Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-22-2015, 01:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
!!ytinasnI
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 11

PhY-49 - '90 Honda CRX Si
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The taller tires are being considered to lower the RPM at my planned cruising speed of 75mph and (hopefully) keep the motor in lean burn.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-22-2015, 11:41 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 52.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
In that case I'd consider something that was the height of the 195s but narrower than that.

Coker Tire in Chattanooga carries tall/skinny tires that give you the rolling circumference you're looking for. For instance: https://www.cokertire.com/tires/styl...wall-tire.html

That's not as tall as the 195 but taller than the stockers. NOTE: the tire specs call for a 3" wide rim! SUPER skinny. Also very useful in extremely wet conditions, ultra-skinny tires don't hydroplane much.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2015, 02:43 AM   #13 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
I can maintain lean burn on the highway as high as 80mph in my insight. I'm going to say this once, and I'm not going to try to argue my point past this.

You will regret not going insight rims/HX rims w/Re92's. Any tire that is 'taller' that will decrease cruising speed RPM is going to be minimum 5lbs heavier that an Re92. All MPG gains from that will be negated by increased surface contact, higher rolling resistance and increased rotational mass. The laws of physics don't allow a tire with more mass made of the same material to weigh less. That's just the way it is.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Baltothewolf For This Useful Post:
The donkey CRX (07-27-2015), user removed (07-27-2015)
Old 07-23-2015, 07:28 AM   #14 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
First, your issue to going to be mostly about steady state fuel economy - parasitic drag and rolling resistance. A larger diameter tires is going to be a very worthwhile addition - and more importantly, you need to up in tire size and select a tire with good rolling resistance.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2015, 06:21 PM   #15 (permalink)
Lean Burn Cruiser!
 
BabyDiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Johnston County, NC
Posts: 936

Big Blazin' - '88 Chevrolet K5 Blazer Silverado
SUV
90 day: 14.97 mpg (US)

Chili - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
House of Tudor
Team Streamliner
90 day: 72.29 mpg (US)
Thanks: 840
Thanked 491 Times in 310 Posts
Check these out: 175/65R15 Toyo Versado Eco

They are 24.2" tall, which would lower your revs more than you wanted. They are light, thin and LRR though.
__________________



Remember, thank a fellow EM'er for a helpful post!!!
I hypermile better in my cowboy boots

Past threads:
ZX2 modding thread
Ecomodder's Top 10: How they do it!
ZX2 Aerodynamics: Shooting for 0.15 Cd
ZX2 coast-down testing for Cd & Crr
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2015, 11:13 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
GreenHornet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 429
Thanks: 41
Thanked 108 Times in 68 Posts
Insight rims and RE92 would be a very solid choice! Yes unsprung weight is important but you will see wayyyyyyyy more bang for your buck paying attention to the body aero work since you will be commuting at 75mph. Do everything you can in this area and you should be sitting pretty good. Talk to the owner of the Aerocivic he can guide you in the right direction.

GH
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2015, 11:52 PM   #17 (permalink)
!!ytinasnI
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 11

PhY-49 - '90 Honda CRX Si
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm doing way too much research. I've found the smart Fortwo's front tires are Continental contiecontact EP 145/65-15. 12 pounds tires. LRR design. The only wheels on the planet I've found that will fit them and the Crx are Toyota Yaris 15x5 steelies at 16 pounds.

That is +~6 pounds per corner vs. the insight combo. And another 2.5? Pounds per corner for spun aluminum moon discs. Total guess at the weight of the disks.

They are also only 1.5% taller. 900 revs/mile vs the stock 913.

But the kicker is, they're 20mm skinnier per corner. That is 80mm less contact patch width total vs. both stock and the insight.

Stop and go would suffer, but I would, in theory, gain mpg at cruising speed. But if +1.5% isn't big enough to keep me in lean burn, it's all for naught.

Last edited by phyregod; 07-25-2015 at 12:03 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2015, 03:08 AM   #18 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: auckland new Zealand
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'd be reluctant to go too extreme on tyre sizes, you still want your car to look good and be fun in the corners and havehdecent wheel well clearence don't you? 165/65 or 175/65 on a light weight stock off set 14x5 or5.5 alloy would be my choice, i rekon your gears are tall enough as is.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2015, 08:47 AM   #19 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
With that commute, weight is hardly a factor in fuel economy. Improvements in F/E will be all about wind resistance and rolling resistance.

So you want to get the largest possible tire under the fenders - and the best way to measure that is by load carrying capacity (Load Index). Then select a tire line with very low RR (That will be difficult as there is very little published comparing different tire lines.)

You will have to be very careful in tire selection as parts of Texas use asphalt that gets extremely slippery when wet - reported to be similar to ice.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2015, 10:35 AM   #20 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: -
Posts: 30
Thanks: 3
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by CapriRacer View Post
With that commute, weight is hardly a factor in fuel economy. Improvements in F/E will be all about wind resistance and rolling resistance.

So you want to get the largest possible tire under the fenders - and the best way to measure that is by load carrying capacity (Load Index). Then select a tire line with very low RR (That will be difficult as there is very little published comparing different tire lines.)

You will have to be very careful in tire selection as parts of Texas use asphalt that gets extremely slippery when wet - reported to be similar to ice.
EU has new tire labels that mention rolling resistance, so this is a good source of information.
Example site that allows comparisons:
geizhals*eu/?cat=aumrf&xf=2984_1

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com