01-21-2012, 02:50 AM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,748
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
|
This thread was supposed to be about modelling the aerodynamics of drafting a semi.
Iirc, there are other threads which discuss the safety of such driving.
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 12:51 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
Not wearing pants
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: GP, Oregon
Posts: 60
Thanks: 223
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO
Mythbusters showed ...
|
Mythbusters = Entertainment Masquerading as Science.
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 01:37 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEiN
Mythbusters = Entertainment Masquerading as Science.
|
Often though provoking, you must admit.
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 01:54 PM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TEiN
Mythbusters = Entertainment Masquerading as Science.
|
I don't disagree, but many drafting advocates base their position on their data; until better data comes along, theirs seems plausible enough.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 03:16 PM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
aero guerrilla
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Posts: 3,748
Thanks: 1,328
Thanked 749 Times in 476 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO
I don't disagree, but many drafting advocates base their position on their data; until better data comes along, theirs seems plausible enough.
|
More like: Until better data hits mainstream entertainment...
Just because better data exists doesn't mean that people will look for it, or even notice, unless it's wrapped up all nice in sugar and has an easy to swallow coating.
Now, back to CFD modelling...
__________________
e·co·mod·ding: the art of turning vehicles into what they should be
What matters is where you're going, not how fast.
"... we humans tend to screw up everything that's good enough as it is...or everything that we're attracted to, we love to go and defile it." - Chris Cornell
[Old] Piwoslaw's Peugeot 307sw modding thread
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Piwoslaw For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-21-2012, 06:56 PM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Oakton, VA
Posts: 189
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 19 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5
Drafting a lorry seems relatively safe to me. While you cannot come to a stop within 100ft of distance, neither can the truck unless he hit a concrete wall. All of my vehicles can stop much, much quicker than a semi. Besides that, they only travel 60mph tops where I'm at. This isn't nearly as dangerous as those that tailgate doing 85 in the fast lane.
|
My car will stop in just over 100ft at 60mph. On the factory (crap) tires. My other car is much worse at 189 ft from 70 on factory (crap) tires and factory (crap) brake pads. I'd put it close to 130ft now. A semi braking distance from 65mph is over 400 feet. http://utahmc.com/trucksmart/trucksm...-factsheet.pdf
Additionally, on a semi there is a delay between when the brake lights come on and the brakes are actually applied. Air brakes have a significant lag (you can read the limits of it in the FMVSS standards).
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 08:21 PM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
O.K.
So...back to the CFD discussion.
What are your machines specs ( Speed, RAM, etc )
Are you using a renderfarm or a single machine ?
Great to see SolidWorks being used here on the site ! Looking forward to more.
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 09:18 PM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Syracuse, NY USA
Posts: 2,935
Thanks: 326
Thanked 1,315 Times in 968 Posts
|
Is solid works rendering in 3D? Can you pan the view to see from the top? Can it do an animation with little airborne "bubbles" showing all of the actual flow?
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 10:33 PM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
I think the benefit extends back further than most here might think. I can link you to videos of the Hampton Roads Bridge tunnel cameras where 90,000 cars pass over the same point in a two lane (each way) road in 24 hours. Two seconds ain't working there and thats 24-7 with periods where the separation distances are 3 cars lengths or less.
45,000 cars over the exact same spot, in a single lane, in an 86,400 second day. Do the math, it doesn't work with 2 seconds separation.
AVERAGE FOR HOURS AT 60MPH!
You can forget 2 seconds here. 2 seconds will get you passed on the right by another car in the gap you leave, even on the approach lanes at intersections.
Generally I try to keep 3 stripes between myself and the vehicle in front. 43 feet from the same point to point stripe to stripe, about 100 feet. I find that at that distance I get the same mileage at 65-70 on the Interstate as I get at 55 on the parallel road that has no traffic, over 50 miles of distance.
Another point, the air directly behind the tractor trailer is moving forward, which I don't see in the flow diagram. Since it has to be moving forward or you would be in a perfect vacuum and suffocate, then the flow reversal has to take some time before it occurs, maybe not modelled in your illustration.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
01-21-2012, 11:07 PM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
Ultimate Fail
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sendler
Is solid works rendering in 3D? Can you pan the view to see from the top? Can it do an animation with little airborne "bubbles" showing all of the actual flow?
|
Yes ! True 3D !
And yes you can render animations as well .
Yes, yes, and yes !
If you are a student, you can get an educational copy with a 6mo. license for a hundred bucks !
Educational copies have deep discounts.
I paid $ 300 bucks for a program that cost over $ 3,500 when I was a student.
|
|
|
|