04-12-2013, 11:36 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 190
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
|
Tire Diameter Change In Fuel Log?
Just wondering if anything has been considered to add a variable in the fuel log input for a change in tire diameter?
An easy way to effectively make your car's gearing taller is to increase your tire's diameter. For example, going from a 25" tall tire to a 26" tall tire will effectively give you a 4% increase in "gearing".
The issue with this comes when logging fuel data. Your car's odometer has no way to compensate for the change in tire size so your reported distance will be 4% shy of your actual distance travelled.
Is/has there been any thought of adding this feature to the fuel log? I may decide to put taller tires on my car for winter driving next year, but if I do so it will get complicated to track mileage with the fuel log.
__________________
2016 BMW 535d
4100lb XDrive Eco-Yacht
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-12-2013, 11:43 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
I'm dealing with the same thing in my Firefly owing to a transmission change. I've been correcting my "trip odometer" distance prior to entering the fill data in the fuel log.
|
|
|
04-15-2013, 02:24 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Wanting more for less
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New South Wales, Australia
Posts: 313
Thanks: 23
Thanked 73 Times in 45 Posts
|
I'm running oversized tyres on my Mazda.
Checking odometer milage against my GPS, shows a 5.7% difference.
I simply multiply my odometer figure by 1.057 when entering a fuel log.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to D.O.G. For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-15-2013, 11:00 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
I forgot to do this with my Ranger when I went from 14 to 15 inch wheels. I use a 19.9 mile trip I do about 4 times a week to check the distance and compare the two. The Ranger was off by 2.6%. The Kawasaki with a 15 (versus 14 stock) front sprocket was off by 7.14%.
Since the fuel log uses actual distance travelled I just bump the odometer reading by the correction amount, to get the actual distance within 1/200th of exact distance.
The calculation is based on the average recorded distance of at least 10 different vehicles over the last 8+ years of driving-riding that route, both ways.
On the Ranger, I found my reciept when the wheels and tires were changed which was 12/11/12 and my fuel log showed a refill on 12/12/12, so I just used the +2.6% correction on every log entry after that point to get it correct and current.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
04-15-2013, 01:28 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 190
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
|
I guess it's not that big a deal to do here, as you input the distance travelled instead of the odometer reading. Capturing the correction factor in the notes seems easy enough.
I have an app on my iPhone called "Fuel Log" that I use at the pump while filling, and I also use the Fuelly page, both of which are set up to capture your odometer reading. I know I have the choice with the app to configure it the other way (distance travelled on tank), but I made the mistake of setting it up the odometer way as it was a brand new car. I'll have to look into the Fuelly page and see if I can change it.
__________________
2016 BMW 535d
4100lb XDrive Eco-Yacht
|
|
|
04-15-2013, 01:33 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Eco-ventor
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,645
Thanks: 76
Thanked 709 Times in 450 Posts
|
I just recalculate the Pulses Per Mile-value on the MPGuino.
__________________
2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
|
|
|
04-15-2013, 03:35 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 190
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakobnev
I just recalculate the Pulses Per Mile-value on the MPGuino.
|
The MPG-what? I have factory installed, perfectly optimistic fuel computers inflating my ego... why would I pay more to feel worse about my mileage?
__________________
2016 BMW 535d
4100lb XDrive Eco-Yacht
|
|
|
04-15-2013, 04:28 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
Depending on the vehicle, it can be done in software. I changed my tire size with a tuner. I know in a lot of cases a dealer can do it for you. It's a fairly common thing to do with pickups, as there are folks out there who put on huge tires and still want a reasonably accurate speedometer.
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Diesel_Dave For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-16-2013, 09:00 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 190
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diesel_Dave
Depending on the vehicle, it can be done in software.
|
I will be looking into this. I have HPTuners and I know the tire size can be set for my Corvette, but I'm not sure about the Cruze. If that's the case I'm all good and just need to update the tune whenever the tire size changes.
__________________
2016 BMW 535d
4100lb XDrive Eco-Yacht
|
|
|
04-16-2013, 02:03 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
Regarding the GM Chevrolet 2013 Cruze, below are the OEM tires and their respective "engine revolutions @ 50 mph" (EPA value: N/V). Notice however, that regardless of the rim diameter, they ALL are roughly about 35(A) or 38(M) engine rev's per mile at 50 mph vehicle speed for the same Final Drive Ratio (FDR), except for the ECO and LS models:
6-SPEED AUTOMATIC (FDR = 3.53:1):
• P215/60R16 (Firestone)....N/V = 36.5 (LS, FDR = 3.72:1)
• P215/60R16 (Firestone)....N/V = 35.1
• P215/55R17 (Goodyear).....N/V = 34.9 (ECO)
• P225/50R17 (Continental)..N/V = 35.4
• P225/45R18 (Michelin).....N/V = 35.4
6-SPEED MANUAL (FDR = 3.83:1):
• P215/60R16 (Firestone)....N/V = 38.7 (LS, FDR = 3.94:1)
• P215/60R16 (Firestone)....N/V = 37.6
• P215/55R17 (Goodyear).....N/V = 30.8 (ECO)
• P225/50R17 (Continental)..N/V = 37.9
• P225/45R18 (Michelin).....N/V = 37.9
Source: GM to EPA document, "Application for Certification 2013 Model Year", page 62: http://iaspub.epa.gov/otaqpub/displa...d=29809&flag=1
Last edited by gone-ot; 04-16-2013 at 09:14 PM..
|
|
|
|