Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-26-2014, 03:53 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: uk greece
Posts: 84

Endless money pit - '07 Toyota Yaris
Team Toyota
90 day: 40.72 mpg (US)

Red - '08 Honda Cbf600
90 day: 52.89 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
skinny tires and handling effect

hello ecomodders!!

it is time to buy new tires for my bmw E30 318i
currently the tires are 195/60r14
and Ι am thinking about 175/70R14
in order to bring revs down and decreace rolling and aerodynamic resistance.
I tend to enjoy my car on curvy roads and hypermile elsewhere in order to balance my fuel consumption.
my question is about lateral grip,how bad can it be??
and what about FE with this tire conversion???

average mpg is 33-35 mpg
mods: 40-45 psi,grill block,air dam,belt fan delete(on winter),30kg weight reduction,folded passenger mirror(except city driving)

thank you in advance!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-26-2014, 07:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: missouri
Posts: 209

Suki - '11 Suzuki SX4
Team Suzuki
90 day: 26.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 62 Times in 34 Posts
I'm not an expert, but I have looked into this, The Donkey CRX claims 1.5-2mpg, so expect 1mpg from thinness, plus maybe 1mpg for height, and expect the tires to be more likely follow any unevenness in the road, you might feel bumps more too.
__________________
"Ignorance is bliss, but only for the ignorant"-Hypermiler1995
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 08:31 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
LOOK for my posts on my 2002 Q45S with factory 245/45/18. I went to 50's. didn't notice any difference in handling.
Really depends on the stickiness of the rubber.
The 5+% increase in diameter helped my mpg, especially on the highway.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 08:48 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
Pumping up the tires extra hard just for those canyon-carving sessions can mitigate or eliminate any loss of grip due to the sidewalls rolling over. And let's be honest, coming from a 195/60, you'd already have a lot of that happening anyway, unless you're already running high pressures!

When I get a test unit with ultra-tall tires, I often find myself sticking 45-50 psi in when I want to have some "fun"... Not a substitute for better tires, but at least the handling gets more predictable. Some police instructors have suggested 60 psi... but then they're running old-school balloon tires on two-ton ladder frame sedans, so...

Any loss of grip due to the narrower section width is either marginal or non-existent, depending on who you ask, and likely the tire compound itself will have a greater effect on lateral grip.

As said, though, the tires will be more likely to follow the road. They'll affect on-center stability on the highway and might feel a bit more tippy. Pump them up hard and the wandering is exacerbated, in most cases... but I don't know if this is dependent on the cars I've had these tires on, so YMMV.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 10:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Skinny tires are like "high-heels" when it comes to cornering and handling.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2014, 11:51 PM   #6 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
i would put finding a tire model, and desired diameter above finding a narrower tire, if you can find all three, then great. I wouldn't be surprised if the best tire size for mileage on your car would be the biggest diameter that doesn't hit or rub. As an example on tire model without any considerations but mileage, I think a 185/65-14 Goodyear fuel max would beat out every available 175/70-14 here dispite being a fraction shorter and wider.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2014, 12:13 AM   #7 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
I noticed a considerable drop in cornering capabilities when I got my Re92's. But then again, my mileage went up 8-15 mpg.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2014, 12:19 AM   #8 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
Skinny tires are like "high-heels" when it comes to cornering and handling.
The old Porsches did pretty well on skinnies.

But I don't think 20mm width will be the biggest variable with any tire change.

I went from 235 to 265 and didn't notice more cornering capability- but then I wasn't looking for it either. So for ordinary driving it didn't matter but for exploring the limits it might have.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2014, 03:54 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 333
Thanks: 16
Thanked 79 Times in 54 Posts
Send a message via MSN to markweatherill
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
The old Porsches did pretty well on skinnies.
Who told you that? James Dean?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2014, 07:39 AM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by markweatherill View Post
Who told you that? James Dean?
The history books. Lemans, Targa Florio, Rally, all conquered on skinny tyres. The 550 ran 155's IRC.

People confuse 'handling' with grip. There's no reason why a car on skinny tyres can't have 'perfect' handling while one on a set of fat racing slicks is a dog. The car on slicks might still be faster, but that's because it has more grip.

__________________






  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com