Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-28-2011, 08:38 PM   #101 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 527 Times in 354 Posts
aerohead -

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
I won't be able to put my hands on it anytime soon,but in the past it has been reported that the EPA ignores mirrors and their frontal area in certification of new cars.
If the Cd reflected the drag of the mirrors,it would skew the CdA of the car,as the CdA would be figured on the smaller frontal area of the car sans mirrors.
It's kind of a book-keeping foible.I'll try and dredge that up.
I think it was a safety issue in the sense that they didn't want to penalize manufacturers for having big side-view mirrors. If there was a penalty there would be the temptation to make the "minimum size" mirror.

CarloSW2

__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to cfg83 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-20-2015)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-02-2011, 07:05 PM   #102 (permalink)
mostly harmless
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central AR
Posts: 77

Herman - '06 Chevrolet HHR 2LT
90 day: 28.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
While I don't imagine it'd be as big percentage-wise, the dumbo ears hanging off my '86 Silverado could be replaced with something a bit more aero. Ok, a LOT more aero.
I don't guess it'd make for a very noticeable difference in MPGs, but every drop in the bucket...
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 08:41 PM   #103 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,037
Thanks: 2,261
Thanked 759 Times in 441 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
That is a good point. It would have been helpful if they'd given more detail.
I think it would be a great idea to invite the guy over to this site to discuss some of the aero that he knows.

( If we didn't scare him off with a million and one questions .)

Perhaps Darin could send do a short interview with him.
__________________
"You don't fail until you give up. You learn, and move on." - Christ

" Hypermiling is not going slow, it's driving with more intelligence." - UFO
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 10:24 PM   #104 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 74 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto View Post
What is the lowest drag shape yet found for an outside mirror?

How about noise measurements from outside mirrors--which are quietest?
with these it could all be in the distance from the vehicle, too close and the boundary layers (from car and mirror, depending on design obviously) will interfere with each other, also the shape of the mount makes a big difference, my Jeep mirrors mounts are kinda like vertical cylinders since they fold in. If the brackets are made of oval shaped tubing, there would be less turbulence on the back side and subsequently there would be less noise. i'm in the process of designing some wedges for the leading edge of the mirror mounts to make them more streamlined with the mirrors folded back. i'll post some pics of the mounts tomorrow.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2011, 11:54 PM   #105 (permalink)
Bookworm
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Olympia
Posts: 127

Sylvio - '02 Audi allroad quattro Biturbo 6-spd
90 day: 21.08 mpg (US)

Focus - '17 Ford Focus SE
90 day: 45.64 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7
Thanked 29 Times in 21 Posts
I finally understand why the "blind spot" exists. It's in the regulation. Never thought of that. They could widen out the required field of view, and every company selling cars in the affected jurisdiction would have to come up with a solution. Some of them would probably be very clever and effective.

I think they should include the mirrors in the drag calculus, because the object of the game is awareness of objects behind and alongside the vehicle, not square inches of glass or number of pixels, or whatever someone might come up with.

Rearview cameras are already cheaper than side mirrors, probably easier to defrost, safer, more aerodynamic, compatible with thermal imaging (which is where night vision augmentation will go), lighter, and just generally more high-tech.

"More High Tech" is always good for a marketing campaign. Personally I prefer low tech unless high tech provides some actual benefit to the user other than the illusion of progress.

Sorry about the rants (there have been others), I'm a shut-in today because I'm sick, and it's driving me nuts. Fingers crossed, they'll let me out of here tomorrow.
__________________


Invalid argument techniques to watch for.
'48 C170
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 11:11 AM   #106 (permalink)
Making Ecomods a G thing
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 655

Angie - '08 Infiniti G35 X
90 day: 22.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 74 Times in 57 Posts
here are a couple pictures i found showing what the side mirrors look like on my Jeep, big bricks on the side of the giant brick.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	21W4C37Y68L__SL500_AA300_.jpg
Views:	35
Size:	7.4 KB
ID:	7881   Click image for larger version

Name:	JELIM1A.jpg
Views:	31
Size:	7.2 KB
ID:	7882  
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 07:54 PM   #107 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 10,508
Thanks: 16,287
Thanked 5,590 Times in 3,342 Posts
Probe-series?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto View Post
What is the lowest drag shape yet found for an outside mirror?

How about noise measurements from outside mirrors--which are quietest?
Somewhere along the line,I believe one of the Ford guys claimed net zero for the mirrors on one of the Probe cars.Perhaps I can re-discover that one.
As to noise,I have no idea.You will notice turbulators on some of them to move their resonant frequency out of human range.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2011, 05:28 PM   #108 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 364

ZX - '97 Citroen ZX Monaco
OldContinents
90 day: 61.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 31 Times in 25 Posts
Many of you probably remembers 70's, some Japanese cars did have mirrors shaped as a bullet back then, you can find plenty of pics if you search from Google for bullet mirror.

But is that giving benefits? Would it still require some boat tail to be even better or does that edge often seen in them release air so well that no further improvements are required?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 11:37 AM   #109 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
I should make some videos testing this. I pulled the passenger side mirror off the Aspire, but didn't notice a difference right away. Then again, the weather is always different.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 11:42 AM   #110 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 21,235

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.8 mpg (US)

Winter beater Metro - '00 Chevrolet Metro
90 day: 73.57 mpg (US)

Fancy Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 55.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,988
Thanked 5,875 Times in 3,045 Posts
You wouldn't notice the MPG impact of a single mirror removal outside of controlled-as-possible testing.

__________________
Latest mods test: 15 mods = 15% MPG improvement: A-B test, 2007 Honda Civic 1.8L, 5-speed
Ecodriving test:
Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown: Nissan Micra 1.6L



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-20-2015)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com