Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-28-2010, 07:53 PM   #11 (permalink)
home of the odd vehicles
 
rmay635703's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Somewhere in WI
Posts: 3,891

Silver - '10 Chevy Cobalt XFE
Thanks: 506
Thanked 867 Times in 654 Posts
I was at steady state highway travel about 58mph in 4th gear.

The readings were off the scamguage.

The motor was warm and in closed loop

Previous experience has shown that in open loop my FE on the highway is about 27mpg (don't ask how I know)

It appears that when my timing at highway speeds (again previous experience) is in the 20's my fe is the same as open loop which also has timing in the 20's

I have had experiences across the board on different vehicles where fuel economy would drop for no apparent reason and stay there while lightly feathering throttle going down a hill to maintain speed. In those cases however I could let off the gas and wait for the GPH meter to bottom at idle rates then my FE would go back up.

I have sometimes heard of this called detroit fever or a long term correction.

From what I have learned the motor tries to operate at stoich but very rarely does except on the highway at steady state and even then few motors actually operate at true stoich but usually a few degrees below, exceptions being very modern motors. Even light acceleration usually drops you out of stoich.

Also note is was quite cold, many motors go a bit excessive on timeing & A/F corrections when it is cold thus why many suffer MASSIVE FE reductions even on long trips, couple that with "winter gas" and you have a craptaskic combination.

Cheers
Ryan

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-28-2010, 10:44 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
I was at steady state highway travel about 58mph in 4th gear.

The readings were off the scamguage.

The motor was warm and in closed loop
OK, now we have some clues. But the first thing to bear in mind is an OBD-II MPG gauge is an educated guess, not a precise technical measurement. The reason is that there is no general PID for 'fuel flow' or 'injector pulse width'. Instead, there are basically two paths to a measurement.

MAF -> Guess at operating AFR -> combine with VSS -> display 'MPG'

Combine MAP, RPM, and IAT -> Guess at VE -> Guess at operating AFR -> combine with VSS -> display 'MPG'

Sometimes, the guesses are wrong, that's why you generally have to 'calibrate'. It isn't just tweaking for precision problems in the sensors, but driving style and even common routes.

Now, this could start a whole bunch of seperate arguments, so I want to reiterate, I'm not saying that the measurements are useless. They are not, they have a strong statistical correllation to actual fuel consumption. I'm just saying that when you need a 'fudge factor' you have to take the precision of individual measurements with a grain of salt.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
It appears that when my timing at highway speeds (again previous experience) is in the 20's my fe is the same as open loop which also has timing in the 20's
This is the problem with distinguishing correlation from direct cause and effect. The optimum peak pressure point in the engine is fixed by geometry, it is built into the design. You are looking at timing in DEGREES, but to understand timing, we have to think in terms of TIME.

At it's simplest, this is easy to visualize. When we are at idle, timing generally drops to near zero, this is because the piston is moving slowly. As RPM goes up, we have to pull the timing back in TIME to have the burn hit the same peak pressure point.

But there is another dimension, the burn of the mix is not a fixed interval in time. It is effected a great deal by turbulence, or swirling of the mix, AFR, and by temperature. Temperature may be the biggest factor.

The reason that there is a statistical correlation between economy and high timing numbers is that the style of driving is lower RPM's and lots of time off the throttle. When RPM is low, you have to move back in degrees, because the slower speed of travel on the piston. When you are coasting and letting off the gas a lot, things have to pull back because your effective mixes are lean and the 50% burn is slow. 'Lean' doesn't have to mean air, it can also be exhaust gas.

This is the part of the puzzle I missed initially. Under load, high numbers are bad, but you are striving to drive under low loads.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
I have had experiences across the board on different vehicles where fuel economy would drop for no apparent reason and stay there while lightly feathering throttle going down a hill to maintain speed. In those cases however I could let off the gas and wait for the GPH meter to bottom at idle rates then my FE would go back up.

I have sometimes heard of this called detroit fever or a long term correction.
We could tell for sure with a wideband in your exhaust, but it seems much more likely to me that this is simply a case where the FE reading is just plain wrong. You seem to be describing overrun conditions. In that case, the injectors are often closed and the tailpipe is full of free air. Since the MPG gauge is not looking at injectors, but the MAF or MAP side and then presuming fuel use, it is reporting poor FE when you are not using any at all.

