Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2008, 06:06 PM   #11 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
From small minds come no innovations.

CarloSW2

__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-15-2008, 06:47 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina SK Canada
Posts: 407

Red Jeep Patriot - '07 Jeep Patriot
90 day: 25.14 mpg (US)

Beige Ford Ranger - '95 Ford Ranger XLE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
I'm driving a tiny GM car (okay, so Suzuki did most of the drivetrain engineering), and I'm happy with it.
Wow, I always thought that our cars were 100% Suzuki designed and engineered, and then GM sold them to North Americans under their brand. Isn't it the same with the Daewoo (whoops, I mean Chevrolet) Aveo as well?

My personal favorite GM small car is the Pontiac Fiero (the smallest Pontiac in 1984). I mean the car weighed 2,500 pounds, had a massive 2.5L engine that was just as sophisticated as a boat anchor, mated to a 3 speed automatic, had a drag coefficient of 0.37-41 (depending on whether the pop-up lights were in use), and yet the car STILL managed 27-38 MPG(US)! Plus they sold over 180,000 of them the first year

Come on, don't tell me that they can't sell small cars with good FE. Today they could make the same car weigh 2,000 pounds, have a 1.0L engine (maybe even a plug-in hybrid), and a Cd of 0.25.

Last edited by Peakster; 01-15-2008 at 07:02 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 06:50 PM   #13 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peakster View Post
Wow, I always thought that our cars were 100% Suzuki designed and engineered, and then GM sold them to North Americans under their brand. Isn't it the same with the Daewoo (whoops, I mean Chevrolet) Aveo as well?
I was under the same impression.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 07:06 PM   #14 (permalink)
Nomadic Chicken
 
WaxyChicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 350
Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ironic... GM produced the drive to large vehicles by selling them and advertising them to people who didn't want them (around the same time as the EV1). now they say they don't know how to do the same thing with small cars? The industry needs an enema.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 07:25 PM   #15 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peakster View Post
Wow, I always thought that our cars were 100% Suzuki designed and engineered
The '95 and up design that you and I have was built at CAMI in Ontario and only sold in North America, if I'm not mistaken. I don't know how much design input GM had in the CAMI deal.

Wait... Yes I do:

Quote:
GM Warren (the same folks who did the Prizm) established the hardpoints and styled the car; Suzuki did the design and engineering. - source
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2008, 08:38 PM   #16 (permalink)
Giant Moving Eco-Wall
 
DifferentPointofView's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: The Dale, IL (or A-Dale)
Posts: 1,120

The Jeep! - '95 Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ Laredo
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

The Caliber - '07 Dodge Caliber R/T
90 day: 30.6 mpg (US)

The 'Scort - '98 Ford Escort LX
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Well, I kinda do think that it does make sense. I mean, in America, small cars Vs. SUV's, which ones STILL sell the most % of the automotive pie chart than the other? For some strange reason people in the US still want to buy the biggest SUV they can find, despite the consistently raising gas prices. Some of you have halfway said that if we have an SUV it's all hog wash bull crap when people try and make hybrid SUV's because all they are trying to do is make it seem like they are "trying" to do something with fuel economy, and if they really want to do something about it, make more small vehicles that actually produce good mileage at over 40mpg. That is what we want riiight?

Well, despite that or not, people are still gonna buy honking SUV's, and we can't MAKE them buy a small car if they don't want to. It's their money, and they can do whatever the hell they want with it. SOOO if we can't get them to buy a small fuel efficient car, Make them buy a Honking SUV that gets 25+ MPG highway. Sure, it's not 40+, but if they were getting 15mpg highway before, why in my book that saves LOTS more gallons of gas than a few buying 40+mpg vehicles. The Technology is already out there. The Chevy Suburban has an optional V8 that shuts off half it's cylinders while it's Idling and on the highway. That alone can save you $$$ if your constantly sitting at stoplights.

Can we get people to buy a small efficient car? yes. But it will take gas to become $$$$$ insead of $$ to persuade people. We've already done that in europe. but right now, people aren't convinced just yet that those big comfy SUV's are out of their reach.

In my oppinion, I think that the US should Use a little propoganda and say gas will shoot to $13.45 by april 08, that will get people trading in their huge SUV's for small efficient cars, but not the "it scares the BLEEP out of me" $4
__________________


Yea.. I drive a Jeep and I'm on a fuel economy site, but you just wouldn't understand... "It's a Jeep thing!" *Jeep Wave*

Did I Use Too Many Abbreviations? Here's The Abbreviations List
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 01:27 AM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Peakster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Regina SK Canada
Posts: 407

Red Jeep Patriot - '07 Jeep Patriot
90 day: 25.14 mpg (US)

Beige Ford Ranger - '95 Ford Ranger XLE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
The '95 and up design that you and I have was built at CAMI in Ontario and only sold in North America, if I'm not mistaken.
Oh neat. That would totally explain why I saw TONS of pre-1995 suzuki-clones in Jamaica this holiday season, but not a single one with the post-1995 styling.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 01:31 AM   #18 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
But they still sold them in japan, right? I wonder if the design was different? I know they're still selling them, but it's not like there's much to compare the design to.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 09:12 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Victoria , Australia.
Posts: 499
Thanks: 20
Thanked 46 Times in 33 Posts
Sorry but if that is the limited level of thinking by the people running the company GM deserves to lose their market position.

This is exactly the same moronic arrogance that gave the British motorcycle industry away to the Japanese in the sixties and the the small car market to the Europeans and Japanese in the seventies.

By the way I drive a GM product (or the local division of GM) and have done for may years but blinkered thinking is blinkered thinking and will not go unpunished.

Cheers , Pete.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2008, 09:30 PM   #20 (permalink)
Lurking footless halls
 
Silveredwings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: northeast
Posts: 249

Dark Horse - '16 Ford Mustang GT convertible Premium

Gutless Beauty - '19 Toyota Corolla SE
Thanks: 3
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
They wouldn't say that if they wanted small cars to work in the US. It's all about the perception of perception... and how they can manipulate what they can.

__________________
Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. - Clarke's Third Law
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Article: Want cars to eat less? Put 'em on a diet MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 34 07-14-2013 01:38 AM
Article: Mazda demonstrates that small lightweight cars be safe too MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 2 12-19-2007 09:40 PM
GM's idiocy shown in small car "greenwashing" bait & switch MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 8 12-10-2007 02:01 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com