Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-23-2011, 01:38 AM   #1 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Skinnier, lighter rear tires?

I have been reading some old posts, going back a couple years, on smaller and skinnier rear wheels. I still have a question about smaller and skinnier (thinking about tires). If I have 15" rims and plan to run 205/65-R15s on the front, how might I lighten or make more aero the rear tires using the same 15" rims? Can I run 175/65-R14s? It is possible to fudge the 14/15 thing a little, no? The Bridgestone Ecopia EP100s are just 14lbs at that smaller size. I thought I would maybe run the 205s on the front for taller gearing and the 175s on the back for aero, rotational mass, and easier fit behind skirts. Am I nuts or just wrong?

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-23-2011, 02:57 AM   #2 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
It is possible to fudge the 14/15 thing a little, no?
Seriously? Then I'd go with "nuts".
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2011, 12:38 PM   #3 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
You can't stretch 14" tires on 15" wheels, if that's what you're thinking. You'd have to buy 14" wheels, and you'd likely never make up the wheel cost in fuel savings.

You could go with 195 or 185 width tires in the rear, 60 or 65 profile, on your 15" wheels, but I wouldn't do it. There's minimal benefit mpg-wise, from the swap. Offsetting those questionable benefits, you're changing your car's aerodynamics, giving it a nose-up stance that might lift dangerously in cross- and headwinds. The skinnier rears might adversely affect emergency maneuvers. You'd be seriously mismatched if you had to replace a front flat with one of your rears, risking transmission damage driving the car.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SentraSE-R For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (05-23-2011)
Old 05-23-2011, 12:39 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 228
Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 17 Posts
I think the handling might get really wacky, and not in a good way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2011, 04:00 PM   #5 (permalink)
Mechanical engineer
 
Vekke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kitee (Finland)
Posts: 1,248

Siitin - '98 Seat Cordoba Vario
90 day: 58.56 mpg (US)

VW Lupo 3L --> 2L - '00 VolksWagen Lupo 3L
Diesel
90 day: 104.94 mpg (US)

A8 luxury fuel sipper - '97 Audi A8 1.2 TDI 6 speed manual
90 day: 64.64 mpg (US)

Audi A4B6 Avant Niistäjä - '02 Audi A4b6 1.9tdi 96kW 3L
90 day: 54.57 mpg (US)

Tourekki - '04 VW Touareg 2.5TDI R5 6 speed manual
90 day: 32.98 mpg (US)

A2 1.4TDI - '03 Audi A2 1.4 TDI
90 day: 45.68 mpg (US)

A2 1.4 LPG - '02 Audi A2 1.4 (75hp)
90 day: 24.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 261
Thanked 814 Times in 399 Posts
I would go 185/60R15 on the rear. When you put smaller diameter tires on rear you have to adjust your stace. So you need to get lowering springs on the front.

I have 175/80R14 on the front and 175/70R14 at the rear. They are even different make. Last summer I had even 165/70R13 at the rear and had no problems with normal driving. My cars front is lowered 60mm and at the rear I have -30mm lowering springs.
__________________


https://www.linkedin.com/in/vesatiainen/

Vesa Tiainen innovation engineer and automotive enthusiast
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vekke For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (05-23-2011)
Old 05-23-2011, 04:27 PM   #6 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
Great advice guys. If I went with 185/60-R15s on the rear, I could get LRR Pirellis, get a net weight loss from my current cheapies, get the benefit of LRR, and taller gearing through 205/65s on the front. I'll have to think about it more though, because while lowering springs are in my plans, I was not anticipating that cost just now.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2011, 09:26 AM   #7 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 433 Times in 283 Posts
I believe there are a number of good LRR tires available in the OEM size 185-65-14. These include the Insight-1 RE-92's. That's where I'd go, and match front and rear for simplicity.

tirerack lists 8 LRR in this size, including the Goodyear Assurance FuelMax. I have those on my Odyssey and LOVE them.

__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com