Scanguage says 25mpg, but manual measurement says = 35mpg
If I measure from top of tank to top of tank, plug in the cost and the distance I travel I get 35mpg for my van.
However, if I plug in my scangauge i get 25mpg max... I never see it rise to 35...
I have the wheel diameter set correctly and the same engine size (2,5 turbo...)
I disagree: the Scangauge just isn't very good at measuring fuel consumption. I have one in my Insight, which also has the factory mpg gauge. The factory one is as close to accurate as I can measure, the Scangauge reading often differs by 20 mpg or more. That's when it's calibrated, and it loses calibration very easily.
I disagree: the Scangauge just isn't very good at measuring fuel consumption. I have one in my Insight, which also has the factory mpg gauge. The factory one is as close to accurate as I can measure, the Scangauge reading often differs by 20 mpg or more. That's when it's calibrated, and it loses calibration very easily.
The Insight has weird A/F ratios (up to 1:25 or something) and the SGII was designed for 1:14.7. So it won't be accurate in less you don't drive in lean burn mode.
...my SGII, on my SIDI '09 Vibe, seems to run within ±2% fairly consistantly, and that's with the Toyota Spark-Ignition Direct Injection (SIDI), not normal MFI.
The Insight has weird A/F ratios (up to 1:25 or something) and the SGII was designed for 1:14.7.
Yeah, that's the problem (at least as I understand it): the SGII isn't actually measuring fuel consumption directly, it's inferring it from other measurements and some assumptions, like the A/F ratio. If your engine doesn't follow the assumptions it uses, the values will be wrong.