Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-08-2014, 07:40 PM   #81 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 50.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
^^ Two speeds, count 'em. And they aren't Go and Stop, either.

__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-08-2014, 09:22 PM   #82 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
'66 Corvair, Powerglide a/t, no Park feature provided.



Oh yeah- very nice light manual steering and brakes!
The weight balance due to the rear-engine layout makes the steering efforts lighter.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2014, 09:46 PM   #83 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Yup, and the self-energizing four wheel drums give great pedal feel yet you can lock 'em up if desired. And the wheels don't get covered in brake dust. And they work exactly the same whether the engine is on or off.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2014, 10:33 PM   #84 (permalink)
XYZ
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: nowhere
Posts: 533
Thanks: 31
Thanked 86 Times in 69 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post

The original lawsuit was for $20k, which McDonalds refused to pay. A jury later awarded Liebeck $2.86 million, and a judge reduced that amount to $640,000.

Watch Hot Coffee if you are interested in the story. Many people change their opinion once seeing the film. I did not (the lawsuit was frivolous).
$640K is still a sizable award for a frivolous lawsuit. (Actually I'd call it a lawsuit without merit, as the injury suffered by the plaintiff was due to her own carelessness.) I wonder how much the lawyers got from it?
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2014, 12:26 AM   #85 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,460

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by XYZ View Post
$640K is still a sizable award for a frivolous lawsuit. (Actually I'd call it a lawsuit without merit, as the injury suffered by the plaintiff was due to her own carelessness.) I wonder how much the lawyers got from it?
The basis for the claim was due to other unheeded complaints to McDonalds that the coffee was too hot. Liebeck received a large 3rd degree burn to her groin area (disturbing photos are available if you search). She was "only" awarded something like $18k, but the additional $2.8mil was for punitive damages ("you should have known better, let that be a lesson to all others").

She should have known the coffee was very hot if she had ever had a McDonalds coffee before, and she shouldn't have held it between her legs, especially since old woman skin is thinner and more frail than most people's skin.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2014, 01:15 PM   #86 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Of course if you want REAL engineering brilliance, you have to look at the pushbutton automatic transmissions of the late '50s - early '60s. Notably Ford's 'Teletouch' system used on the Edsel:
Quote:
The single circumstance under which a Teletouch could be put into gear with the car moving at greater than three to five miles per hour was if the neutral button was depressed first, thereby removing hydraulic pressure from the inhibitor switch, and then the reverse or park button pushed. These actions would, as a result, either shear off the parking pawl or suddenly set the rear wheels turning in the reverse direction, effectively locking them up against the road surface and possibly damaging the reverse bands in the transmission
Teletouch - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2014, 12:40 AM   #87 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
The only thing analogue to that Teletouch (which I actually knew as Telematic) is the system currently fitted to urban transit buses in my country.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com