Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-01-2011, 12:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
Single Wire 50 Amp Ultra-Mini Alternator

Hello -

As a compromise to no alternator, this seems pretty neat :

https://www.pegasusautoracing.com/pr...asp?RecID=7040 - $280
Quote:
This super-compact 12 volt alternator is suitable for use on just about any formula car or sports racer. It weighs only 6 pounds and is small enough to fit in the most crowded engine bay. Despite its small size, it puts out up to 50 amps! That's enough power for the most demanding data acquisition, driving lights, and fuel injection systems. The single wire design is easy to hook up. 2.5" diameter V-belt pulley included. Can be driven up to 15,000 rpm.

This alternator will require some adapting and fabrication to install. It is not intended as a replacement unit for any stock vehicle.
I think you'd need a bare-bones car, no A/C now power nothing.

CarloSW2

__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-01-2011, 01:12 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
JRMichler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,013

Nameless - '06 GMC Canyon
90 day: 37.45 mpg (US)

22 Maverick - '22 Ford Maverick XL
90 day: 42.77 mpg (US)
Thanks: 188
Thanked 466 Times in 287 Posts
Any idea of the efficiency of this alternator? I'd rather have a high efficiency alternator than one a few pounds lighter.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.

22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 05:49 PM   #3 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 530 Times in 356 Posts
JRMichler -

Good point. I wish the website had a specsheet and/or a brand name, but it doesn't, .

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2011, 09:08 PM   #4 (permalink)
OCD Master EcoModder
 
brucepick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Eastern CT, USA
Posts: 1,936

Outasight - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 431
Thanked 396 Times in 264 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler View Post
Any idea of the efficiency of this alternator? I'd rather have a high efficiency alternator than one a few pounds lighter.
I agree. Now driving two hours plus daily, in the dark or near-dark, I've become very aware of the need to keep the battery charged, and aware of the load that charging places on the engine. Difficult to keep battery charged with lights on and doing EOC at the same time. More amps per drop of fuel would be a good thing.

I have a plan to run the headlights up to about 3 hours off an Optima Yellow Top battery that I'll recharge nightly from wall current. It won't run the whole car, just the lights and maybe a few other specific items. An Optima D35, D75 and D25 = 48 AH capacity; Ohm's Law says that should be enough battery. I already have the headlights running off my own relays so it will be pretty easy to keep the bulb circuit isolated from the main electrical circuit.
__________________
Coast long and prosper.
Driving '00 Honda Insight, acquired Feb 2016.


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2011, 03:31 AM   #5 (permalink)
Too many cars
 
Gasoline Fumes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York State
Posts: 1,574

CRXFi - '88 Honda CRX XFi

Insight 256 - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights

Insight 5342 (no IMA) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 66.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,330
Thanked 786 Times in 468 Posts
That's a Denso alternator. You could get a very similar Geo Metro/Suzuki Swift alternator for a lot less money. But it won't be a one-wire alternator. The made in Japan Metros/Swifts had the smaller 50 amp Denso. The cars made in Canada had larger/heavier 55 amp Mitsubishi alternators.

Metro Denso:
More Information for DENSO 2100407
__________________
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2006 Honda Insight (parts car)
1988 Honda CRXFi
1994 Geo Metro

  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 02:58 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Doni_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 26
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Red face Information need

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gasoline Fumes View Post
That's a Denso alternator. You could get a very similar Geo Metro/Suzuki Swift alternator for a lot less money. But it won't be a one-wire alternator. The made in Japan Metros/Swifts had the smaller 50 amp Denso. The cars made in Canada had larger/heavier 55 amp Mitsubishi alternators.

Metro Denso:
More Information for DENSO 2100407
Hi Everyone,

Could somebody help me giving a short explanation about the fact that with a smaller alternator the fuel consumption will improve?
The smaller (50A) the alternator, the easier to rotate its axle??

On the other hand how can I estimate the 'electric need' whether this kind of small alternator will be sufficient in case of my car?

My car is an old diesel Volvo 244 without any optional electric equipment (no AC, no power windows, no speed of light... ).

Many thanks for any kind of answers!!!!

The best consumption,
Donat
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 03:09 AM   #7 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 828
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doni_99 View Post
Hi Everyone,

Could somebody help me giving a short explanation about the fact that with a smaller alternator the fuel consumption will improve?
The smaller (50A) the alternator, the easier to rotate its axle??
Jó napot kívánok!

All alternators are fairly inefficient. However, lightly loaded alternators are more inefficient than heavily loaded alternators.

The idea behind using a smaller alternator is that a smaller alternator will be driven closer to its maximum rated output power.

If it's possible, you might try to get an ammeter and measure your car's loading. However, with a older diesel, the only significant loads I can think of would be your exterior lighting.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 05:56 AM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Doni_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hungary
Posts: 26
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago View Post
Jó napot kívánok!

All alternators are fairly inefficient. However, lightly loaded alternators are more inefficient than heavily loaded alternators.

The idea behind using a smaller alternator is that a smaller alternator will be driven closer to its maximum rated output power.

If it's possible, you might try to get an ammeter and measure your car's loading. However, with a older diesel, the only significant loads I can think of would be your exterior lighting.
Hi T Vago,

Thanks for your fast answer and for the Hungarian words!!!

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com