02-24-2009, 12:57 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
MPG...what?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finksburg, MD
Posts: 145
Terkle - '97 Toyota Tercel Whitehawk 90 day: 40.91 mpg (US) Bubble - '10 Toyota Yaris base 90 day: 41.88 mpg (US) Deva - '13 Chevrolet Spark LS 90 day: 39.82 mpg (US) Malibu5 - '82 Chevrolet Malibu Classic 90 day: 17.61 mpg (US) Highlander - '06 Toyota Highlander Limited 90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
rear wheel skirts...
for the people who have done them, how much of a gain is there? I'm pondering making some for my tercel...
__________________
-Greg...the exhaust freak.
-06 Highlander 3.3awd
-10 Yaris sedan
-97 Tercel, 1NZfe swapped
-96 Tercel
-82 Malibu 1UZfe swapped
-19 Fit (wifey ride)
www.pipedreamsfab.com
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-24-2009, 06:37 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
I have no fe instrumentation... only calc fe tank-to-tank... had skirts and other aeromods on too for quite a while. Couldn't detect change that could be attributed to aeromods.
Not saying it's impossible. Saying results are so small- if any- you'd have a hard time noticing it. And an even harder time proving it.
Do it if it makes you feel good, or are curious. Just don't expect any miracles.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-24-2009, 08:30 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,589 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 12:15 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
Hi,
On my xA, the front grill blocks and fog light covers added ~10-12%, and the smooth wheel covers added ~6%, and yes the rear wheel skirts are ~2 to maybe 3%.
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 08:38 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
MPG...what?
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Finksburg, MD
Posts: 145
Terkle - '97 Toyota Tercel Whitehawk 90 day: 40.91 mpg (US) Bubble - '10 Toyota Yaris base 90 day: 41.88 mpg (US) Deva - '13 Chevrolet Spark LS 90 day: 39.82 mpg (US) Malibu5 - '82 Chevrolet Malibu Classic 90 day: 17.61 mpg (US) Highlander - '06 Toyota Highlander Limited 90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
so it looks like its minor...i'll worry about doing a partial under tray first...that should make a bigger difference
i also need to smooth out the rear from the rear axle beam to the bumper
__________________
-Greg...the exhaust freak.
-06 Highlander 3.3awd
-10 Yaris sedan
-97 Tercel, 1NZfe swapped
-96 Tercel
-82 Malibu 1UZfe swapped
-19 Fit (wifey ride)
www.pipedreamsfab.com
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 07:53 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
It depends (TM)...
If the rear wheels are right at the back corner (less bodywork aft for detached flow to reattach on), I think skirts will have a bigger impact.
Also depends on the size of the vehicle's tire/wheel arch gap, the rim design (unless you've got smoothies on), wheel offset...
I agree with Frank: for a normal car, you likely won't be able to see the results over the usual tank-to-tank noise.
Also see:
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...-camry-84.html
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-25-2009, 08:09 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
|
I have skirts on my Echo and Scangauge instrumentation. I made before and after, two-way tests on a windless day. It looks to me from the scangauge data that the improvement was about 1.4%, near as I could tell. Might be worth more on a Metro, as someone above mentioned. I wouldn't be able to see that small change on a tank-to-tank basis.
Last edited by jime57; 02-25-2009 at 08:10 PM..
Reason: expansion
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to jime57 For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-25-2009, 08:27 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: seattle
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
As for the undertray it seems as though the amount of benefit is dependent upon how high your car is and how rough the underbody is. If your car sits low to the ground already then the undertray may not be that effective. However, the higher it sits and the rougher the underside then it may have more of an effect. That's what I gleaned from reading a VERY long thread on the subject. If I misinterpreted it then by all means let me (and everyone else) know.
PS When doing your aeromods try to do the ABA testing so you have before and after mod baselines for comparisons. Thanks.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daveedo For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-25-2009, 08:40 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
One good thing about the under tray vs other mods, even if it's not that great of an aero-improvement, it helps to keep your engine bay clean, which is nice for when you're working in there.
Also, a clean engine could be running more efficiently than a dirty one. The grease and grime kind of holds the heat into the engine, in the wrong places, IMO. I prefer to keep it clean. A bottle of simple green and some water will get you a long way in making the underhood area a little more tolerable to mess with.
|
|
|
02-25-2009, 10:42 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
|
Not sure I'd spray Simple Green in the engine bay. It softens some polymers. RC vehicle guys soak tires in SG to make them softer and gripper.
|
|
|
|