Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Instrumentation
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-26-2010, 05:04 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: uk
Posts: 26
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Scanguage says 25mpg, but manual measurement says = 35mpg

If I measure from top of tank to top of tank, plug in the cost and the distance I travel I get 35mpg for my van.

However, if I plug in my scangauge i get 25mpg max... I never see it rise to 35...
I have the wheel diameter set correctly and the same engine size (2,5 turbo...)

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-26-2010, 05:36 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
You need to calibrate your Scan Guage. Next time you fill up you can enter the amount of gallons/liters used into the SGII to calibrate it.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Angmaar For This Useful Post:
jago25_98 (11-26-2010)
Old 11-26-2010, 10:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angmaar View Post
You need to calibrate your Scan Guage. Next time you fill up you can enter the amount of gallons/liters used into the SGII to calibrate it.
yep this is what you need to do. Do it for two tanks and it should be very close.

It will never be right on but will stay within a % or 2.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 12:02 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
I disagree: the Scangauge just isn't very good at measuring fuel consumption. I have one in my Insight, which also has the factory mpg gauge. The factory one is as close to accurate as I can measure, the Scangauge reading often differs by 20 mpg or more. That's when it's calibrated, and it loses calibration very easily.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 12:32 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wisconsin, United States
Posts: 479
Thanks: 6
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
I disagree: the Scangauge just isn't very good at measuring fuel consumption. I have one in my Insight, which also has the factory mpg gauge. The factory one is as close to accurate as I can measure, the Scangauge reading often differs by 20 mpg or more. That's when it's calibrated, and it loses calibration very easily.
The Insight has weird A/F ratios (up to 1:25 or something) and the SGII was designed for 1:14.7. So it won't be accurate in less you don't drive in lean burn mode.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 01:39 PM   #6 (permalink)
A madman
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018

Pequod - '17 Subaru Outback
90 day: 22.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
Mine is consistently accurate within 1% once calibrated.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 02:50 PM   #7 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...my SGII, on my SIDI '09 Vibe, seems to run within ±2% fairly consistantly, and that's with the Toyota Spark-Ignition Direct Injection (SIDI), not normal MFI.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 03:48 PM   #8 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
jago25_98 -

I would venture to guess that the SG is not as good at turbo engines.

Here's a silly question but I have to ask it. Is the fuel set to US gallons or Imperial gallons?

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 08:22 PM   #9 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
US gallons
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2010, 08:33 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Angmaar View Post
The Insight has weird A/F ratios (up to 1:25 or something) and the SGII was designed for 1:14.7.
Yeah, that's the problem (at least as I understand it): the SGII isn't actually measuring fuel consumption directly, it's inferring it from other measurements and some assumptions, like the A/F ratio. If your engine doesn't follow the assumptions it uses, the values will be wrong.

There are other cars besides the Insight that have some variety of lean burn tech: Lean burn - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trouble w/ Scanguage... 97Cavalier Instrumentation 7 09-15-2008 12:35 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com