Go Back   EcoModder Forum > AltModding > Saving@Home
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-10-2008, 10:44 AM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard View Post
Hi,

Are you leaving off the "hour"? If a 1,000watt panel produces full power for 1 complete hour, then it is putting out 1kwh
thanks for catching that for me, it's corrected now.


as for fixed mounts compared to trackers, a fixed mount is simple and will never brake down unless a bolt or weld brakes, where trackers have have moving parts, and they need to have some way to know where the sun is, sensors can get pooped on by birds, blocked by snow or dirt, damaged by lightening, motors wear out, pivots are a weak point as well, with our system we figured that our output per dollar spent would be the same if we got a tracker or a few more pv, and that the pv is going to last longer then a tracker, oldest pv we have are 25 years old and still working perfectly.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-10-2008, 01:44 PM   #22 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
Ryland -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryland View Post
thanks for catching that for me, it's corrected now.


as for fixed mounts compared to trackers, a fixed mount is simple and will never brake down unless a bolt or weld brakes, where trackers have have moving parts, and they need to have some way to know where the sun is, sensors can get pooped on by birds, blocked by snow or dirt, damaged by lightening, motors wear out, pivots are a weak point as well, with our system we figured that our output per dollar spent would be the same if we got a tracker or a few more pv, and that the pv is going to last longer then a tracker, oldest pv we have are 25 years old and still working perfectly.
The Zomeworks tracker doesn't have a motor :

Introduction — Zomeworks Passive Solar Products
Quote:
UNIVERSAL TRACK RACK Passive Solar Tracker for Photovoltaic Modules
Incorporating over two decades of experience with tracker design and more than three decades of innovation of new products, Zomeworks has introduced the F-Series Track Rack Passive Solar Tracker to our line of UTR Universal Trackers. This tracker is our most popular design. It features an integral early morning rapid return system, is shipped partially assembled, is easy to install, and is module specific.

Simplicity and Elegance
The sun's heat moves liquid from side to side, allowing gravity to turn the Track Rack and follow the sun – no motors, no gears and no controls to fail.
But I agree that a tracker has a much greater cost, so the much longer payback makes it hard to justify.

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2008, 01:48 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 1,096

2k2Prot5 - '02 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 33.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 17 Times in 14 Posts
I believe that the justification would be shorter paybacks... you're forgetting that you aren't just following the sun for the sheer fun of it, you are doing so to increase your system efficiency. The idea is to make sure that you increase in cost is paid for by your increase in efficiency before the payback period is up for a non-tracking system... if not, then don't track.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2008, 02:00 PM   #24 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Funny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 409

Eco-Fit - '13 Honda Fit Base
90 day: 37.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Subscribed, and very interested in adding solar charging to the Rolling Lemon.
__________________
American by right
Ecomodder by choice
Hypermiler by necessity

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-10-2008, 09:07 PM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Omaha Nebraska area
Posts: 271

Civic - '98 Honda Civic DX
90 day: 41.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
There was an article in the omaha paper today that said that the omaha public power district (or OPPD for short) had to renegotiate their coal prices. They had a 5 year contract that expires at the end of this year. However because of the increase in diesel prices, the cost of coal, and the increase in the ammount that it costs to get said coal out of the ground, their new contract cost will increase by 150% per year.
The article said that it will only be about $8 a month extra for all 300,000 customers. However I have a feeling that this will just be for a while and then it will jump alot more.

OPPD has a nuclear plant that is old but still puts out a good portion of the power for the district.
They also have one wind turbine that I think I read isn't super powerfull but it was primarily setup as a an experimental project to see if it would be a good option for the future.

