Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-29-2011, 11:16 PM   #71 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Hmmm...



from: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...ans-15417.html

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
aerohead (02-05-2011), t vago (01-29-2011)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-29-2011, 11:46 PM   #72 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,808

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 831
Thanked 709 Times in 457 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by KamperBob View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
These two shells illustrate something that I think is not adequately addressed whenever people think about aerocaps for trucks.

It's not enough to shape the cap so that air from the top travels downward smoothly. It must be remembered that air also travels around the sides of the vehicle, and so it is important to shape the cap so that the air travels back to the center smoothly.

I hope that tomorrow I can complete my idea of having a quick-release feature for this aerocap I'm going to make. The cap will have an aluminum base frame that will actually secure the cap to the truck. The foam frame will be securely glued to the aluminum base frame. The foam skin will then be applied on top.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 09:32 AM   #73 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
The shape at the tailgate would seem to be very important, too. The black Italian-designed unit appears to have a *rising* wedge on the sides? The cap I modeled has a downward curve on the sides:

__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 09:57 AM   #74 (permalink)
Recreation Engineer
 
KamperBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere USA
Posts: 525

Black Stallion - '02 Toyota Tundra 4WD xCab

Half Pint - '06 Yamaha XT225
Thanks: 333
Thanked 138 Times in 103 Posts
Neil, I agree with your concern about those wedge shoulders.


Your design is interesting. I like your down-arch shoulders over the tailgate in terms of direction. I just hope flow will attach to it since that club-cab Dakota has a pretty short box. Do you have any plans to find out?

My truck box is 2-3 inches higher in the back than front over a length of 78 inches so ~2 degrees. That probably helped my previous hard tonneau with reattachment.
__________________
Recreation Engineer

Last edited by KamperBob; 01-31-2011 at 12:34 PM.. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 12:11 PM   #75 (permalink)
T-100 Road Warrior
 
BamZipPow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 1,921

BZP T-100 (2010) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 24 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2011) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 23.66 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2009) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 19.01 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2012) - '98 Toyota T-100 ext cab - 3.4L/auto SR5
Last 3: 25.45 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2013) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 25.79 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2014) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.18 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2015) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 23.85 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2016) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
Last 3: 17.62 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2017) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.78 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2018) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5
90 day: 20.19 mpg (US)

BZP T-100 (2019) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

BZP T-100 (2020) - '98 Toyota T-100 SR5

2012 Scion iQ - '12 Scion iQ Base
Thanks: 3,502
Thanked 1,395 Times in 968 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to BamZipPow
I would guess the reason why the Italian cap has high rear shoulders is fer the locking mechanism. The single turn handle is under the middle hatch and uses the center locking system with rods that go to the sides.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 12:49 PM   #76 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
I still say that is one of the sexiest aerocaps Ive seen.
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 12:57 PM   #77 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by t vago View Post
It's not enough to shape the cap so that air from the top travels downward smoothly. It must be remembered that air also travels around the sides of the vehicle...
This reminds me of an idea I had, which is to make some air from the sides flow through the bed. Have a NACA-style inlet forward of the wheel well, and louvers in the tailgate. Any thoughts?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 01:33 PM   #78 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
I wonder how effective the tailbox design is on trying to recover some energy after the flat windshields and sides of the vehicle has created a ton of shear over the front and sides and hence turbulent flow from near the front of the vehicle. Perhaps the tail box needs to be made bigger so that the flow has a chance to reattach and stay attached. Similar to the Toyota truck that was for sale on ebay a few months ago.

__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2011, 07:58 PM   #79 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
2d/3d

Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
It's been mentioned before that you can get away with a steeper angle if the sides also taper in smoothly.

The streamlining template used is only 2D - the ideal low speed aero shape is an ice-cream cone (with only one ball of ice-cream ) where there are no sides, only taper.
The Aerodynamic Streamlining Template is based on a streamline body of revolution( Jaray's Zeppelins ) and is intended to be used for 3D streamlining as you can see on the T-100 and trailer project.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2011, 12:02 PM   #80 (permalink)
Recreation Engineer
 
KamperBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Somewhere USA
Posts: 525

Black Stallion - '02 Toyota Tundra 4WD xCab

Half Pint - '06 Yamaha XT225
Thanks: 333
Thanked 138 Times in 103 Posts
I have two different designs.

A) Split with a hinge in front. The top lifts up. The sides are wedges bulged slightly at the front. All convex - no concave.


B) One piece that slides back and tilts forward. The bottom gutter edges would have a couple inch fillet (hard to draw).


Notes:
  • Both match cab shape at the front for smooth transition.
  • Slopes are all less than 22 degrees from normal.
  • Compound curvature using fiberglassed (similar to T's).

Which would you prefer and why?

__________________
Recreation Engineer
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
aerocap, aerodynamic, aeroshell, dakota, truck





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com