View Poll Results: Are you in favor of automated traffic violation enforcement?
|
I'm for it because it slows traffic down
|
|
15 |
44.12% |
I'm for it because it generates revenue for the locality
|
|
5 |
14.71% |
I'm against it because it's a cash cow
|
|
12 |
35.29% |
I'm against it because it's unconstitutional
|
|
11 |
32.35% |
Anything government does is OK by me
|
|
0 |
0% |
03-30-2011, 08:37 AM
|
#21 (permalink)
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,750
Thanks: 1,336
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder
That's is however what it's quickly becoming.
Most EU countries allow a few kph margin, but you can expect the margins to be reduced in future as equipement gets better and more importantly, when the technical and legal requirements get rewritten to increase the accuracy of the equipment.
|
Poland is the exception, as usual The most recent update of our traffic law increased radar tolerance from 5 to 10 km/h. The reasoning was that the radar devices are not always accurate - which is BS because our police has upgraded to the same hardware used in all of Europe, where tolerance is 2-5 km/h. Plus, a radar which is not accurate will not be certified.
The politicians also argued that drivers should pay more attention to the road instead of getting distracted by glancing at the speedometer. Even bigger BS because most drivers pay attention to their cellphones, the road, and the speedo, in that order. The PSL is the maximum speed with which you are allowed to go. Aim to keep your speed 5-8kph below the PSL and the chances of you speeding by paying too much attention to the road instead of the speedometer get pretty slim.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-30-2011, 08:59 AM
|
#22 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norfolk, Va. USA
Posts: 869
Thanks: 14
Thanked 33 Times in 28 Posts
|
We have red light cameras here.
I am for them. I am also for speed cameras. I drove in Europe for 4 years and never got a camera ticket.
I got one red light ticket. That is the last one I'll get. My wife on the other hand, is funding the new school Gym.
If you run a light here, and the camera gets your picture, then that footage (they take a video of you, then select stills to send your way) is reviewed by a panel of 3 city police officers. Their decision must be unanimous. The panel changes every week. If they see that you slowed before making your turn, and the way was safe for you to proceed, then you get no ticket. If you entered the intersection on the green or yellow and traffic forced you to get caught there, no ticket. The current stat here in VB, is 40% tickets and 60% go free. If there is any disagreement between the officers, you get no ticket.
In one of the posts, it stated that and officer was watching traffic as they passed the camera. People were as much as 9 mph over who did not get a picture snapped. The one at 13 over got his taken. That tells me there is some leeway, or grace allowed. And they are targeting the ones who are most likely to cause an accident.
__________________
When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That's relativity.
Albert Einstein
|
|
|
03-30-2011, 11:37 AM
|
#23 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
|
2-5 KM/hr = 1.2 to 3.1 mph, I'd say 5 mph(8 kph) over is 99.9% safe in the states.
12 mph(19 kph) over PSL seems to be the current cut off for automated tickets. I'm sure it will be lowered in time as it should be.
Our local redlight cameras take video also, but I don't know what the review process is.
|
|
|
03-31-2011, 03:50 AM
|
#24 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
It has always been 10% + 3mph here. So at 30 you will be done @ ~36, 70 you will be done over 80.
The fundamental problem is that a police officer can spot someone driving safely at 80 vs someone driving like a loon at 60 and take the appropriate action. An automated camera cannot.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
03-31-2011, 08:49 AM
|
#25 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Red light cameras were ruled illegal in Mpls, had to be removed, and tickets refunded. IIRC one complaint was that the yellow and red light times were manipulated so as to maximize the chances of entrapping someone.
I'm in favor of camera hunting with high powered rifles or ?
|
|
|
03-31-2011, 10:04 PM
|
#26 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
|
Quote:
I'm in favor of camera hunting with high powered rifles or ?
|
>
|
|
|
04-01-2011, 12:17 AM
|
#27 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis
The fundamental problem is that a police officer can spot someone driving safely at 80 vs someone driving like a loon at 60 and take the appropriate action. An automated camera cannot.
|
I disagree with that, 95% of police-traffic interaction happen when going in opposite directions (unless yours park on the side of the road cause ours rarely do) When meeting a LEO unless you make dust or cross the centerline he has 15 seconds if he can see me for 1/4 mile to determine if I'm driving safely other than what his radar gun tells him.
Had a daily smiles on way home, cruising at 55 mph saw a LEO coming up fast behind me on desolate 2 lane. He fell in behind me at a respectful distance, I was his blocker, watching brake light come on after meeting me was intertaining. He followed me about 15 miles, met 5-6 car's but didn't pull anyone over. Wish the lady with the black Maxima would have been out today, she's usually flying.
|
|
|
04-01-2011, 03:23 PM
|
#28 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by roosterk0031
I disagree with that, 95% of police-traffic interaction happen when going in opposite directions ...
|
Agreed, but sometimes it isn't.
The end of the Edinburgh (aka Embra) bypass has a PSL of 50 - no reason for it really so most ignore it and run at 60.
Last week 3 motorcycle cops were cruising down this part and noticed the speeders, so they rode alongside and waved them to go slower - all did. Nobody stopped by the police and nobody given a ticket because nobody was unsafe.
The day before this was covered by a radar "talivan" which I assume handed out loads of automated tickets to drivers who were no more unsafe than me sitting at home eating a muffin.
I have no issue with red-light cameras in the main depending on how they are setup.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
04-01-2011, 06:47 PM
|
#29 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...intelligent machines do not equate to un-intelligent drivers.
|
|
|
|