Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-21-2011, 01:29 PM   #41 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 65
Thanks: 6
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
If I have two bicycles with the same tread but one with wide tires and the other with narrow tires, would doing a coast down comparison be a fair test of the theory?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-23-2011, 03:27 PM   #42 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
width

Quote:
Originally Posted by ngrimm View Post
If I have two bicycles with the same tread but one with wide tires and the other with narrow tires, would doing a coast down comparison be a fair test of the theory?
My opinion is that it would take a wind tunnel with extremely accurate load cells to be able to pull out the difference.Your own body is the largest drag contributor and its interference drag would play into at least the drag of the rear tire.
Technically however,the narrow tire would tunnel out with the lower CdA.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 05:35 PM   #43 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
There are several MB models where they specify different CD numbers for the base skinny tire version vs the optioned up big engine big tire version.
C220 coupe 0.24
C350 coupe 0.27
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2011, 05:48 PM   #44 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
skinny/wide

Quote:
Originally Posted by tjts1 View Post
There are several MB models where they specify different CD numbers for the base skinny tire version vs the optioned up big engine big tire version.
C220 coupe 0.24
C350 coupe 0.27
Yeah,my CRX was that way.Porsche 911s ditto.Trans Am Firebird.
One caveat.The wider tire may get it flush with the flanks of the car,reducing some turbulence,buying back some gain over the increase in frontal area.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-29-2011, 12:22 AM   #45 (permalink)
live, breath, Isuzu-Ds
 
trooper Tdiesel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: oregon
Posts: 231

puddle jumper - '93 Suzuki sidekick base model

energizer bunny - '86 isuzu trooper base model

Clifford the big red dog - '84 GM S-10 durango
Thanks: 1
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
comparing 33"X12.50X15 to 33"X9.50X15 tires on a older SUV with about 100hp.
the tires had the same tred lay out, and where very aggressive about 20/32" of tread.

there was on average a 3 mpg difference


0.01C
__________________
1 86 T\D trooper with rare GEN 3 rods TRANS FIXED NOW DD
1 86 4WD 5sp pup is 2.3L gas, but plan on 2.2L diesel repower
1 91 trop, long term plan is a group buy of imported Isuzu 4JB1-T 2.8L I-4 engines, hoping to get price down to 2K not 3K plus
1993 sidekick my MPG toy, epa rating 26.
i get 29/31 with stock drive train.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-2012, 12:36 AM   #46 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
Just adding this relevant tidbit to the thread for further consideration:

Toyota's latest Avalon was designed with weight reduction as a goal. It is 110 lbs lighter than its predecessor, which permits narrower tires to retain acceptable grip:

Quote:
“Less mass makes Avalon more responsive and engaging near handling limits,” Katarzynski [Program Manager of Avalon Vehicle Development] explained. “Also, with less mass, less tire width is needed to reach competitive grip levels. The smaller width helps minimize drag losses to help enhance fuel economy, too.”
Source: Toyota's weight reduction strategy makes 2013 Avalon lighter, more fuel efficient
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
aerohead (09-08-2012)
Old 10-17-2012, 07:04 AM   #47 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Skokie, IL
Posts: 17

Z28 - '95 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
90 day: 17.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
extra fact supporting the narrow tires,

the new malibu ls has a cd of .29 w/215s on 16s but the maibu eco has a cd of .30 because of the change to wider 225 on 17s
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2012, 03:46 PM   #48 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
Seems like the wider tires cause the lion's share of increased drag, eclipsing reduced rolling resistance, if any.

Maybe we need to work on fairings for the tires, as an adjunct to belly pans, with an eye per Hucho's Calibra wind tunnel photo, which shows airflow hits the front tires at an oblique angle.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2012, 06:50 AM   #49 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto View Post
Seems like the wider tires cause the lion's share of increased drag, eclipsing reduced rolling resistance, if any.......
I don't know about that. My calculations say the opposite.

Barry's Tire Tech

Last bit on the page.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-18-2012, 01:29 PM   #50 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Reducing tire width isn't always going to give you a lower CD. If you go too narrow your wheel wells become big gaping holes in the side of your car that cause drag.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CdA list Daox Aerodynamics 206 10-25-2023 07:32 PM
Top 5 most fuel efficient tires (Lowest Rolling resistance: LRR) blackjackel General Efficiency Discussion 144 01-26-2016 12:39 AM
aero mods-data-% change or Cd change ( installment # 7-Wheels/Tires/Wheelcovers/etc. aerohead Aerodynamics 5 06-04-2014 01:14 PM
Sources of Aerodynamic Drag in Automobiles and Possible Solutions SVOboy Aerodynamics 12 02-17-2010 03:09 PM
Tire Engineer here - concerned about hyperinflating tires CapriRacer Introductions 48 09-26-2009 10:25 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com