Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-18-2009, 04:27 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
PA32R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 129

LR3 - '06 Land Rover LR3 HSE
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Smart Fortwo Cd

I've been looking into why the Smart Fortwo gets relatively poor fuel economy. This site explains that it has a Cd of 0.38 because the vehicle is made to be high enough to put drivers at the eye level of more normal cars and for some sort of increase in crash safety and thus suffers high drag at highway speeds.

However, this site, among others, gives the Cd as 0.29.

Does anyone have an explanation for the discrepancy and/or authoritative information on the true number?

Rob


Last edited by PA32R; 04-18-2009 at 04:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-18-2009, 04:38 PM   #2 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Yes, makes you wonder if they just throw any old number in there doesn't it ?

I would go with the higher figure. It is similar in shape to the Scion Xb.( which was .35 if I remember correctly )
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 04:42 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
PA32R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 129

LR3 - '06 Land Rover LR3 HSE
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
Yes, makes you wonder if they just throw any old number in there doesn't it ?

I would go with the higher figure. It is similar in shape to the Scion Xb.( which was .35 if I remember correctly )
And now I see here that it's 0.34.

You're right, they just make 'em up I guess.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 07:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
It looks more like the Toyota iQ I think, which I've heard has a .299 Cd or some such nonsense.

I will try to contact someone official at SmartUSA and get the real number.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 07:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
PA32R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 129

LR3 - '06 Land Rover LR3 HSE
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by SVOboy View Post
It looks more like the Toyota iQ I think, which I've heard has a .299 Cd or some such nonsense.

I will try to contact someone official at SmartUSA and get the real number.

Of course, Cd varies with Reynolds Number, which varies with flow velocity so...


But that would be great, I'd appreciate it. Thanks
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 07:18 PM   #6 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
I emailed my contact at Smart, if he doesn't get back to me by monday I'll give a call.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 09:01 PM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maui, Hawaii
Posts: 813
Thanks: 5
Thanked 34 Times in 26 Posts
I bet 90% of these cD numbers are made up
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 11:07 PM   #8 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
( SVO, Perhaps you might also ask why the car gets such bad FE .)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2009, 11:20 PM   #9 (permalink)
Dartmouth 2010
 
SVOboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447

Vegan Powa! - '91 Honda CRX DX
Team Honda
90 day: 66.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
Send a message via AIM to SVOboy Send a message via MSN to SVOboy Send a message via Yahoo to SVOboy
Well, they'll probably say a few things:

- compared to other cars, it's great
- euro testing standards are different
- euro emissions standards are different

But if I find someone receptive to it I might try to have a conversation about the subject.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2009, 12:36 AM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
PA32R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 129

LR3 - '06 Land Rover LR3 HSE
90 day: 21.13 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
They say "it's the highest mileage gasoline ICE vehicle in the United States." But you give up a lot (two seats, luggage area) for a little (a couple of m.p.g. at best compared to, say, a Mini). The diesel available in Canada is in a different class altogether. But still, it seems like the Smart Fortwo should do better.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LA Auto Show: Ecodriving the Smart Fortwo SVOboy EcoModder Blog Discussion 3 11-27-2008 05:03 PM
US sales forecast for Smart ForTwo revised upward MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 13 11-02-2008 06:25 AM
My introduction to hypermiling the Smart Ptero Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 12 10-28-2008 08:32 PM
Sales of New smart fortwo Hit 100,000 in First Year MetroMPG General Efficiency Discussion 7 07-07-2008 12:37 AM
Uh-oh, smart fortwo gets not-the-best crash test ratings SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 8 04-08-2008 12:36 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com