08-16-2013, 11:48 AM
|
#71 (permalink)
|
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
CleanMPG's head-to-head test of Ford and Toyota's hybrids: Ford’s 47 mpg City/Highway/Combined Hybrid Ratings Ring Hollow - CleanMPG Forums
The real kicker is the steady-speed test. Real world cruise control test shows the C-Max falling short of the V and well short of the standard Prius.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PaleMelanesian For This Useful Post:
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
08-16-2013, 11:50 AM
|
#72 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Fuelly.com shows an even bigger discrepancy (and a much larger sample size).
Prius V:
C-Max:
 |
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-16-2013, 11:52 AM
|
#73 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Wonder why the EPA rating image Mechman600 posted shows 42 MPG combined, but the one Daox posted shows 43 combined...
|
|
|
|
|
08-16-2013, 11:56 AM
|
#74 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
I got mine right off the fueleconomy.gov site.
|
|
|
|
|
08-16-2013, 12:49 PM
|
#75 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
also: mods & software updates
On the same topic:
Most following this thread are probably aware Ford released a software update for the C-Max hybrid meant to help it get better "real world" mileage. Among other things, it increased the speed at which the car could drive with the ICE off.
Now we learn they've also been modding the physical car itself. 2014 versions ...
Quote:
- include a "more efficient" ratio for the final drive,
- updates to reduce aerodynamic drag from the hood seal, tire
 air deflectors, windshield-pillar moldings, and tailgate.
- Ford will also use lower-friction engine oil in 2014 C-Max Hybrids.
|
source: 2013 Ford C-Max Hybrid Owners Get Cash As Ford Lowers MPG Rating |
|
|
|
|
08-16-2013, 01:26 PM
|
#76 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 8 Posts
|
Having all of a week under my belt with a fully broken-in C-max, pre-PCM upgrade, I find it easy to get 50 mpg as long as I stay off the highway. Most of the car's early life was with a "conventional" driver and most of its recent usage on interstates, so lifetime mileage is 38.2, consistent with many reports.
The analysis of the physical system shows the vehicle is larger cross-section, heavier, with more ICE displacement, but with the next generation of batteries and presumably some degree of technology advantage over an older design. In some usage modes, it may have a FE advantage, but it won't happen very often...
I like recumpence's POV....
"So, I am driving the way this car shines best... that is precisely why I bought this car. It has the perfect amount of interior space, is quite powerful, and excels at exactly what I need from it, mainly town to town driving."
And I like the moderator replies to radioranger... it's a better place this way.
HAve fun,
Frank
|
|
|
|
|
08-16-2013, 01:50 PM
|
#77 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
I'd really like to drive one and just see what the difference is between it and a Prius.
|
|
|
|
|
