Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-29-2010, 05:15 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Meph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ontario
Posts: 84

240Z - '73 Datsun 240Z 240Z
90 day: 34.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Spoiler or not to spoiler

Moving onto the read end of my Z, trying to determine if my hatch spoiler would in fact decrease Cd as wind tunnel tests have shown in this post here

Windtunnel Test Data - HybridZ

tests #9 to #12

I own two hatches, one with and without. Im currently finishing the spoiler-less to be installed pending what everyones thinking.



Take a look at the data, pics are lower down in the same post. Would deleting the spoiler in theory, assist mileage?

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-29-2010, 07:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Am I missing something? I only see results for tests 19-28. It looks like the spoiler helps, at least the #28 test with 90% of the front covered has the lowest drag. It should be even lower if it were not a race car with the windows open. Make yours like the blue car.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2010, 09:51 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Meph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: ontario
Posts: 84

240Z - '73 Datsun 240Z 240Z
90 day: 34.41 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
theres two images of results, maybe the first failed to load, check again, tests 9-12, they show a erduction in drag but maybe someone can look at the shape and curves and tell if this is possible, or if id be better off with a standard hatch.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 02:00 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: belgium
Posts: 663

vectra a - '95 Opel Vectra GLS
90 day: 37.51 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 61 Times in 44 Posts
the hatch is the wrong angle for the flow to staty attached. the spoiler virtually decreases this angle. cars like a porche 911 or the saab 900 also use a big poiler at the rear, that actually gives them a profile more like a common sedan. and than theres also the pinto crisis fighter that used a similar spoiler like the one pictured. cars like the prius or insight all have fairly high rear ends, this is because the ideal slope of the rear for the flow to remain attached is not very steep so with a normal lenght this will result in a high rear.

the reson why a lot of cars don't do this is because it usually results in a split rear window.

the position of the spoiler is another matter of course as it can work in two ways. a full horizontal spoiler would extend the car and change the virtual angle of the rear but angling the spoiler up would reduce the length needed to get the same virtual angle, it would also make more downforce but also more drag (still the net effect would be an overall drag reduction).

since you already have some interesting data and i assume this car is not intended to become the ultimate aero car, i'd figure out what configuration of spoiler reduces drag the most and go with that. if you add an undertray and perhaps even tire dams you can further reduce the drag, and enhance the performance, without making any real visible changes the the classic shape.
__________________
aer·o·dy·nam·ics: the science of passing gass

*i can coast for miles and miles and miles*
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to lunarhighway For This Useful Post:
Meph (07-30-2010)
Old 07-31-2010, 01:26 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 15,883
Thanks: 23,957
Thanked 7,219 Times in 4,646 Posts
remove it and lose

According to CAR and DRIVER magazine's experiments with Z-Cars in 1974,removing the spoiler will cause increased drag and loss of mpg.
The backlight angle is just too fast,and as lunarhighway has mentioned,the spoiler tricks the air into thinking that the hatch has a more gentle slope.
The 1978 ZX has an aft-body of 41.5% of 'Template.'
If the back of the Z-car was fleshed out up to the 'Template' curve and it had a decent windshield,you could get the Cd to 0.202.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2010, 12:47 PM   #6 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 53.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 218 Times in 169 Posts
Meph, If you could get the rest of the wind tunnel data to post that could be interesting. I am curious what the whale tail does to things and what is a Pantera Hatch? It looks like it could be a recessed hatch with a vertical rear window like some mid engine cars use.

It sure seems counterintuitive that something sticking up at the back of the car could reduce drag and improve mpg.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2010, 04:56 AM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Allentown, PA
Posts: 54

OCDobject - '74 buick Apollo
90 day: 12.18 mpg (US)

Black Tardis - '13 Kia Soul Base
90 day: 30.64 mpg (US)
Thanks: 24
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
It sure seems counterintuitive that something sticking up at the back of the car could reduce drag and improve mpg.


I cite an episode of Mythbusters where they tested whether it was more efficient to drive a pickup with the tail gate open or closed. They found that it was actually more efficient to drive tail gate closed. Which as you state here, is counter intuitive. They did further testing to see why this is and found that with the tail gate up it creates a small and beneficial vortex inside the bed of the truck. This bubble of turbulent air creates a cushion that the main bulk of air flowing over the truck rides over. In essence it creates a sort of virtual kamback in the bed of the truck. With a vertical, or near vertical spoiler on the back of a car you should have a similar phenomena, if only in a smaller scale.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2010, 12:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
When a spoiler like that is beneficial, it is almost always a band-aid, because the aero of the original design is relatively poor. The older Porsche 911s were this way, and for a very similar reason--the rear slope was too great, so adding a spoiler would create a flatter "virtual" rear slope that not only reduced lift (the primary goal for the 911 and likely the Z as well) but also reduced drag slightly.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2010, 03:17 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
The lowest drag of all those tests has a wing and VGs on the rear:





It looks like the wing helps straighten out the airflow from the steep rear end. This combination has the lowest CD and the lowest front/rear lift from their tests.

__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to decide whether to remove rear spoiler to decrease drag, improve mileage MetroMPG Aerodynamics 130 02-10-2015 08:50 PM
aero-mods ( installment#8-INDUCED-DRAG(spoilers/lips/flaps) aerohead Aerodynamics 12 12-04-2012 06:19 PM
worthwhile changes? (spoiler / bumper) colonelk Aerodynamics 5 04-06-2010 08:01 AM
Spoiler based on kamm-back dimensions? cfg83 Aerodynamics 14 06-20-2009 03:23 PM
What should I do about the spoiler? 2000mustang fan Aerodynamics 6 08-18-2008 06:38 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com