Try setting your scan tool up to show one of the O2 sensors. They are easier to look at as a bar graph than numbers, but when it is oscillating, you are chasing stoich, when the voltage is at the higher end, you are richer than stoich, when it is pegged low, you are lean, and frequently in overrun.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
From what I have learned the motor tries to operate at stoich but very rarely does except on the highway at steady state and even then few motors actually operate at true stoich but usually a few degrees below, exceptions being very modern motors. Even light acceleration usually drops you out of stoich.
Actually, they run at stoich a lot. As much as possible. Again, you can tell by looking at the O2 sensor. The narrow band sensor detects a very narrow range around stoich. It is very accurate at finding stoich because the chemistry actually reverses as it is crossed. If the O2 sensor is oscillating, the ECU is 'chasing it', and you are there. If it is reading high, you are enrichened, usually under fairly aggressive accelleration (when you kick the ECU into "Open Loop"). When it is low, you are lean, typically in coasting and recirc situatations.

It HAS to hit stoich a lot for the CAT to function at all. Cat efficiency plummets as you move off stoich. This is because the high EGT is needed for the cat processes to occur.

Emissions is the ONLY reason engines are built to target stoich. Best Power is richer, Best Economy is leaner.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmay635703 View Post
Also note is was quite cold, many motors go a bit excessive on timeing & A/F corrections when it is cold thus why many suffer MASSIVE FE reductions even on long trips, couple that with "winter gas" and you have a craptaskic combination.
Think about this for a moment. Small airplanes LOVE cold weather. Because they are underpowered and often run full throttle. When the air is cold, it is denser. More air molecules means you can mix in more fuel, which releases more energy, which translates into faster climb rates.

But when you are in your car, you don't say 'OH BOY, It's cold, I can go *faster*!'. You generally drive at the same speeds. But what happens to the air charge at the inlet?

Just like the airplane, it is denser. So, to go the same speed, you throttle back more. The more you throttle, the more vacuum is created behind the throttle and the lower your efficiency. The cold air gives the engine more performance, but we have no use for it, so we operate the engine at lower effiency to meet our demand on it.

To better understand why, take a look at why high compression engines are more fuel efficient that low compression ones. It is the the same fuel and air, but the top of the V/P graph is taller and sharper, so we get a greater effective change.

But, that is generally not why the timing is "aggressive". Remember, burn rates are highly influenced by temp. It would be counter productive for the ECU to run at the same timing at low IATs that it does at high IATs!

As far as the 'low FE', there are two possibilities, one is that it is actually reporting the inherent loss in efficiency in throttling back more because of the higher air charge. The other is that it is just more wrong than usual about guessing at fuel consumption. Remember, it is primarily looking at the air side, not the fuel side.

Going just on timing is probably a bad idea. For example, when you shut down you car in the cold weather, cooling happened quickly. When you started up again, there was a shift in timing. But there is no reason to believe that the ECU suddenly decided to be more efficient. It is more likely that a temp change in CHT changed burn and swirl. Rather or not this resulted in better or lower true fuel efficiency is hard to say. In general, the cooler engine throttled back would be less efficient, but there are lots of exceptions.

-jjf
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 08:55 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
Jfitzpat,

Please tell us which company you work for and the products this company sell. I'd like to know and so do other members. I think it could be of interest to some people here.

More and more recent cars have slow wideband O2 sensors. Can't you get a better estimate of fuel usage by simply combining MAF and AFR. I'd think that would be pretty close to reality. With my Elantra I have set up X-Gauges for average trip MAF and Lambda. So far it's been pretty accurate. I just wish I could have an X-Gauge displaying a result based on 2 PIDs...
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 10:14 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
There's maximum brake torque timing for every operation point. Your goal is to be at that point all the time. Stock timing maps are often slightly retarded from MBT timing, so that's why we say more advance is usually better, but up to a point obviously.

On my TDI I advanced timing quite a lot since stock it was retarded (more advance means more pressure and more stress on the components), and I run higher than stock EGR rates, which slows the burn rate, and the ECU was not compensating for it.

On recent gassers with knock sensors timing is often kept at the most advance possible by the ECU, but then again I'd like to have a switched resistor on the IAT sensor for low load cruising to see if I could gain a degree or two. There are no huge gains to be had, but every bit counts.

If you just look at the ING value you can almost think of it as a vacuum gauge, or for a given operating point it can serve as a diagnosis test. Generally speaking, all else being equal, it changes proportionally to RPM, and inversely proportional to load.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 01:53 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
More and more recent cars have slow wideband O2 sensors. Can't you get a better estimate of fuel usage by simply combining MAF and AFR. I'd think that would be pretty close to reality. With my Elantra I have set up X-Gauges for average trip MAF and Lambda. So far it's been pretty accurate. I just wish I could have an X-Gauge displaying a result based on 2 PIDs...
If you are looking at a wideband, MAF, and your odometer, you should be very close to reality. But there are some inherent errors.

First, the gauge might be reporting AFR, but the sensor is actually measuring 'equivalency ratio'. That is, it is measuring how much O2 must be added or removed to reach stoich in relationship to partial pressure.

