Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-03-2010, 12:22 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
New Vehicles / Old vehicles

Hello again,

I seem to have a way of infuriating people on this website, but I'll try once more to make a point, this time , (hopefully) without pissing you off...

I had a Ford Ranger that I was ecomodding the heck out of, to try and get the best mileage I could...after all sorts of mods, I got no more than 10% better fuel economy than factory...the usual list...air dam, wheel covers, hypermiling, tonnaeu, etc.etc.

To cut it short, at the end of last Summer the Ranger was stolen. After all the trouble I had spent on it, not to mention all the money I had spent on it over the years.

I was mad, I was sad, and then I was finally relieved when I got my insurance check! Less than I paid, but more than I expected...oh well, life goes on.

Bought a Geo Tracker (I know, all you 'pros' are mad at me for not owning a metro!) instead...still has 4x4, down to 4 cyl from 6, manual from automatic, and lightweight from heavyweight.

Realized I don't need the truck most of the time, heck, never...I'll use a trailer, when I need a small truck, for the rest of the time, I'm carrying 7 feet less vehicle!

It's a 1991, but it's an 80's design...less B.S. inside. All that plastic crap and metal crap is weighing down the cars... I've read all the this mods, and that mods and the other mods. It all comes down to simple physics...power to weight ratio...aerodynamics helps, but no more than dropping a few hundred pounds. Half the aeromods on these lists involve making things smaller, or deleting them...(in case you didn't notice, when you make something smaller, or get rid of it altogether, it weighs less!)

So my 2010 resolution for ecomodding is try to work on your weightloss program, and the new figures for your car will be better!


Talk to ya'll soon!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-03-2010, 12:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Sorry, aero does have something to do with weight, but not the way you're insinuating.

BTW - If you really wanted to, I believe there is a diesel that bolts into your Suzuki Sidekick clone. I'll have to look it up, though.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2010, 12:41 AM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Leadville, CO
Posts: 509

Maroon Ballon - '98 Chrysler Town & Country LXI
90 day: 26.42 mpg (US)

MaEsTRO - '95 Geo Metro 5spd hatch, 3 cyl
Thanks: 47
Thanked 54 Times in 38 Posts
Aerodynamics and gravity are separate realms of physics, and neither are mutually exclusive.

If you have a point to make, I think you can do it without being combative, but some people just feel a need.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2010, 01:01 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548

Gascort RIP - '93 Ford Escort Wagon
90 day: 43.01 mpg (US)

WifesCruze - '11 Chevrolet Cruze LT
90 day: 31.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
I guarantee the aerocivic is heavier than it was in stock config., and it gets 70 mpg.

Totally depends on the driving you do. Jackrabbit low speed driving and mass makes all the difference. Higher speeds and aero becomes significant quickly.

Kudos on getting the smaller vehicle though. I'm sure it will get better mpgs than the ranger, and it rides high off the road, which I'm sure you are used to.
__________________
Gasoline, Wind, Solar, Gravity Hybrid-to-be! http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2010, 11:55 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
I for one can't see why anyone would disagree. I don't want much of the stuff that adds extra weight to newer cars - and that especially means having four seats, when I just want two, or body styles that look like over-filled muffins. A car designed the way I'd like would have lower weight as well as a smaller A.

As for the Cd part, of course doing something like the aerocivic adds weight, because it's adding all the fairings &c to the basic body. But suppose you started from scratch, and removed a lot of the now-hidden original bodywork?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 05:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
5 Gears of Fury
 
War_Wagon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230

Spunky - '90 Honda Civic CX
90 day: 35.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
BTW - If you really wanted to, I believe there is a diesel that bolts into your Suzuki Sidekick clone. I'll have to look it up, though.
These guys make a kit to install a VW diesel, maybe that's the one you are thinking of.

ACME ADAPTERS Suzuki Samurai Turbo Diesel
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 06:37 PM   #7 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by War_Wagon View Post
These guys make a kit to install a VW diesel, maybe that's the one you are thinking of.

ACME ADAPTERS Suzuki Samurai Turbo Diesel
Ok, I lied. I thought that Suzi had a bolt in engine, but I'm apparently mistaken.

However, the 1.3 that was available, I believe is the G-series engine, which makes the G10 and G10T options as well.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2010, 09:18 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
C'mon -- both weight and low drag are important. Both reduce the requirement for power, so reducing either/both will help improve efficiency. Weight may be more important for stop and go (city) driving, and aerodynamics is more important for sustained driving at higher speeds (highway).

Rolling resistance is the third leg on this stool...

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diesel- and Hybrid-Powered Vehicles Can Provide More Societal Benefits than Gas-Power SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 12 04-29-2017 08:03 AM
I want to get to the bottom of this ethanol killing my mpg Nerys General Efficiency Discussion 175 08-16-2012 08:32 AM
Recovery rate of end-of-life vehicles blueflame EcoModding Central 1 02-09-2009 09:31 AM
source of mpg ratings of older vehicles? kp3ft EcoModding Central 2 12-01-2008 11:43 PM
Tested vehicles in the garage steensn Forum News & Feedback 1 07-11-2008 03:48 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com