Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Off-Topic Tech
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-06-2019, 11:25 PM   #181 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455

Jeep - '97 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Blueberry - '07 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamIan View Post

Strap in


I feel like there's a challenge there, ha. Accepted.

You have said that I can't overgeneralize when it comes to different kinds of vehicles. I quote from the NHTSA: "The ability to store and deliver substantial energy onboard a vehicle also implies that substantial
energy can be released, with corresponding hazards, in the case of failure. In this case, the energy
is stored electrochemically in batteries, rather than chemically as a fuel. While systems safety
engineering can achieve levels of safety with Li-ion technology comparable to that of
conventional fuels, the automotive industry does not have decades of experience with it and the
same understanding that it has concerning conventional and alternative fuels".

They have also articulated well what I have been trying to say this entire time about the overall safety of EVs: "The risks associated with Li-ion battery systems derive fundamentally from the novelty of the
technology and limited long-term experience base with its safety performance. Vehicle service is
one of the most diverse and challenging engineering applications because of the diversity of
environments, vehicle users and potential for misuse and abuse. There is limited experience in
understanding how the rigors and challenges of severe vehicle duty cycles affect the long-term
safety of Li-ion batteries and systems. Auto makers and battery manufacturers are working
diligently to ensure that the battery systems being deployed are safe for consumers, but it is an
evolving field. The same was true of natural gas and propane fuel vehicles in the 1990s and of
hydrogen fuel vehicles in the 2000s".

In essence, I am wary of the technology right now because of the inexperience we have with it. The media has spun some negativity on the technology and I see some truth to it. The ICE industry has the advantage of being around for 100 years. We have a very good idea on what causes a fire in an ICE. EVs have some unknowns still.

These are some of the things that can cause fires, or "thermal runaways": Perhaps best known of the potential failure mechanisms of Li-ion batteries is thermal runaway in
which external short circuits, internal short circuits, cell overcharging, cell over-discharging,
physical abuse such as crush, or exposure to high ambient temperatures can each potentially
cause overheating of a cell and initiate thermal runaway events, or weaken the cell such that it is
more prone to thermal runaway (Arora, Medora, Livernois, & Stewart, 2010; Brenier,
McDowall, & Morin, 2004). Once initiated, thermal runaway is self-propagating failure within a
cell, a series of cells, an array or module, or even beyond the enclosure to the vehicle. Thermal
runaway is most likely to be realized when an event occurs that results in rapid heating of the cell
that outpaces the rate of heat dissipation in the cell. Adiabatic self-heating can be caused by
thermal (e.g., radiant heating), electrical (e.g., short circuiting), or physical (e.g., compression)
external effects".
There are many failsafes in EVs to try to prevent this, but this can still happen despite preventative measures given the correct conditions.

There is a reason why batteries are supposed to be replaced after a certain timeframe, and this is it: "Battery failures that lead to sub-optimal performance and degradation can often be traced back to
aging mechanisms within the cell. The cathode and the anode age differently, and the majority of
aging in the system takes place at the interface of the separator, the electrolyte, and the cathode
or anode. Aging at either electrode can lead to a change in its properties that varies with both
calendar time and use. During storage, self-discharges and increasing impedance can shorten
shelf life. In addition, trace contaminants, such as water and iron, can have significant effects on
the degradation. The cycle life is typically influenced by stress induced degradation and lithium
metal plating".
Battery life isn't just about the battery capacity. Using old batteries is basically driving on borrowed time; the chance of thermal runaway or a short circuit is dramatically increased.

This is an explanation of what happened in the Rich video: If not prevented or mitigated, the causes and contributors to damage and failure at the cell level
can result in uncontrolled exothermic reactions and heating and pressure rise within a cell, i.e.
thermal runaway. If thermal runaway cannot be controlled or mitigated through measures such as
thermal shutdown separators, then the cell may vent, creating local overpressure and releasing
combustible solvent vapors that may ignite and burn, the primary hazards of cell failure. If
pressure relief protections are not present or fail, then cells may rupture, potentially also
releasing hot particles and projectiles. If the failures do not propagate beyond the cell, then these
primary hazards may be contained within the casing of an array or module".
As we have seen and read in the news, this is not always contained in the battery casing, such as in a vehicle crash.

So, will the EV overtake and eventually replace the ICE?
I don't think so. And many experts in the field are also skeptical that they will be overtaken and replaced. If you compare a new vehicle today to a vehicle made in the 70s, you will see a huge difference in efficiency and emissions. Who's to say the trend won't continue? One big factor for EV supporters is the cheap price of electricity. Electricity will not be so cheap if you take out the fossil fuel factor, and when you add in a huge additional load from electric powered vehicles.

As far as what you have said about stationary ICEs being replaced, I wouldn't be so certain of that. Most managers (especially American managers) suffer from managerial myopia; they choose the short term gain rather than investing for the future. New equipment is expensive. For a very long time it will be cheaper to repair existing equipment. That is why we still see 50 year old equipment in use today, when new equipment is more energy efficient and shinier.

Biofuel:
When you think of it, we are already supplementing a large portion of our fuel with biofuel.

https://www.epa.gov/environmental-ec...omics-biofuels

After doing some research (including reading a scholarly paper), my sources have not really presented any major reason why we are not using cellulosic biofuel. Would someone like to share? The major reason the paper presented is that it would compete with people who want firewood, etc. But there is a lot of waste in this country.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-07-2019, 02:59 AM   #182 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,501
Thanks: 8,061
Thanked 8,864 Times in 7,317 Posts
TLDR

Mac OS Summary Service:

Quote:
Originally Posted by IamIan
Even if you did manage to show it to be the case for every specific BEV on the road today vs every ICE on the road today .. that still would not account for the issue of #1 .. the choices made and what options they have that they could have chosen differently.


