Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-21-2011, 10:54 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nimblemotors
more economical to buy a 3-year-old car and sell it after 5 years to minimize cost and repairs.
|
That was my initial plan. But I found I really like this car and it's been great on lack of repairs, so...
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic
I chose to keep mine past five years and past ten years because I love the idea of driving one car for forever, slowly rebuilding the thing, part-by-part, over time. Seems more ecological than discarding a ton of steel and plastics (even if portions of it will be reused). But it has started to cost more in maintenance these last few years. Struts, exhaust, radiator...
|
I won't be keeping it forever, but I'm at 11 years and counting.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
03-21-2011, 11:16 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Bookworm
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Kalispell
Posts: 127
Sylvio 2 - '04 Audi allroad quattro Biturbo 6-spd 90 day: 25.09 mpg (US) Atlas - '04 Audi allroad 2.7T 6MT 90 day: 25.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 29 Times in 21 Posts
|
I figure on just replacing stuff as it's needed, and not deferring maintenance. I've had worst luck with cars in the 60,000-100,000 mile range. It seems like once everything that's going to wear out has been replaced once, then you're just on a progressive replacement schedule as long as you want to keep the car. There's nothing like a good detail job and new suspension components to make the old car feel like a new one.
Doing my own work makes it practical (and having an extra car so when one's in the shop I can still get around). I'm all for the repair-rather-than-replace ethos. Local work, long-term relationships, etc. Maintenance gets short shrift in our economy, from the tax code to advertising. I'm not sure why it's $100/hr to have a professional work on my car, but that does give me motivation to try to fix it myself.
Maybe part of the problem is an "investment" mentality people sometimes apply to vehicles. For some reason it makes more sense to most people to take a $5,000 depreciation hit on a new rig than it does to spend $1,500 fixing the old one, even though both will do the same thing.
If some financial genius could come up with an installment-paid maintenance plan, it might make people more likely to maintain their vehicles longer. Seems like it might be the unpredictable nature of repair costs that make new car payments look like a better deal. The incentives are wrong, though, giving people motivation to buy after they discover a problem and cancel after a covered repair. I guess the extended warranties with a refund clause (if you don't make any claims, they refund some or all of the warranty cost) is designed to address this.
__________________
|
|
|
03-21-2011, 12:08 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
|
My 03 Malibu is doing pretty well, bought it 1 year old 12k miles, $9990, + fuel pump, 2 front wheel bearings, couple sets of front pads, and a idle control valve. Now at 230,000 miles so less than $11,500 into it (not counting oil, filters or tires) $0.05 per mile. Gas is now $0.10-11/mile. Should have bought 2 of them.
|
|
|
03-21-2011, 01:21 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjasper
If some financial genius could come up with an installment-paid maintenance plan, it might make people more likely to maintain their vehicles longer. Seems like it might be the unpredictable nature of repair costs that make new car payments look like a better deal. The incentives are wrong, though, giving people motivation to buy after they discover a problem and cancel after a covered repair. I guess the extended warranties with a refund clause (if you don't make any claims, they refund some or all of the warranty cost) is designed to address this.
|
I have one of those. It's called a budget.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
03-21-2011, 02:15 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
500 Mile Metro Traveler
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaleMelanesian
I have one of those. It's called a budget.
|
+1!
|
|
|
03-21-2011, 02:21 PM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490
Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6 90 day: 31.12 mpg (US) Red - '00 Honda Insight Prius - '05 Toyota Prius 3 - '18 Tesla Model 3 90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zonker
|
What are those people smoking? The credits Tesla sold are for NMOG (emissions), not carbon. No one in the U.S. is selling carbon credits as far as I know.
|
|
|
03-21-2011, 03:34 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
500 Mile Metro Traveler
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roosterk0031
My 03 Malibu is doing pretty well, bought it 1 year old 12k miles, $9990, + fuel pump, 2 front wheel bearings, couple sets of front pads, and a idle control valve. Now at 230,000 miles so less than $11,500 into it (not counting oil, filters or tires) $0.05 per mile. Gas is now $0.10-11/mile. Should have bought 2 of them.
|
thankfully cars are made much more reliable than they used to be.
in the 60's if your car lasted 100k you were lucky.
now 200k is the norm with many cars seeing little to no repairs in that time frame.
|
|
|
03-22-2011, 09:17 AM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Driving the TurboWeasel
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Steuben County, NY
Posts: 459
Thanks: 14
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
My rolling couch is pretty economical for me. It needed a lot of parts this year, however, it should go for several months before needing the next round of work. I got the car for next to nothing, so my expenses have been fuel/insurance/maintenance/registration. It sure is cheaper than the new car that everybody wants me to get, and that I don't want.
__________________
2012 Chevrolet Cruze Eco 6MT
|
|
|
03-22-2011, 11:51 AM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
imported Appalachian
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 70
Yoda - '97 Toyota Corolla Base 90 day: 30.51 mpg (US) She-Ra - '03 Honda Accord EX 90 day: 22.91 mpg (US) Thor - '04 Toyota 4Runner SR5 90 day: 18.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 49
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fjasper
I was planning on selling my old gas hog and getting a new Fiesta or Elantra, but when I ran the numbers, even at 4.50/gallon, it was cheaper to feed the gashog than to eat the depreciation, etc., on a new one.
So I'm modding my old car for practice, and when I get it figured out, I'll mod the gas hog and see if I can bump it up 20-30%. (I'm really hoping for 55%-30mpg, but I try not to set myself up for failure if it's not necessary. )
Crude little total-cost-of-ownership spreadsheet attached.
|
How about comparing versus a used vehicle? It seems like wishful thinking to believe that you could save enough gas to get a new car but you can get a 1997 Corolla that gets 30+ mpg for about $2000. Just a thought.
|
|
|
|