This number is inverted and reported as lambda, with 1.0 being stoich. To report 'AFR', lambda is multiplied by a fixed factor for the fuel, say 14.7 for gasoline, but that is really just an approximation, the exact ratio will vary on blend, and even fuel temp.

Eq. Ratio is actually better for engine control. You don't care about AFR, you care about combustion result. When the engine needs stoich for max EGT, you get stoich. Ideally, the ECU could run closed loop on the wideband, then when you hit .84 lambda, you'd know you are at best power.

But the way the sensors are generally measured is slow. The chamber is pumped to stoich through a PID loop. Also, for durability the sensors themselves are often slow. So, typically, the wideband is used to help the ECU make decisions, but not tightly coupled, in a stock auto.

There are a few other cases of error. For example, the sensors are typically calibrated at sea level, standard temp. But the PP of O2 changes as we deviate from this, which translates into error. Also, your AFR reading probably pegs at a value when you are super lean (injectors closed).

But, all in all, you've hit on a pretty accurate method. MAF is a great way to monitor air, and lambda gets you very close to true AFR when running pretty much everywhere but very lean (when only small amounts of fuel are involved anyway).

In general, I think that measuring IPW pulse by pulse is probably the tightest monitor only measurement, but you still have variables like injector on/off behavior.

As far as who I work for, the simple answer is I report directly to the president here:

EmiSense Technologies, LLC: Smart Sensors - Clean Emissions

But it is slightly more complicated. But I'll put an introduction in the proper area later today or tonight.

-jjf
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 01:56 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
Yup, you are right. My 0-5v stock sensor pegs at 23. That's how I make sure I hit the deceleration cutoff.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 02:07 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
On my TDI I advanced timing quite a lot since stock it was retarded (more advance means more pressure and more stress on the components), and I run higher than stock EGR rates, which slows the burn rate, and the ECU was not compensating for it.
I'm having trouble picturing that, but it isn't my area at all. I generally think of EGR only in relationship to NOx emissions. I tried searching, but appear to be search challenged. Have you posted some other threads on this?

-jjf
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2010, 03:44 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 07:42 PM   #19 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 54
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 8 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tasdrouille View Post
Yup, you are right. My 0-5v stock sensor pegs at 23. That's how I make sure I hit the deceleration cutoff.
FWIW, most sensors bottom out rich pretty easily, I typically use butane, but they can go quite a bit leaner. However, 0-5V outputs are normally limited so that they give more resolution to the analog input on the receiving end in the range that is of most use.

For example, our 0-5V wideband output is .5 lambda to 1.523 lambda, which gives a 10 bit ADC .001 lambda resolution across typical gasoline combustion ranges. But when we are outputting digitally we report readings waaaay leaner, until we reach the pump limit of the sensor, then we just report the partial pressure of O2.

Thanks for the info!

-jjf
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2010, 10:45 PM   #20 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
jfitzpat -

Quote:
Originally Posted by jfitzpat View Post
...

Actually, they run at stoich a lot. As much as possible. Again, you can tell by looking at the O2 sensor. The narrow band sensor detects a very narrow range around stoich. It is very accurate at finding stoich because the chemistry actually reverses as it is crossed. If the O2 sensor is oscillating, the ECU is 'chasing it', and you are there. If it is reading high, you are enrichened, usually under fairly aggressive accelleration (when you kick the ECU into "Open Loop"). When it is low, you are lean, typically in coasting and recirc situatations.

It HAS to hit stoich a lot for the CAT to function at all. Cat efficiency plummets as you move off stoich. This is because the high EGT is needed for the cat processes to occur.

...

-jjf
That has been my observation. Between the closed-loop parameter on the ScanGauge and watching the (narrow band) 02 sensor on my digital AFR, I see stoich almost all the time. In fact, the way I drive, I almost never see open-loop, even when I accelerate. I think the ECU "cheats lean" under steady-state conditions. When the ECU is chasing stoich, it will go rich by up to -0.2 below 14.7. On the other hand, I will sometimes see it momentarily go lean at +0.9 over 14.7 without me doing anything. There is a part of me that wonders if I trained the ECU to "drive lean" as a function of my driving habits.

CarloSW2

__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Are hybrid SUVs a good or bad thing? SVOboy Hybrids 71 05-05-2017 04:24 PM
---Backpressure in exhaust; good for city bad for highway!--- basslover911 EcoModding Central 26 11-23-2015 06:33 PM
Lugging the engine - good or bad for economy? landspeed General Efficiency Discussion 28 05-23-2014 12:03 PM
When Good Drivers Go Bad... Funny Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 12 07-30-2009 11:46 AM
The Bad with the Good Lazarus The Lounge 1 01-31-2008 01:30 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com