01-27-2010, 10:02 PM
|
#31 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlton MA, USA
Posts: 463
Thanks: 31
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
|
Huh...That is interesting.
-Adam
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 12:41 PM
|
#32 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Ireland
Posts: 734
Thanks: 26
Thanked 304 Times in 171 Posts
|
Ok probably a stupid idea but here goes. today i had a scare when the throttle stuck wide open. Not a failed controller. Could we have a large button or a keypress that immediatly commands zero throttle regardless of input?
__________________
Now, Cole, when you shift the gear and that little needle on the ammeter goes into the red and reads 2000 Amps, that's bad.
www.evbmw.com
|
|
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 12:48 PM
|
#33 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlton MA, USA
Posts: 463
Thanks: 31
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
|
The best I can think of would be a button that would send a "bat-amps-lim 1" command that would tell the controller that it cant draw more then 1 battery amp. This would slow you down really quick.
-Adam
|
|
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 01:04 PM
|
#34 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
If you keep the clutch you can press it to the floor fast - essentially separating the motor from the wheels. The over-rev protection should keep the motor from exploding and you can use the brake to stop as quickly or as slowly as you like. Once you are stopped just turn the ignition off to open the contactor.
In my opinion this would be a more natural reaction for a driver than reaching somewhere for a "kill" switch. Although, adding a switch too is probably a good idea.
|
|
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 01:17 PM
|
#35 (permalink)
|
|
AC-DC enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 282
Thanks: 123
Thanked 54 Times in 37 Posts
|
I think that a "Kill Switch" should be mandatory in any type of experimental Electric Vehicle; if it is at the controller level protecting the motor for over-rev it, would be fine.
Usually, a "Kill Switch" is installed first on line after the traction battery power source to the vehicle.
__________________
. .. .. . .... ...
Prius Absolutum Dominium . ..........KOPPER
PHEV conversion since Dec 2006.. . .... .Future EV
. . . . . . . .CALCars # 27. . . . . . . . . . ..on the works now !!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ........
|
|
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 01:39 PM
|
#36 (permalink)
|
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
Any panic button should basically disconnect the battery pack and not rely on the cpu being able to respond to commands. I.e. interrupt the contactor, but physically separating the contacts is even better. I like how Darin reused the clutch pedal for this especially (plus redundant contactors on key and pedal up).
it starts about 1:50, clutch is at 2:07
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
|
|
02-01-2010, 01:56 PM
|
#37 (permalink)
|
|
AC-DC enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 282
Thanks: 123
Thanked 54 Times in 37 Posts
|
About the "ForkenSwift" clutch safety disconnect, it's a nice concept, for clutchless vehicles, but also a big concern in case of a common mistake of pressing the clutch pedal while in motion, in this case will be an Anderson's contact burner because of arcing at disconnect, but I guess it will be on the driver's ability NOT to play around......... 
Safety measures are never to redundant in my book.
__________________
. .. .. . .......
Prius Absolutum Dominium . ..........KOPPER
PHEV conversion since Dec 2006.. . .... .Future EV
. . . . . . . .CALCars # 27. . . . . . . . . . ..on the works now !!
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ........
|
|
|
|
|
02-17-2010, 11:06 AM
|
#38 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Romania
Posts: 33
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
hy
i am using RTD Explorer on an panel pc built from an eepc
this unit has 800x480 display
RTD Explorer crashes often unless is set to full screen
can you help and set an smaller resolution
thanks
|
|
|
|
|
02-18-2010, 12:55 AM
|
#39 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Charlton MA, USA
Posts: 463
Thanks: 31
Thanked 183 Times in 94 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerpelea
hy
i am using RTD Explorer on an panel pc built from an eepc
this unit has 800x480 display
RTD Explorer crashes often unless is set to full screen
can you help and set an smaller resolution
thanks
|
Can you provide me with some more information about the system? Processor, Speed, Amount of Memory.
Also would you be able to get a screen shot of any errors that come up?
How does it crash? Does it just close, or does it hang and you have to kill the process? What OS are you using also.
-Adam |
|
|
|
|
02-18-2010, 02:59 AM
|
#40 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Romania
Posts: 33
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by adamj12b
Can you provide me with some more information about the system? Processor, Speed, Amount of Memory.
Also would you be able to get a screen shot of any errors that come up?
How does it crash? Does it just close, or does it hang and you have to kill the process? What OS are you using also.
-Adam
|
hy Adam
thare is no error
application just closes itself
if i can maximize it untill it closes it works
ASUS Eee PC - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
xp sp3 with net framework 3.5
|
|
|
|
|
