Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
Right, well one of those laminated panels would provide about 5A, enough to supplement an alternator. 15 1/2" x 216" and $447 is a lot of PV material to even fit on a car. I think the best it it do is power some ventilation fans and your stereo.
|
Thanks, Neil. I now deem you "Ol' Reliable". Don't worry, it's a compliment. You've done a great deal to enhance my experience as an ecomodder. Hope you never go away.
Anyhow...
I think that if an affordable solar setup was obtained, it would be fun. Fun unfortunately doesn't amount to practical. If I had a million dollars, maybe. I'm infamous for saying "why does it have to pay for itself?", however as a young student of History Education, it becomes more of a question of "How CAN this pay for itself?"
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4
The wiki here says that in theory every 50 watts of electrical load you remove you can pick up something like 0.55% fuel economy.
|
Thanks. If this information is accurate, it would take a lot of surface area to amount to little mpg improvement. With that said, the better your fuel economy to being with, the better your results with this setup would be.
For instance: my 2001 vw beetle tdi automatic gets around 45 mpg. x/45=.55/100 is my formula.
From this, I learn that "theoretically", I should gain .2475 mpg from the solar addition.
Similarly, if Frank Lee's '98 Mercury Sable Automatic recieved the same solar treatment: x/30=.55/100
He would likely only see a .165 mpg gain.
In summary, if you're in the market for a new hybrid, buy one withOUT the solar panel. I say this, because you're paying for it one way or the other. And, while it provides a bit of nostalgia and is quite honestly very, VERY cool, it will likely not amount to significant savings concerning fuel economy or monies.