Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Introductions
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-09-2012, 06:52 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Subotica
Posts: 14
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Newbie

Hi,
I'm Emil from serbia, i have a renault megane 1.6, it wasn't really throaty in the first place but I red a lot about mods on autospeed (what led me here at the end) so i started a few simple ones..

I changed the intake system from the throttle body because the engine was designed as 1.4 originally then renault just stroked it when they needed a 1.6..
So the filter size and ducting was simply small. I sourced some bigger diameter rubber tubing from various gm models and a filter+box from an old mazda 2.0 diesel. The engine has a map sensor so the ecu was not aware of more air coming in.. I changed the resistance at the air intake temp sensor and the map sensor so I have now more advanced ignition and more or less corect fueling..
Before when travelling on a regional road near my home town the comp was showing 6.0-6.1 l/100km at 100km/h. The filter change in it self did not do much but enabled me to get away with more advance so now i got 5.5-5.6l/100km repeatedly on the same road with the same speed.

I added a partial block to the grille and made a belly pan and some small flaps in front of the front tires. But i also fitted bigger diameter tires there wich isn't good for econ.So i guess these cancelled each other.. We use the car mostly on open roads traveling at speed and since the Megane is so nose heavy( as all FWD cars) emergency stopping on the old skinny tires took forever with the ABS working hard..

As I said the car is mostly for cruising so I did not want to delete the aircon,
when at constant speed it "eats" 0.1-0.2l/100km, and my wife wouldnt accept that little gain for the sweating.. I realized that the real issue was when I have to accelerate, it chains the engine down, and this is accentuated by the ECU so owertaking performance or climbing hills and consuption was simply poor.. I wanted to cheat the ECU thinking the AC was off so atleast it would give better fuel maps and advance.. But the AC operation is part of the ECU.. No luck.. then i got the idea. I used a pressure switch from an old toyota to operate a relay wich turns the AC off every time the vacuum in the manifold falls..

The simplest mod I made was a spring loading my throtle pedal.. I realized that on our bumpy roads i can't hold it steady and watching the consuption I saw the ECU correcting for my every move..

Anyways great site and happy to read all the nice stuff..

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-09-2012, 08:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
Welcome to the site.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2012, 09:14 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
scivicblu83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: georgia
Posts: 114

experimental - '90 honda crx hf
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 67.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 10
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
welcome, good to have you! we want pictures! sounds like you have some extensive mods going.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2012, 09:20 AM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,959 Times in 3,603 Posts
Welcome to the forum. I'm curious how you found us from Autospeed. That's a good site too.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2012, 09:48 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Subotica
Posts: 14
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks!
IŽll post some pictures when the wife brings the car back..
I was reading blog articles on autospeed where it was mentioned..
Its kind of a hobby as with most of Us I think.. I joust coure my nervs this way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2012, 01:03 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Welcome to ecomodder.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Megdriver024 View Post
But i also fitted bigger diameter tires there wich isn't good for econ.
We have seen varying results from bigger tyres - some get better fuel economy, other get worse FE.

Did you correct for the bigger diameter of the tyres ?
You'd do more km than what the car shows
(the car only counts shaft revolutions, not actual distance).


Quote:
IŽll post some pictures when the wife brings the car back.
You'll need a few more posts to post pictures or links though
(anti-spam measure)
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2012, 01:57 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Subotica
Posts: 14
Thanks: 2
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
Welcome to ecomodder.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Megdriver024 View Post
But i also fitted bigger diameter tires there wich isn't good for econ.
We have seen varying results from bigger tyres - some get better fuel economy, other get worse FE.

Did you correct for the bigger diameter of the tyres ?
You'd do more km than what the car shows
(the car only counts shaft revolutions, not actual distance).
Oh Im sorry the diameter is a bit smaller, these are wider..
Actual size before 185/60 15 front now 195/55 15 at the back I left 185/60 15.
The new front ones are more grippy and give a much more stabile feel to what was quit an anstable platform.
Quote:
You'll need a few more posts to post pictures or links though
(anti-spam measure)
Ok im new to forums so every advice is welcome..

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com