Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
05-08-2012, 03:16 PM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Building the future! :-)
Join Date: May 2008
Location: orlando
Posts: 177
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
|
If that's Toyota's idea of Aero, me thinks the market is WIDE open ;-)
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to todayican For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-08-2012, 03:34 PM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
PSmodder lurker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chino
Posts: 1,605
Thanks: 26
Thanked 908 Times in 522 Posts
|
Without tunnel results, more of a marketing term than anything.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to botsapper For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-08-2012, 04:07 PM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 38
Pc3 - '12 Toyota Prius c 3 90 day: 49.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
For that matter, most "aero" isn't.
|
|
|
05-09-2012, 05:29 PM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 38
Pc3 - '12 Toyota Prius c 3 90 day: 49.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
It's not just Toyota. All car manufacturers have winners and losers in the appearance category. My point was that most body kits are probably losers in either downforce or efficiency measurements.
|
|
|
05-10-2012, 05:48 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Easter McoModder
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West Texas, US
Posts: 363
Thanks: 212
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
|
yea, i dig this kit, but it's not all that it could be.
my opinion? this is a place to begin, but not the end all, be all.
this is more fearful than anything. they're afraid to make something that will actually deliver, because it may look strange to the general public's conventional understandings of what a car "should" look like.
also, how much does it actually improve cd and mpgs? i'm willing to bet not much at all!
the article discusses the car's other employed technologies as a means of boosting efficiency, which is cool, but c'mon.
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 10:09 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Rhome Texas
Posts: 34
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
Subscribed!
My next car will be a Hybrid Toyota probably the "C".
I've heard rumors that they were considering the Yaris for the Prius drive train but went with the "C" instead. Darn!
I'm still driving my 89 Isuzu FWD TD I Mark, but it's getting long in the tooth now.
Please to update your mileage and issues as they pop up. I am close to pulling the trigger on one. But, since I'm retired now I need to watch my budget close.
All the best.
Curtis
Last edited by Curtis in Texas; 05-15-2012 at 12:26 AM..
|
|
|
05-14-2012, 04:44 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 38
Pc3 - '12 Toyota Prius c 3 90 day: 49.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 17
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
No issues so far. 600 miles on car. Maybe a fill up end of the week. So far, I'm averaging 50.5mpg via the display. It matched my calculated mpg pretty closely when I filled up a week ago.
Hungrily waiting for sport springs.
All the best.
|
|
|
06-04-2012, 03:21 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
Old Retired R&D Dude
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woburn Mass USA
Posts: 702
Thanks: 10
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1
60mpg real world is impressive to say the least. Can somebody please take a pic of the trunk with the foam blocks and spare tire removed? I'm curious to see how much trunk space it has without the dead weight.
thanks
|
Can't really tell too much from one pic.. IMHO, there's not a lot of extra room down there..
But, if you could design a 144v pack that was the exact shape of the spare tire.?.
__________________
Cheers,
Rich
Current ride: 2014 RAV4 LE AWD (24 MPG)
Wife's Pizza Transporter
|
|
|
06-05-2012, 02:08 PM
|
#30 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: 18603, USA
Posts: 759
Thanks: 221
Thanked 60 Times in 45 Posts
|
That shouldn't be too hard to do. Use those thin foil-pack Li-Po cells, and connect them in a toroid shape with the contacts toward the center. Take positive out the top, and negative out the bottom. Ding! Winner.
|
|
|
|