Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2013, 09:10 AM   #71 (permalink)
Yariscar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I don't understand why the ABS / traction control feature would get confused on clean dry pavement i.e. non-winter highway driving. My drive is not a commute so I avoid idiots on the road during rush hours.
For the winter, yes, I'd retain my 15 inch rims and winter tires.

You can see why I still don't have a good answer to my question: Will the MPG improve if I increase the rim and tire size on the rear wheels?
Increasing the size on the front wheels increases weight and frontal area and raises the vehicle.

miro

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 12-11-2013, 09:19 AM   #72 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by miro View Post
I don't understand why the ABS / traction control feature would get confused on clean dry pavement i.e. non-winter highway driving......
I don't understand it either, but there have been enough reports of problems that it shouldn't be discounted. My guess is that the vehicle is measuring ground speed and comparing that to wheel speed. If it sees a difference, the electronics assume the vehicle is skidding.

Quote:
Originally Posted by miro View Post
......You can see why I still don't have a good answer to my question: Will the MPG improve if I increase the rim and tire size on the rear wheels?....
I'm hoping you realize that there isn't an answer to your question as the issue is complicated and varies all over the lot. There are factors that have much more impact than tire size - and the difference due to tire size isn't consistent.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 09:21 AM   #73 (permalink)
Yariscar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I forgot to add that I have a manual 5 speed transmission.

I really don't care about acceleration and I don't haul heavy loads or pull a trailer. The two-way highway trip is about 450 km and I do it every 2 weeks.
The terrain is not hilly.

Since the rims and tires in the rear are larger, won't the engine RPM be lower for the the same highway speed ( i.e. 100 km per hour - the speed limit) and thus lower the MPG?
miro
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 01:40 PM   #74 (permalink)
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
Just a thought, find tires with the highest air pressure rating. I gained over 2 mpg on a 97 Jeep Cherokee by putting on BFG All terrains at 50 psi, compared to the 35 psi old tires.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 03:18 PM   #75 (permalink)
MPGuino Supporter
 
t vago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Hungary
Posts: 1,807

iNXS - '10 Opel Zafira 111 Anniversary

Suzi - '02 Suzuki Swift GL
Thanks: 829
Thanked 708 Times in 456 Posts
I'd probably aim for tires that were wider, rather than tires that were taller. That, along with inflating to maximum pressure, will decrease rolling resistance by a lot.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 04:11 PM   #76 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
My 2 cents- I have had 265 and 245 tires on my F150 when 235 is stock. They were also somewhat taller. MPG dropped vs stock in both instances. They were all P-series highway tread tires.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 10:43 PM   #77 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: NA
Posts: 29
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by miro View Post
I don't understand why the ABS / traction control feature would get confused on clean dry pavement i.e. non-winter highway driving. My drive is not a commute so I avoid idiots on the road during rush hours.
For the winter, yes, I'd retain my 15 inch rims and winter tires.

You can see why I still don't have a good answer to my question: Will the MPG improve if I increase the rim and tire size on the rear wheels?
Increasing the size on the front wheels increases weight and frontal area and raises the vehicle.

miro
If the sensors on the front wheels are reading one speed and the sensors on the rear wheels are reading another, that's pretty much the condition the traction control is intended to prevent. ABS will read it as sliding and activate prematurely, decreasing braking performance. YMMV.

I'd go for tall, skinny tires with highway tread. Prolly load range E so I can inflate them to 80 psi for less flex. Check the commercial vehicle tire selection for small delivery trucks, might weigh a little more, but should last longer and have lower RR. Not too much of a disadvantage on long flat stretches of highway.

Last edited by mallrat; 12-11-2013 at 10:51 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 07:24 AM   #78 (permalink)
CFECO
 
CFECO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Vail, AZ.
Posts: 552

X-Car - '11 Homemade 2+2

Velbly1 - '17 Toyota Camery XSE
90 day: 29 mpg (US)

Velbly2 - '13 Toyota Tundra
90 day: 18.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 174
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
Raising the rear will also decrease the slope of the windshield and raise the cab height, possibly increasing drag.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 09:40 AM   #79 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Joggernot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 451
Thanks: 1,823
Thanked 127 Times in 106 Posts
Just a thought. 6-ply truck tires are usually rated at 80 psi sidewall. Unless you are in some special location, you'll have to order these tires.

Joggernot
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2013, 02:57 PM   #80 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
I have talked to hundreds of pickup guys and the trend is very clear:

Bigger diameter wheels/tire = worse MPG.

The reason is straightforward. Unless you run very long legs at the same road speed, you have to accelerate. Not only do you have to accelerate the vehicle, you must first accelerate the wheels/tires before they will accelerate the vehicle.

The polar moment of inertia goes up with the square of the diameter, so if you go from 13 inch wheels to 16 inch wheels the polar moment of inertia increases by 33%. The wheel/tire assemblies act like flywheels.

Look at the high-MPG cars available. Small diameter tires. 13 or 14 inch. No 18 inch wheels on the vehicles with high MPG.

Stay with the factory-sized rubber. They do know what they are doing.

__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Big Dave For This Useful Post:
t vago (12-12-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com