Solar power is looking better and better every day.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2008, 12:46 PM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ryland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 3,903

honda cb125 - '74 Honda CB 125 S1
90 day: 79.71 mpg (US)

green wedge - '81 Commuter Vehicles Inc. Commuti-Car

Blue VX - '93 Honda Civic VX
Thanks: 867
Thanked 434 Times in 354 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83 View Post
The Zomeworks tracker doesn't have a motor :

Introduction — Zomeworks Passive Solar Products

CarloSW2
the zomeworks trackers are nice and work well for a while, but we have one of those as well that is around 20 years old with a few of our oldest panels on it and it doesn't always rest in the morning and that is a common problem it still has a dampener and pivots that need attention.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2008, 04:03 AM   #27 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 406
Thanks: 35
Thanked 143 Times in 105 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MazdaMatt View Post
okay, to all of you quoting numbers you really need get your Watts and Watt-hours straight. You can't say "I produced 7.7 watts today"... watt is a rate, watt-hours is a quantity. Its like saying I drove 100km/h today to describe how far i went. km/h * h = km, which is how far. W*h = Wh, Wh is your measurable, quantifiable, cash-related amount of eletricity produced.

Sorry for the rant, i'm trying to learn here and this thread is very confusing.
And Watts are power, whereas Watt hours are energy(power used over a period of time).
JJ
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2008, 10:07 AM   #28 (permalink)
Old Retired R&D Dude
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woburn Mass USA
Posts: 702

Little Red - '12 Toyota Prius c 2 Two
90 day: 57.82 mpg (US)

"Whitey" Bulger - '14 Toyota RAV4 LE
Thanks: 10
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjackstone View Post
And Watts are power, whereas Watt hours are energy(power used over a period of time).
JJ
A Watt is actually a Watt-second.

A watt is a measure of actual current flow (at a certain voltage) or work done.

1 Watt=1 volt x 1 amp for 1 second of time. P=IxE

If you look at your amp meter and see 10A and your Volt meter says 12V,
during each second, you are using 120 Watts of power.

If you only left the switch on of 1/2 a second, only 60 watts was used..

If you kept the switch on for an hour, you will have used 120 watt hours.
After about 9 hours, you would have used one KWH.
__________________
Cheers,
Rich

Current ride: 2014 RAV4 LE AWD (24 MPG)

Wife's Pizza Transporter
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 09:43 AM   #29 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Western WI
Posts: 21
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Xringer;61117]A Watt is actually a Watt-second.

A watt is a measure of actual current flow (at a certain voltage) or work done.

1 Watt=1 volt x 1 amp for 1 second of time. P=IxE QUOTE]


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!


NO NO NO NO NO---there is no time involved.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2008, 02:34 PM   #30 (permalink)
Old Retired R&D Dude
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Woburn Mass USA
Posts: 702

Little Red - '12 Toyota Prius c 2 Two
90 day: 57.82 mpg (US)

"Whitey" Bulger - '14 Toyota RAV4 LE
Thanks: 10
Thanked 18 Times in 17 Posts
Did they change it??

[QUOTE=WisJim;61680]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xringer View Post
A Watt is actually a Watt-second.

A watt is a measure of actual current flow (at a certain voltage) or work done.

1 Watt=1 volt x 1 amp for 1 second of time. P=IxE QUOTE]


!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!


NO NO NO NO NO---there is no time involved.
Back in the 70s when I taught electricity and electronics (for 10+ years), the watt always referred to the amount of current x the voltage used over time.

An Ampere being one coulomb. (A coulomb is equal to exactly 6.24150962915265 ×10 to the 18th elementary charges.).
Or, a whole big bunch of electrons!!

Here ya go!
Watt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The watt (symbol: W) is the SI derived unit of power, equal to one joule of energy per second. It measures a rate of energy use or production.

__________________
Cheers,
Rich

Current ride: 2014 RAV4 LE AWD (24 MPG)

Wife's Pizza Transporter
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Replacing alternator with solar panel array on roof? blackjackel EcoModding Central 91 01-19-2012 10:19 PM
Solar cell panel on the roof..?. Xringer EcoModding Central 5 09-07-2008 02:51 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com