Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-18-2011, 12:39 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
puddleglum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 421

Rondo - '07 Kia Rondo EX
Last 3: 20.47 mpg (US)

Tinkertoy2 - '00 Toyota Echo base
Team Toyota
Last 3: 46.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 39
Thanked 96 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcrews View Post
tire hop in the rain is caused by the rain not getting pushed thru the treads.....ie worn uot tires.
Despite what 'might seem' logical, a tire does not "blow up like a balloon'.
Yes, a 10psi tire is flat.
but a tire at 40 psi IS NOT bigger around than a tire at 36psi.
A tire at 40 psi is not curved or bulging in the middle.
First, it just cant happen. there are several steel belts.
second, by design, a tire's flexability is in the sidewall. not the tread.

What I trying to say is that your thought process is a little flawed.
Tires 'wear uot' by wearing against the road. by 'rubbing'. 36 or 40 will make no decernable difference in the life of the tire. BUT it will cost you mpg.

you really ought to review the vast number of posts on this topic.
First, the center wear issue
I'm not convinced you're correct on this in all situations. I thinks it is generally true for low profile tires and it should be true, but I have have had several sets of 75 series name brand tires over the years burn out the center tread, usually at only 35psi. I'm just saying not all tires are created equal.

Second, a tire is going to be effectively bigger at a higher pressure because there is less sidewall deflection, even though the overall diameter doesn't change. Personal example. Last Summer on vacation, tires were set at 43psi, my GPS recorded a 1.8% odometer error. Last trip on the highway, they were only at 38psi and GPS recorded 2% error. I know it's not a lot, but still, they had to be a little smaller with the lower pressure.

__________________



Almost all my driving is done 1-5 miles at a time.
Best short trip: 2.4 l/100 km, 3.9 km
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-18-2011, 06:41 AM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Kodak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 346

Canyon - '07 GMC Canyon 2wd regular cab
90 day: 24.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
Did a lot of time pass between the two trips? Maybe decreased tread depth can account for the difference.
__________________
EcoDriving: Turning more fuel into usable forward motion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2011, 11:42 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
What part of STEEL BELT are we ignoring...........
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 12:50 PM   #14 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Hubert Farnsworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 70

Planet Express Ship - '94 Geo Prizm LSI
90 day: 36.57 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 3 Posts
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by F8L View Post
You may need to inflate closer to 44psi which is right around max Psi for most 15" tires. I generally run 50psi on my 15s (max rating of 44psi). This has dramatically increased the rolling distance on coast downs.

Comfort is ultimately more important so go with works for you. I quickly grew accustomed to the extra harshn.
I can only assume you mean dramatically reduced rolling resitance, and leading to a longer coast down period, ie the car slows down less due to the tire being easier to push down the road. Why would you want to increase rolling resistance? This would require more energy to push the tire and therefore the car down the road.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 01:01 PM   #15 (permalink)
F8L
EcoModding Apprentice
 
F8L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 152

F8L's 2012 Prius - '12 Toyota Prius Three with Solar Roof
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 34 Times in 25 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hubert Farnsworth View Post
I can only assume you mean dramatically reduced rolling resitance, and leading to a longer coast down period, ie the car slows down less due to the tire being easier to push down the road. Why would you want to increase rolling resistance? This would require more energy to push the tire and therefore the car down the road.
I stated "rolling distance" not rolling resistance. I can totally understand the mistake because upon reading your post I thought I said rolling resistance and I came to same conclusion you did. Why the heck would you want to increase rolling resistance? Then I read my original post again and realized that is not what I said. lol

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com