Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-18-2012, 08:57 PM   #31 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-19-2012, 03:32 AM   #32 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,748

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Sven7, was that a video from your car?

Quote:
Originally Posted by viio View Post
Truck is 15.1m long, 5.1m from top to bottom.
Those proportions look a little off. On the Continent trucks are usually 18m long and 4m tall. I know that UK doesn't have the 4m height limit, but I thought most of them were no more than 4-4.5m tall. I could be wrong, though.
Reducing the height to 4m would reduce the wake's length and make it more symmetric (top-down vs side view).

But even with those proportions in the view of the car 54m back it looks so far behind. Maybe I'm just too used to Polish drivers driving bumper to bumper at highway speeds - not for economy, but because they think it's faster. Maybe I'm wrong about that, too
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 03:37 AM   #33 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 102

Project EconoPolo - '04 Volkswagen Polo Twist TDi
90 day: 48.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts
Yeah my proportions are a little squiffy but close enough to learn from. I could model again with a 4m truck. I know Vekke is keen to see a road train so I'm going to model that too.
__________________
Viio
Amateur SolidWorks Flow Simulator

Link to my Project EconoPolo (aeromodding a VW)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to viio For This Useful Post:
Vekke (01-19-2012)
Old 01-19-2012, 02:51 PM   #34 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 102

Project EconoPolo - '04 Volkswagen Polo Twist TDi
90 day: 48.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts
Here is one using a more accurate model of a European HGV, and the proportions are fixed - 18m long, 4.5m high.



Next is a render to see just how far the truck's wake goes, and then the road train.
__________________
Viio
Amateur SolidWorks Flow Simulator

Link to my Project EconoPolo (aeromodding a VW)
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to viio For This Useful Post:
Piwoslaw (01-19-2012), Vekke (01-19-2012)
Old 01-19-2012, 03:15 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piwoslaw View Post
Sven7, was that a video from your car?
No
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 03:27 PM   #36 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 102

Project EconoPolo - '04 Volkswagen Polo Twist TDi
90 day: 48.23 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 61 Times in 24 Posts
Question

Okay, so this is a learning process for me, and I think I've made a bit of a boob.

This time I've set the colour gradients so that it's clearer to see where the air is back at 25m/s, and the wake is much smaller than original expected.

Just after the 40metre indicator on the ruler you can see that the air is back to full speed (where a normal car height would be). That makes me think that the wake is no longer effective 35 metres behind the truck.

Any thoughts?

__________________
Viio
Amateur SolidWorks Flow Simulator

Link to my Project EconoPolo (aeromodding a VW)
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 03:38 PM   #37 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 389

2003 Ninja EX250 - '03 Kawasaki Ninja EX250
90 day: 78.57 mpg (US)

Saturn - '99 Saturn SL1 Base
90 day: 47.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
The problem i have with drafting semi's, at least on the Garden State Parkway in New Jersey, is that semi drivers rarely ever follow speed limits, and rarely ever do they drive with constant load. They accelerate hard up upgrades and let off on down grades. They themselves drive very inefficiently, which in turn forces you, the drafter, to drive inefficient. Thus, the potential gains are not as great.

Draft semi's who cruise at a constant speed on flat highway works amazing, though.
__________________
Doing my part to reduce dependence on OIL
Doing my part to reduce congestion
And enjoying it!

If you have to use your brakes, you are driving too fast!

My 101.5 MPG 2003 Kawasaki Ninja 250




Crude Oil Price Today
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 03:47 PM   #38 (permalink)
aero guerrilla
 
Piwoslaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,748

Svietlana II - '13 Peugeot 308SW e-HDI 6sp
90 day: 58.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by viio View Post
Any thoughts?
Yeah, I liked the earlier wakes more. I'm not going to draft any your new trucks, viio

No really, what happened? Did you change any of the parameters, or only the coloring? In the previous models it appeared that the 19m/s part of the wake extended quite far, here even the 22m/s vectors end much earlier.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be

What matters is where you're going, not how fast.

"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell


[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 04:13 PM   #39 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by theycallmeebryan View Post
The problem i have with drafting semi's, at least on the Garden State Parkway in New Jersey, is that semi drivers rarely ever follow speed limits, and rarely ever do they drive with constant load. They accelerate hard up upgrades and let off on down grades. They themselves drive very inefficiently, which in turn forces you, the drafter, to drive inefficient.
I dunno, thats how I drive too and I've hit 100% above EPA driving that way. It surently isn't very inefficient. DWL is not as good as P&G and pulsing up a hill to glide down it is much more efficient as long as you have a manual trans or can keep your torque converter locked.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2012, 05:44 PM   #40 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 389

2003 Ninja EX250 - '03 Kawasaki Ninja EX250
90 day: 78.57 mpg (US)

Saturn - '99 Saturn SL1 Base
90 day: 47.27 mpg (US)
Thanks: 25
Thanked 58 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
I dunno, thats how I drive too and I've hit 100% above EPA driving that way. It surently isn't very inefficient. DWL is not as good as P&G and pulsing up a hill to glide down it is much more efficient as long as you have a manual trans or can keep your torque converter locked.
I understand that. I think what i meant to say is that it's difficult to gauge when a trucker is going to speed up or slow down on small rolling terrain when you are trying to draft 10-15 feet away from it. In these situations, i find myself using the gas and brake more often in order to maintain that distance, more so than i would when driving normally without drafting.

There have been times when a trucker has slowed down considerably and then just floors it and accelerates away from me. For me to have any chance of staying in the wake, I also have to floor it and try to keep up. Then they'll get up past 60mph and i'll have to play catch-up to try to get back in the wake.

Basically what I'm saying is, it really depends on how the trucker is driving whether or not you are going to get a decent amount of benefit out of it, at least around here.

__________________
Doing my part to reduce dependence on OIL
Doing my part to reduce congestion
And enjoying it!

If you have to use your brakes, you are driving too fast!

My 101.5 MPG 2003 Kawasaki Ninja 250




Crude Oil Price Today
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com