Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-06-2011, 06:49 PM   #1 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
New tires: General Grabber HTS

I bought these General Grabber HTS tires in late September to replace the Toyo A/T Open Country tires I had on my Silverado before. Exact same size tires, just the different brand. They are heavier, but marketed as low rolling resistance and rated for higher psi and the tread pattern is a highway tread.

So far, I'm not impressed. No A-B-A data, but comparing to my mileage from the same time last year, I'm averaging about 5-10% less than my old tires. I've only got a couple tanks with them so far, so I'll keep trying, but it looks like they weren't the right choice.

Anyone else with these?

__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-07-2011, 02:03 AM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
You know new tires have more r.r. than old tires and it takes about 4000 miles to "bed in".
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
darcane (12-07-2011)
Old 12-07-2011, 02:33 AM   #3 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
If you are getting the same MPG with brand new tires Vs. the old worn out tires that is a good sign.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 09:07 AM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Rick323's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Northeast Pa
Posts: 62

Black Cruze - '18 chevrolet cruze ls
90 day: 37.98 mpg (US)

The Ram - '22 ram 2500 tradesman
90 day: 12.35 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
You are going farther with your new tires, than your worn old tires.
__________________



  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 10:55 AM   #5 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
You know new tires have more r.r. than old tires and it takes about 4000 miles to "bed in".
I actually hadn't heard of that before, and didn't pay close enough attention to my mileage the last time I got new tires.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 11:11 AM   #6 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick323 View Post
You are going farther with your new tires, than your worn old tires.
Tread depth on the new tires is 12/32". Worn is at 5/32", for a difference in radius of 7/32".

Calculated diameter new: 31.6"
Calculated diameter old: 31.2"

That's a difference of a little over 1%, while that could account for some of it, it's not the only reason.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-07-2011, 02:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane View Post
I actually hadn't heard of that before, and didn't pay close enough attention to my mileage the last time I got new tires.
Tire Tech Information - Tire Rolling Resistance Part 3: Changes to Expect When Switching from Worn-Out to New Tires

The part about the 4000 is in Tire Rack Tech somewhere too.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2012, 12:46 AM   #8 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Well, now that I have a few miles on them my fuel economy seems to be getting a little better. After getting gas this morning, my Ultra-Gauge reported 23.7mpg for the highway leg of my commute (22miles on odometer).



Still not where it was, but it's improving.

__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com