 mpg (US)

Brit iron - '92 Mini Mini
90 day: 45.5 mpg (US)

Prius - '09 Toyota PRIUS Lounge
90 day: 47.37 mpg (US)

Beemer - '06 BMW F800 ST
90 day: 53.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 33 Times in 30 Posts
The sucessfull build thread link on the web site leads to a fellow who got his 50 scooter up from 80 mpg to 109 mpg.

In my opinion there are room for improvement in his build (O² sensor probably hurts exhaust flow & 24 mm TB is probably on the large side for a 50 4 stroke (although I red it is not much an issue when switching to injection)).

That being said, the % of improvement and fuel price in France tells me it would take 34000 kilometers (22K miles or so) to pay for itself on my 250.

Very tempted but the exhaust layout on my bike is really not helpfull in installing this setup (twin header on a single with no balance pipe)

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com