10-26-2009, 10:03 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
The reason I haven't been updating my fuel logs:
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 10:13 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
My take on fuel logs is they should be all or none. It ain't a contest where we win by picking out the "bad" entries.
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 10:13 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Christ -
Honda GL1000?
Flat-4 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(but the fuel tank and horn don't look OEM)
CarloSW2
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cfg83 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-26-2009, 10:17 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
My take on fuel logs is they should be all or none. It ain't a contest where we win by picking out the "bad" entries.
|
I don't pick out the "Bad" entries, but the ones where I'm loaded to capacity for any large portion of the tank aren't exactly representative of the norm. Except lately, I guess.
I could have started another fuel log to show what I"m getting while hauling crap around in my 4 cylinder 3 speed auto van... I didn't though, because the numbers hauling are still above EPA... LOL.
I will post this next fill up, though. Even though I just hauled this thing at 70MPH home for like 140 miles, after a 140 mile trip up to get it, again, at like 70 MPH. I believe I may have still gotten close to or right at 30 MPG for this tank, based on the fuel gauge. I'd at least guess it's close to my normal average, but I've been EOC as much as possible this tank.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 10:24 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
I had a Ford Aerostar, nuff said.
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 10:47 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
|
And what praytell, are ya gonna do with that? (almost afraid to ask... )
__________________
-Terry
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 10:49 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Charlotte NC / York SC
Posts: 728
Thanks: 120
Thanked 56 Times in 52 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ
I will post this next fill up, though. Even though I just hauled this thing at 70MPH home for like 140 miles, after a 140 mile trip up to get it, again, at like 70 MPH. I believe I may have still gotten close to or right at 30 MPG for this tank, based on the fuel gauge. I'd at least guess it's close to my normal average, but I've been EOC as much as possible this tank.
|
And tell us again how hauling a few hundred lbs (about 2 passengers worth) in an enclosed vehicle would have any effect on your mileage over 140 mi @ 70 MPH ????
Maybe if now you go "Well I forgot to mention it was all stop and go back roads"
Like frank lee said, you cant take the good and dump the bad. Heck I'd love to dump all my hauling tanks so would some others that use open trucks / trailers for work but we don't.
It's kind of like the thread about deflating your EPA #s to make your percentages seem bigger .........
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 10:53 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Carlos -
Of course, your Google skills are WIN!
Everything on it is stock, but it sat in a field for a year, and was repainted at least once, so the tank decals are gone, etc.
I wish it came w/ the bags and trunk, front fairing, etc. They'd have been nice pieces.
I actually am using the whole frame, 1000cc engine, transmission, and driveline for a reverse trike project I'll probably never finish. (Or even start, the way things are seemingly going lately.) Better to have the parts and never start, than to start and not be able to get the parts.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 10:57 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Frank -
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
My take on fuel logs is they should be all or none. It ain't a contest where we win by picking out the "bad" entries.
|
Yeah, I do that, even though it hurts sometimes. But thanks to you, I now add my Saturn's "oil burning" to my fuel log ( ). If I have a bad tank, I document the reason in the details section of the fuel log. Almost unlimited room for bellyaching there.
CarloSW2
|
|
|
10-26-2009, 11:00 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonG
And tell us again how hauling a few hundred lbs (about 2 passengers worth) in an enclosed vehicle would have any effect on your mileage over 140 mi @ 70 MPH ????
Maybe if now you go "Well I forgot to mention it was all stop and go back roads"
Like frank lee said, you cant take the good and dump the bad. Heck I'd love to dump all my hauling tanks so would some others that use open trucks / trailers for work but we don't.
It's kind of like the thread about deflating your EPA #s to make your percentages seem bigger .........
|
To be honest, I can do what I want with it. It's for my benefit, not yours.
Frankly, I remove the tanks that have a large amount of hauling things, because as I said before, they don't represent the average, or even the norm.
That bike weighs nearly 800 lbs in full trim. It probably weighs at least 600 the way it sits right now. You must have some fat friends.
Also, I wouldn't "go" anything with quotes.
Carlos - that's not the fuel tank, either. The tank is under the seat:
Quote:
...Fuel pump, a motorcycle first. What appeared to be a fuel tank was actually the electronics bay and radiator overflow. The real fuel tank was placed under the seat.
|
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|