...At best that example is a case of .. .1st .. 1 step backward (making things worse) .. then (only after they are forced to) 1 step forward .. if it hadn't been for the need to force them to fix it .. it might have just been -1+1=0 no net change overall .. but .. they did have to force them .. and they arguably did the bare minimum fix .. ie . overall it is more of an example of the opposite.


...The very best most efficient photo synthesis known is only about ~8% .. compared to the very best Photovoltaic over 40% .. and co-generation photovoltaic and solar thermal combined systems have been able to get around ~80% .. then it only gets worse .. the RE-Bio has less efficient steps to then apply that harvested solar energy to get desired work out of it .. like move a car .. heat a house .. etc.


At the current state .. it would actually take at least several dozens of major improvements .. or hundreds of small ones .. and even if that were to happen tomorrow .. that's just in the lab .. they are still decades behind in deployment of those .. and that is just to get them up to where other RE like Solar/Wind are already at today .. and while Bio-Re is trying to play catch-up it isn't like the Solar/wind is just waiting for them .. they keep moving too.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor95
I don't think so. And many experts in the field are also skeptical that they will be overtaken and replaced. If you compare a new vehicle today to a vehicle made in the 70s, you will see a huge difference in efficiency and emissions. Who's to say the trend won't continue? One big factor for EV supporters is the cheap price of electricity. Electricity will not be so cheap if you take out the fossil fuel factor, and when you add in a huge additional load from electric powered vehicles.


Biofuel:


After doing some research (including reading a scholarly paper), my sources have not really presented any major reason why we are not using cellulosic biofuel. Would someone like to share? The major reason the paper presented is that it would compete with people who want firewood, etc. But there is a lot of waste in this country.

VW ODDITY STUFF - VW-VANAGON.WEEBLY.COM
__________________
.
.
Without freedom of speech we wouldn't know who all the idiots are. -- anonymous poster

____________________
.
.
Three conspiracy theorists walk into a bar --You can't say that is a coincidence.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to freebeard For This Useful Post:
Taylor95 (03-07-2019)
Old 03-07-2019, 12:02 PM   #183 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,737

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,467 Times in 3,432 Posts
Yeah, and I thought I was long winded. Seems like a lot of talk to try to convince people EVs are particularly dangerous when there's no evidence to support that.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
IamIan (03-07-2019)
Old 03-07-2019, 01:09 PM   #184 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455

Jeep - '97 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Blueberry - '07 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Yeah, and I thought I was long winded. Seems like a lot of talk to try to convince people EVs are particularly dangerous when there's no evidence to support that.
All the information I quoted is from a paper sponsored by the NHTSA. It is all scientifically supported information about the shortcomings of lithium ion batteries. They aren't perfect.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 01:32 PM   #185 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,737

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,467 Times in 3,432 Posts
Your quotes from NHTSA can be summarized as "EV manufacturers don't have the long term experience with batteries that they do with conventional fuels". That's not evidence that batteries are less safe.

You're also wrong about ICE vehicles always holding the largest market share. We're at the beginning stage of developing EVs, yet ICE vehicles have had 100 years to develop. The low hanging fruit of improving ICE vehicles has been picked. A year over year increase in EV market share has been ongoing since 2011.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to redpoint5 For This Useful Post:
IamIan (03-07-2019)
Old 03-07-2019, 01:48 PM   #186 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,265

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,568 Times in 2,832 Posts
The nissan leaf just sold 400,000 world wide.
100,000 were sold in the US as of April 2018.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oil pan 4 For This Useful Post:
Taylor95 (03-07-2019)
Old 03-07-2019, 01:59 PM   #187 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 455

Jeep - '97 Jeep Cherokee Sport
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)

Blueberry - '07 Toyota Camry SE
Thanks: 180
Thanked 101 Times in 77 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Your quotes from NHTSA can be summarized as "EV manufacturers don't have the long term experience with batteries that they do with conventional fuels". That's not evidence that batteries are less safe.

You're also wrong about ICE vehicles always holding the largest market share. We're at the beginning stage of developing EVs, yet ICE vehicles have had 100 years to develop. The low hanging fruit of improving ICE vehicles has been picked. A year over year increase in EV market share has been ongoing since 2011.
That's a summary of one of the quotes. The rest have to do with the longevity and potential of failure.

I never said they would have the largest market share. I stated that they would always be relevant.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 03:02 PM   #188 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,999

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 53.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,714
Thanked 2,246 Times in 1,455 Posts
Tesla trusts the longevity of the Model 3 batteries enough to allow them to charge at 250 kW...!
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post592954
That's at the new Supercharger V3. But the V2s get upgraded over the air to allow charging speeds up to 145 kW.

You can now charge 5 minutes for another 75 miles of range...
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RedDevil For This Useful Post:
Taylor95 (03-07-2019)
Old 03-07-2019, 06:13 PM   #189 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
People have been building electric cars for over a century. Imagine how underwhelming the originals were!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2019, 06:19 PM   #190 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,737

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD

Pacifica Hybrid - '21 Chrysler Pacifica Hybrid
90 day: 85.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,467 Times in 3,432 Posts
Yeah, but not manufacturers. They're the ones that need the experience building; not so much the tinkerers.

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com