Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2016, 07:28 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 148

VanDelay - '89 Ford Econoline E-150 XL
90 day: 15.93 mpg (US)

Old White Civic - '98 Honda Civic LX, AT
90 day: 33.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts
power steering losses reduced

Traditional hydraulic power steering systems are powered by a belt-driven hydraulic pump. My 1989 Ford Van uses a Saginaw "canned-ham" power steering pump, as do most GM cars and trucks of similar age. Fords typically used their own pump setup but put Sag's in the vans. These pump typically run 2.0-4.5 gpm and 700-2,400 psi.



Borgeson’s pressure-adjusting kit (part number 899001) includes a clamping tool, six shims, and installation instructions for lowering the bypass pressure on all GM self-contained and Type II power steering pumps.

Here's a little chart showing how it works.

These kits are used most commonly by hot rod drivers looking for more steering "feel" on the race track. I'm interested in using one for the same reason (not on the racetrack though, just tired of my numb steering feel and think reducing the over-corrections it causes waste fuel) and think maybe reducing the pump's output can reduce the hp-loss of the belt drive. At the lowest normal rates (2.0 gpm and 700 psi) the pump has an input requirement of .82 horsepower. This is well below the stock settings of my van. It's closer to 1.93 horsepower. I may not be able to tolerate the pump running at its lowest possible setting but if I could, I think 1.1hp for ~$20 is a pretty good deal and might even be directly noticeable in mpg. Thoughts?


Last edited by mwilliamshs; 01-28-2016 at 07:37 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to mwilliamshs For This Useful Post:
redneck (01-28-2016)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-28-2016, 07:51 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
redneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SC Lowcountry
Posts: 1,796

Geo XL1 - '94 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Boat tails and more mods
90 day: 72.22 mpg (US)

Big, Bad & Flat - '01 Dodge Ram 3500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 226
Thanked 1,353 Times in 711 Posts
.

Anything that reduces hp required is good.


>
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 07:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,268

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,570 Times in 2,834 Posts
The power steering system only develops those high pressures when the steering wheel is turned. When driving straight the pump is allowed to full bypass, only developing a max of 100 to 200psi.
Even then it still takes around 1 hp to turn it.

Pressure reduction will make absolutely no difference in MPG.

I am one of the few people to study the at rest state of power consumption on a Saginaw type 1 pump, here:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ing-29002.html

That lead me to this, the only way to further reduce parasitic P/S losses is to remove the pump from the system, here:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ion-32895.html
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 09:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 148

VanDelay - '89 Ford Econoline E-150 XL
90 day: 15.93 mpg (US)

Old White Civic - '98 Honda Civic LX, AT
90 day: 33.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 50 Times in 43 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
The power steering system only develops those high pressures when the steering wheel is turned. When driving straight the pump is allowed to full bypass, only developing a max of 100 to 200psi.
Even then it still takes around 1 hp to turn it...
Yeah I've read your threads. Interesting stuff with hpus and whatnot. If mpg was my only reason for considering the pump mods I wouldn't. That being said, the bypass valve is exactly what I plan to modify. By reducing the preload on the bypass valve spring, the pump will be allowed to full bypass more often, reducing its power drain just like driving straight more of the time. The flow control orifice can also be modified (my second stage of planned mods) to allow fewer gpm max flow.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com