01-03-2010, 01:22 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 25
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
New Vehicles / Old vehicles
Hello again,
I seem to have a way of infuriating people on this website, but I'll try once more to make a point, this time , (hopefully) without pissing you off...
I had a Ford Ranger that I was ecomodding the heck out of, to try and get the best mileage I could...after all sorts of mods, I got no more than 10% better fuel economy than factory...the usual list...air dam, wheel covers, hypermiling, tonnaeu, etc.etc.
To cut it short, at the end of last Summer the Ranger was stolen. After all the trouble I had spent on it, not to mention all the money I had spent on it over the years.
I was mad, I was sad, and then I was finally relieved when I got my insurance check! Less than I paid, but more than I expected...oh well, life goes on.
Bought a Geo Tracker (I know, all you 'pros' are mad at me for not owning a metro!) instead...still has 4x4, down to 4 cyl from 6, manual from automatic, and lightweight from heavyweight.
Realized I don't need the truck most of the time, heck, never...I'll use a trailer, when I need a small truck, for the rest of the time, I'm carrying 7 feet less vehicle!
It's a 1991, but it's an 80's design...less B.S. inside. All that plastic crap and metal crap is weighing down the cars... I've read all the this mods, and that mods and the other mods. It all comes down to simple physics...power to weight ratio...aerodynamics helps, but no more than dropping a few hundred pounds. Half the aeromods on these lists involve making things smaller, or deleting them...(in case you didn't notice, when you make something smaller, or get rid of it altogether, it weighs less!)
So my 2010 resolution for ecomodding is try to work on your weightloss program, and the new figures for your car will be better!
Talk to ya'll soon!
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 01:30 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Sorry, aero does have something to do with weight, but not the way you're insinuating.
BTW - If you really wanted to, I believe there is a diesel that bolts into your Suzuki Sidekick clone. I'll have to look it up, though.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 01:41 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Leadville, CO
Posts: 509
Thanks: 47
Thanked 54 Times in 38 Posts
|
Aerodynamics and gravity are separate realms of physics, and neither are mutually exclusive.
If you have a point to make, I think you can do it without being combative, but some people just feel a need.
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 02:01 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
|
I guarantee the aerocivic is heavier than it was in stock config., and it gets 70 mpg.
Totally depends on the driving you do. Jackrabbit low speed driving and mass makes all the difference. Higher speeds and aero becomes significant quickly.
Kudos on getting the smaller vehicle though. I'm sure it will get better mpgs than the ranger, and it rides high off the road, which I'm sure you are used to.
|
|
|
01-03-2010, 12:55 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
|
I for one can't see why anyone would disagree. I don't want much of the stuff that adds extra weight to newer cars - and that especially means having four seats, when I just want two, or body styles that look like over-filled muffins. A car designed the way I'd like would have lower weight as well as a smaller A.
As for the Cd part, of course doing something like the aerocivic adds weight, because it's adding all the fairings &c to the basic body. But suppose you started from scratch, and removed a lot of the now-hidden original bodywork?
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 06:33 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
5 Gears of Fury
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Vancouver B.C., Canada
Posts: 1,230
Thanks: 175
Thanked 176 Times in 137 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
BTW - If you really wanted to, I believe there is a diesel that bolts into your Suzuki Sidekick clone. I'll have to look it up, though.
|
These guys make a kit to install a VW diesel, maybe that's the one you are thinking of.
ACME ADAPTERS Suzuki Samurai Turbo Diesel
__________________
"Don't look for one place to lose 100 pounds, look for 1600 places to lose an ounce." - Tony DeFeo
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 07:37 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by War_Wagon
|
Ok, I lied. I thought that Suzi had a bolt in engine, but I'm apparently mistaken.
However, the 1.3 that was available, I believe is the G-series engine, which makes the G10 and G10T options as well.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
01-04-2010, 10:18 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
C'mon -- both weight and low drag are important. Both reduce the requirement for power, so reducing either/both will help improve efficiency. Weight may be more important for stop and go (city) driving, and aerodynamics is more important for sustained driving at higher speeds (highway).
Rolling resistance is the third leg on this stool...
|
|
|
|