Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-04-2012, 06:43 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 9

Opposite of white lightning - '98 Ford F150 Ext cab lariat
90 day: 16.94 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Tires/Gear Ratio/MPG

Hey y'all I've got a confusing (to me anyway) question. I'm looking to downsize my tires from 275/60/17 to probably 255/60/17. I figure this will effectively up my gear ratio from 3.55 to around 3.73ish. I know my lower gears are better for mpg and I love that, but I'd like to be able to tow better and with having 3.73 gears I would probably have better mpg while towing anyway. Now with smaller tires shouldn't I have less energy to rotate the tires effectively upping my mpg?

Please help me figure this out. I obviously don't want to change my gears as in mechanically swapping them and since I need new tires anyway, I just thought I could kill two birds with one stone.

thanks,
DC

__________________
1999 Chevy Tahoe
2wd 3.42 gears
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-04-2012, 06:47 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
royanddoreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: glovertown nl canada
Posts: 91

z - '03 nissan 350z touring
90 day: 36.21 mpg (US)

Diniro - '18 Kia Niro Ex
90 day: 47.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
whats you're rpm at cruising speed now?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2012, 06:52 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Texas
Posts: 9

Opposite of white lightning - '98 Ford F150 Ext cab lariat
90 day: 16.94 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
@ 70mph I'm just above 2000rpm. like maybe 2050 lol
__________________
1999 Chevy Tahoe
2wd 3.42 gears
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 10:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dcarver View Post
Hey y'all I've got a confusing (to me anyway) question. I'm looking to downsize my tires from 275/60/17 to probably 255/60/17. I figure this will effectively up my gear ratio from 3.55 to around 3.73ish. I know my lower gears are better for mpg and I love that, but I'd like to be able to tow better and with having 3.73 gears I would probably have better mpg while towing anyway. Now with smaller tires shouldn't I have less energy to rotate the tires effectively upping my mpg?

Please help me figure this out. I obviously don't want to change my gears as in mechanically swapping them and since I need new tires anyway, I just thought I could kill two birds with one stone.

thanks,
DC
I think you have that backwards. LARGER tires would reduce the effective ratio.

Think of it this way, a smaller diameter traveling at the same rpm generates a lower speed.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 11:08 AM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Adelaide, Australia
Posts: 235

F Truck - '77 Ford F100 2x4, single cab, lwb
90 day: 8.75 mpg (US)

Bombodore - '98 Holden Commodore Exec Wagon
90 day: 21.35 mpg (US)

Civic - '93 Honda Civic GL
90 day: 36.62 mpg (US)

Jim The Prius - '09 Toyota Prius
90 day: 36.66 mpg (US)
Thanks: 154
Thanked 62 Times in 35 Posts
No he has it right, a higher number in the gear ratio = a higher engine speed vs road speed, smaller tires = higher gear ratio = higher engine speed vs road speed
__________________


(Posted in 2020) 2009 Prius Off Road project: https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...ide-38366.html

(Posted in 2012) 1977 F100 Project: http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post310326
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 12:04 PM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: kansas city, mo
Posts: 214

Pantry Boy Supreme (pbs) - '04 Volvo S80 T6 Premier
Thanks: 28
Thanked 46 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dcarver View Post
I'm looking to downsize my tires from 275/60/17 to probably 255/60/17. I figure this will effectively up my gear ratio from 3.55 to around 3.73ish.
Shows your only changing the Width of the tire and not the Diameter. For towing capacity and safety, youd be better off keeping the stock width, of 275/ and just changing the Sidewall Hieght(changing ratio) /55R17 or /50R17. If thats what your are trying to get at?

Refer to Post #7 by MetroMPG
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post324301
Helpful RR chart on the second link, talks more about width of the tire.
__________________
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 12:13 PM   #7 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,181

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,525 Times in 2,799 Posts
You never want smaller tires on a tow vehicle.
You will be giving up a lot of weight capacity.

I see these are metric tires, unless they are LT truck tires you will need to derate their load capacity by 9% I think it is (I dont know why but the tire manufactures recomend this when putting a car tire on a truck or SUV, so do it).

The only reason you would ever want to consider a smaller tire when towing is if you were having trouble pulling the load.

Other than that bigger is better.

Taller Tires - EcoModder
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 02:40 PM   #8 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 794
Thanks: 4
Thanked 388 Times in 237 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobo333 View Post
No he has it right, a higher number in the gear ratio = a higher engine speed vs road speed, smaller tires = higher gear ratio = higher engine speed vs road speed
Opps! I got confusiated.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiderofBikes View Post
Shows your only changing the Width of the tire and not the Diameter........
No, the diameter changes as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RiderofBikes View Post
......... For towing capacity and safety, you'd be better off keeping the stock width, of 275/ and just changing the Sidewall Hieght(changing ratio) /55R17 or /50R17. If thats what your are trying to get at?........
That would also change the diameter - but as is pointed out, this also reduces the load carrying capacity of the tire which is a terrible idea. Think Ford/Firestone and that's what we are talking about.
__________________
CapriRacer

Visit my website: www.BarrysTireTech.com
New Content every month!
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 06:59 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
the both have the same diameter according to tirerack.com 30" (275) 30.1 (255)
As someone else mentioned you have to change the second number

here ia tirerack chart for a tire that has both sizes
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...mpg-23182.html
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2012, 08:01 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
royanddoreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: glovertown nl canada
Posts: 91

z - '03 nissan 350z touring
90 day: 36.21 mpg (US)

Diniro - '18 Kia Niro Ex
90 day: 47.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
275/60/17's are 31.1" vs 255's 30". This should give you a 2115 rpm at 70.This is not a lot of difference but the load range goes down 50-70lbs on 2100 lbs per tire. Nothing to worry about unless you are going to use max loads in your truck.My guess is you will lose some mpg which could be restored by driving 65 mph.Hope this makes sense? Roy B


Last edited by royanddoreen; 09-05-2012 at 08:15 PM.. Reason: correction
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com