Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-09-2018, 08:36 PM   #101 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,267

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
I already have the circuit installed for a 6.6kw charger.

Right now it only powers my welding machine and air compressor.

I'm making it work with my Panasonic made for nissan 12 amp 240v converted 2.8kw brick charger at home and the 3.8kw duosida charger for away charging.

So I lack sympathy for anyone who complains about 6.6kw charging.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.

Last edited by oil pan 4; 11-09-2018 at 09:14 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-09-2018, 08:43 PM   #102 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,803

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 43.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,326
Thanked 4,476 Times in 3,441 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by All Darc View Post
If cost was the only priority for EVs batteries, they would use lead acid batteris.
Weight and energy density are also important.
I'm speaking in terms of improving current EV battery technology. There isn't much need to get weight down lower than current lithium ion batteries. The main thing needing improvement then is cost.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2018, 09:12 PM   #103 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,476
Thanks: 14
Thanked 363 Times in 327 Posts
Ok, you were clear this time.

Indeed we need to confirm with Maria Helena Braga if the lower cost they speak about it's lower per cell unity, or lower per KWH.
Like I said, even if the price per each cell of a given size (like 18650 size cells) it's the same for conventional Li-ION cell, you would still have at least 3x (and up to 10x) less expensive cost per Kwh.

But I presume it's the cost per cell, since the materials are lower cost (no cobalt) and the manufacture process have no great mystery (no one I found) and can be made even from sodium.

But another doubt I have it's about energy density per weight and energy density per liter, how both measures of density compares from their new batteries, if we compare the lithium metal battery to the sodium metal battery versions they created.

Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
I'm speaking in terms of improving current EV battery technology. There isn't much need to get weight down lower than current lithium ion batteries. The main thing needing improvement then is cost.

Last edited by All Darc; 11-09-2018 at 09:25 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2018, 04:32 PM   #104 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,687
Thanks: 8,143
Thanked 8,922 Times in 7,365 Posts
Quote:
Let the imagination run and then tell me. Please, I'm curious about what each one of you would imagine for such thing.
Floating cities in the sky.

But seriously, that inverted chopper looks lethal.

Wearables, like a backpack with household current would be nice.

How much can she store in a NATO 20-liter fuel can?
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-10-2018, 06:48 PM   #105 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,476
Thanks: 14
Thanked 363 Times in 327 Posts
But somethings will never change :





I always imagined why, in The Jetsons, they lived only in sky cities. In no episode they show Earth Surface. Was the Earth surface destroyed in some nuclear war?

Drones will be interesting for passanger, if they manage to create security systems of self drive (pilot) and if the routes don't got overload.

There are many passanger drones in projects. But most suffers from severe battery density limitation.
With the new batteries maybe they create drones able to fly for 5 hours instead of just 30 minutes.











Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Floating cities in the sky.

But seriously, that inverted chopper looks lethal.

Wearables, like a backpack with household current would be nice.

How much can she store in a NATO 20-liter fuel can?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2018, 10:55 AM   #106 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,267

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
If they can make a 75 kwh plus 2011 to 2017 leaf battery for under $7,000 I would buy one.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2018, 11:23 AM   #107 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,476
Thanks: 14
Thanked 363 Times in 327 Posts
Accoding economists in this field, that's about the price it need to reach in order to make electric cars start to compete with combustion engine cars.

One question for you :

What is the average energy efficience of coal power plants on USA, up to the electric energy arrive on homes ?

I know that gasoline it's a lot more expansive in comparison to coal, in terms of move electric generators.

I konw some modern coal power plants are very efficient, but many older ones have quite lower efficience.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
If they can make a 75 kwh plus 2011 to 2017 leaf battery for under $7,000 I would buy one.

Last edited by All Darc; 11-11-2018 at 11:29 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2018, 02:28 PM   #108 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,267

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,569 Times in 2,833 Posts
Power generation where I live uses mostly coal, followed by natural gas, then wind.
The base rate is 7 cents per kwh, total consumption divided by the bill is usually around 9 to 10 cents per kwh.

The efficiency of a coal plant is usually up to 38%.
The average line loss in the united states as a whole is 10% or 11% as of 2012.

My leaf gets 3.5 to 4.7 miles per kwh. The lower limit being pulling my trailer during winter and the higher end is summer time with no trailer and mostly highway driving.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2018, 08:34 PM   #109 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Brazil
Posts: 1,476
Thanks: 14
Thanked 363 Times in 327 Posts
Converting from dollars to real (brazilian coin) you pay 26.1 cents of real per kwh.
On Brazil the price varies a lot, from 33.7 cents to 59.9 cents of real. And remamber that most of our energy here it's from hydroelectric (cheaper to produce). The high price here it's mostly government's greed.

And our cars also are more expensive than on USA. We built and export cars to some countries that are less expensive there than the exact same ones sold on Brazil.
A similar thing happens to our gasoline, we produce and export some, and the exported gasoline sold in some countries are less expensive than the gasoline sold in our territory.

So, I conclude solar energy and electric cars could be even a better advantage on Brazil than on USA. Our importation tax are high, but there are some chinese solar panels manufactures here, and workmanship for panel roof instalation it's quite lower. If some taxes get reduced for solar panels, maybe it get better chance.

Electric cars would be simpler, in theory, to manufacture than gasoline engine cars. And the anual saving, comparing to the cost of gasoline per year on Brazil, would make it even better in economic terms.
These new batteries would bring a lot of possibilities. Remote locations here, where they can't sell extra power from sollar panels to the grid, to use credits to pay energy consumed at night, would use batteries to storage.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Power generation where I live uses mostly coal, followed by natural gas, then wind.
The base rate is 7 cents per kwh, total consumption divided by the bill is usually around 9 to 10 cents per kwh.

The efficiency of a coal plant is usually up to 38%.
The average line loss in the united states as a whole is 10% or 11% as of 2012.

My leaf gets 3.5 to 4.7 miles per kwh. The lower limit being pulling my trailer during winter and the higher end is summer time with no trailer and mostly highway driving.

Last edited by All Darc; 11-11-2018 at 08:49 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2018, 03:25 PM   #110 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,687
Thanks: 8,143
Thanked 8,922 Times in 7,365 Posts
Quote:
I always imagined why, in The Jetsons, they lived only in sky cities. In no episode they show Earth Surface. Was the Earth surface destroyed in some nuclear war?
Okay, floating cities in the sky.... on Venus.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cloud_Nine_tensegrity_sphere

__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com