Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-30-2011, 05:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Newton is costing me MPG - The hills thread

Like most here I'm keen to tune my technique given my environment and routes - but hills are killing me. There is one climb of about a mile on my "to" work route which costs me 3-6 MPG (my trip is only 20 miles or so) as it is quite steep. So I would like some advice on the best method to handle it...

- take a run at them and bleed off speed
- P&G, even with reduced G
- steady throttle and ignore the beeps
- DWL and ignore the increasing beeps
- get em over with asap.
- something else

And maybe include advice based on vehicle size, engine type, turbo or not, even driver weight maybe.

If I can crack this then 80 MPG is mine.

Mine I tell you, all mine....

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-30-2011, 05:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
What does the LOD read on your SG while climbing this hill at the speed limit?

The absolute best way to do it is to still P&G even with the real short glides. I'd recommend just leaving the engine on since they'll be so short. However, if your LOD is high enough I'd just stick to the speed limit and climb up em.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2011, 07:33 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: scotland
Posts: 1,434

The Mistress - '88 Bmw 320i Touring SE
Team m8
Last 3: 27.17 mpg (US)

Germany Beadle - '91 Mercedes 300td (estate, N/A)
90 day: 24.63 mpg (US)

The Bloodylingo - '05 Citroen Berlingo Multispace Desire
90 day: 39.77 mpg (US)

Shanner Scaab - '03 Saab 9-5 estate Vector
90 day: 26.19 mpg (US)

Clio 182 - '05 Renault Clio RS 182 182
90 day: 31.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 90
Thanked 95 Times in 79 Posts
funny you should mention this..

was thinking to myself today on the way home about that ******* of a hill between harthill and junction 5 on the m8..

seems to me best option is to climb it at a constant load (60mph, 30mpg indicated on econometer) as having a speed of 60 at the top lets me glide nearly a mile down the other side..

short ones i just try and time the end of a pulse to be at the peak
__________________
My Blog on cars- Fu'Gutty Cars
http://fuguttycars.wordpress.com/

US MPG for my Renault Clio 182


---------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 05:35 AM   #4 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
What does the LOD read on your SG while climbing this hill at the speed limit?

The absolute best way to do it is to still P&G even with the real short glides. I'd recommend just leaving the engine on since they'll be so short. However, if your LOD is high enough I'd just stick to the speed limit and climb up em.
At roughly 65 MPH (limit is 70 but traffic got in the way) -
5th (~3000 rpm) LOD says 43 at WOT
4th (~3700 rpm) LOD says 60 at WOT

Didn't try 3rd due to traffic.

Held on to 4th and noticed power increase at 4500, may need to explore the positions on the rev counter beyond 11 o'clock...

I've tried P&G before but the glides are really only lasting about 1/2 the time of the pulse if that.

Glides at anything over 45 don't seem to last long even on the flat - maybe thats pushing me towards aero mods. And I promised I wouldn't before he is 1 year old at least
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 09:14 AM   #5 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
Meh, it looks like your LOD reading isn't the % of load available at that specific rpm but rather the % of load that the engine is capable of putting out. Unfortunately, this is much less useful. I'm almost positive, but the car has a MAF not a MAP sensor, right? If it had a MAP you could use the manifold pressure as a more accurate load gauge. Otherwise a vacuum gauge does the same thing.

Anyways, as I said before, even with the really short glides, P&G is still the best technique. However, if the hill is real steep at all I'm sure just puttering along at the speed limit (or whatever) is going to load the engine up enough to put it in an good area for BSFC.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 12:53 PM   #6 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
I agree with Daox. If you're not at peak BSFC efficiency, press the pedal harder until you are. Then use micro-glides to control speed.

I would use 5th. Even running 3000 rpm is a killer to mpg, and anything higher (4500! ) is even worse.

75% LOD should correspond with about 12 psi MAP if your car reads that better than LOD. Edit: I saw Daox's comment about MAF. Not sure what advice to offer there.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 01:29 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
I am still working at getting better at hills -- I try to do something I call "swooping" when there is a downhill before an uphill. New England has a fair number of these...

I find it is much better to slightly accelerate before you hit the nadir of a valley between hills, and then try to carry the speed up the hill.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 02:34 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
I have a similar situation. Mile long hill right at the end of my commute in the morning--though I get to ride down it in the afternoon. I get into fifth and carry it to 70-80% load (ultragauge). I adjust throttle to keep load near 80% as the car decelerates up hill. I shift down to 4th when it becomes necessary. I get off the throttle entirely and coast up the last part of the hill, seeking to roll, off, to the appropriate left turn speed. I'm still not satisfied.

BTW, the car is about 2000lbs dry. 5 speed manual, 4 cyl, no turbo, 87 octane gasoline. And I'm a light 144lbs.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 02:56 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Climb it at the same steady speed in 4th and 5th - but reset the OBC or the SG right when you hit the bottom of the slope. That'll show which gear is most efficient.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 03:30 PM   #10 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Meh, it looks like your LOD reading isn't the % of load available at that specific rpm but rather the % of load that the engine is capable of putting out. Unfortunately, this is much less useful. I'm almost positive, but the car has a MAF not a MAP sensor, right? If it had a MAP you could use the manifold pressure as a more accurate load gauge. Otherwise a vacuum gauge does the same thing.

Anyways, as I said before, even with the really short glides, P&G is still the best technique. However, if the hill is real steep at all I'm sure just puttering along at the speed limit (or whatever) is going to load the engine up enough to put it in an good area for BSFC.
Apologies, I have gained business in the past day or so. No idea of MAF vs MAP, I will google and ask in appropriate places.

I plan to try (traffic allowing) the steady speed approach, in 4th and 5th (although George will do it in 3rd - screaming...) and reset the SG "trip" before each one. This depends a lot on traffic as the bypass is only 2 lanes and the main McMotorway joins it just before this hill - so it can be solid in both lanes.

I'd still be interested in how others tackle gravity.

__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com